{"title":"利用机器学习提高桥梁检测数据质量","authors":"Chenhong Zhang , Xiaoming Lei , Ye Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bridge condition assessment is often compromised by errors in inspection data, limiting reliable maintenance and management decisions. This paper investigates how to enhance inspection data quality by automatically identifying and correcting the inaccurate assessment of structural conditions. A model that integrates textual and quantitative features is proposed to identify defect and condition ratings through defect descriptions, with corresponding dynamic partitioning strategy to detect ambiguous data, and a down-sampling and bagging ensemble to address class imbalance. Validated with ten years of real inspection data from 464 bridges, results show 98 % accuracy in correcting condition scores and 100 % accuracy in condition-level identification. These findings underscore the method's potential to improve the reliability of condition assessment and strengthen bridge management decision-making. Future research can focus on refining condition level identification algorithms for severely deteriorated structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8660,"journal":{"name":"Automation in Construction","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106182"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing bridge inspection data quality using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Chenhong Zhang , Xiaoming Lei , Ye Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bridge condition assessment is often compromised by errors in inspection data, limiting reliable maintenance and management decisions. This paper investigates how to enhance inspection data quality by automatically identifying and correcting the inaccurate assessment of structural conditions. A model that integrates textual and quantitative features is proposed to identify defect and condition ratings through defect descriptions, with corresponding dynamic partitioning strategy to detect ambiguous data, and a down-sampling and bagging ensemble to address class imbalance. Validated with ten years of real inspection data from 464 bridges, results show 98 % accuracy in correcting condition scores and 100 % accuracy in condition-level identification. These findings underscore the method's potential to improve the reliability of condition assessment and strengthen bridge management decision-making. Future research can focus on refining condition level identification algorithms for severely deteriorated structures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automation in Construction\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automation in Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580525002225\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automation in Construction","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926580525002225","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing bridge inspection data quality using machine learning
Bridge condition assessment is often compromised by errors in inspection data, limiting reliable maintenance and management decisions. This paper investigates how to enhance inspection data quality by automatically identifying and correcting the inaccurate assessment of structural conditions. A model that integrates textual and quantitative features is proposed to identify defect and condition ratings through defect descriptions, with corresponding dynamic partitioning strategy to detect ambiguous data, and a down-sampling and bagging ensemble to address class imbalance. Validated with ten years of real inspection data from 464 bridges, results show 98 % accuracy in correcting condition scores and 100 % accuracy in condition-level identification. These findings underscore the method's potential to improve the reliability of condition assessment and strengthen bridge management decision-making. Future research can focus on refining condition level identification algorithms for severely deteriorated structures.
期刊介绍:
Automation in Construction is an international journal that focuses on publishing original research papers related to the use of Information Technologies in various aspects of the construction industry. The journal covers topics such as design, engineering, construction technologies, and the maintenance and management of constructed facilities.
The scope of Automation in Construction is extensive and covers all stages of the construction life cycle. This includes initial planning and design, construction of the facility, operation and maintenance, as well as the eventual dismantling and recycling of buildings and engineering structures.