支撑液体萃取法快速测定血浆中瑞舒伐他汀的含量

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Tjaša Dermota , Mojca Božič Mijovski , Jurij Trontelj
{"title":"支撑液体萃取法快速测定血浆中瑞舒伐他汀的含量","authors":"Tjaša Dermota ,&nbsp;Mojca Božič Mijovski ,&nbsp;Jurij Trontelj","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate measurement of rosuvastatin in plasma is critical for effective patient management and treatment monitoring following myocardial infarction (MI). Expensive solid-phase extraction (SPE) and time-consuming liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) have been established for quantifying rosuvastatin. Supported liquid extraction (SLE) could offer a rapid, cost-effective alternative.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to develop and validate a rapid, cost-effective, accurate, and precise method for quantifying rosuvastatin in high-dose plasma samples from patients following MI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Rosuvastatin was extracted from EDTA plasma using SLE and quantified with LC-MS/MS with positive electrospray ionization. The method was validated according to ICH M10 guidelines, focusing on selectivity, matrix effect, accuracy, precision, linearity, and carryover. Rosuvastatin-D6 was used as an internal standard. Additionally, thirty plasma samples from patients on high-dose rosuvastatin therapy (20 or 40 mg/day) following MI were analyzed by both LLE and SLE methods and compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The method was successfully validated, demonstrating linearity across a range of 0.1 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL. Compared to the LLE method, SLE achieved superior extraction recovery (96.3 % vs. 60 %) and precision (RSD: 11.9 % vs. 13.6 %) at 0.3 ng/mL rosuvastatin, with a lower absolute matrix effect (12.7 % vs. −36.7 %). Accuracy was comparable (109.3 % vs. 92.8 %). Although SLE involves higher initial costs, it significantly enhances throughput, reduces solvent usage, and minimizes contamination and equipment wear.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study validates SLE as a superior method for quantifying rosuvastatin in plasma, outperforming LLE in recovery, reproducibility, and automation. SLE offers greater accuracy and reliability, making it ideal for high-throughput applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":"36 ","pages":"Pages 29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A rapid method for determination of rosuvastatin in blood plasma with supported liquid extraction\",\"authors\":\"Tjaša Dermota ,&nbsp;Mojca Božič Mijovski ,&nbsp;Jurij Trontelj\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2025.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate measurement of rosuvastatin in plasma is critical for effective patient management and treatment monitoring following myocardial infarction (MI). Expensive solid-phase extraction (SPE) and time-consuming liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) have been established for quantifying rosuvastatin. Supported liquid extraction (SLE) could offer a rapid, cost-effective alternative.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to develop and validate a rapid, cost-effective, accurate, and precise method for quantifying rosuvastatin in high-dose plasma samples from patients following MI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Rosuvastatin was extracted from EDTA plasma using SLE and quantified with LC-MS/MS with positive electrospray ionization. The method was validated according to ICH M10 guidelines, focusing on selectivity, matrix effect, accuracy, precision, linearity, and carryover. Rosuvastatin-D6 was used as an internal standard. Additionally, thirty plasma samples from patients on high-dose rosuvastatin therapy (20 or 40 mg/day) following MI were analyzed by both LLE and SLE methods and compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The method was successfully validated, demonstrating linearity across a range of 0.1 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL. Compared to the LLE method, SLE achieved superior extraction recovery (96.3 % vs. 60 %) and precision (RSD: 11.9 % vs. 13.6 %) at 0.3 ng/mL rosuvastatin, with a lower absolute matrix effect (12.7 % vs. −36.7 %). Accuracy was comparable (109.3 % vs. 92.8 %). Although SLE involves higher initial costs, it significantly enhances throughput, reduces solvent usage, and minimizes contamination and equipment wear.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study validates SLE as a superior method for quantifying rosuvastatin in plasma, outperforming LLE in recovery, reproducibility, and automation. SLE offers greater accuracy and reliability, making it ideal for high-throughput applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 29-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X25000094\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X25000094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确测量血浆瑞舒伐他汀对心肌梗死(MI)后患者的有效管理和治疗监测至关重要。建立了昂贵的固相萃取法(SPE)和耗时的液液萃取法(LLE)来定量瑞舒伐他汀。支持液体萃取(SLE)是一种快速、经济的替代方法。目的建立并验证一种快速、经济、准确、精确的方法,用于急性心肌梗死患者高剂量血浆样品中瑞舒伐他汀的定量。方法采用SLE法从EDTA血浆中提取瑞舒伐他汀,并采用电喷雾正离子化LC-MS/MS定量。根据ICH M10指南对该方法进行验证,重点关注选择性、基质效应、准确度、精密度、线性和结转。以瑞舒伐他汀d6为内标。此外,采用LLE和SLE方法对心肌梗死后接受高剂量瑞舒伐他汀治疗(20或40 mg/天)的患者的30份血浆样本进行分析和比较。结果该方法在0.1 ng/mL ~ 50 ng/mL范围内呈线性关系。与LLE法相比,0.3 ng/mL瑞舒伐他汀的SLE提取回收率(96.3% vs. 60%)和精密度(RSD: 11.9% vs. 13.6%)更高,绝对基质效应更低(12.7% vs.−36.7%)。准确率相当(109.3%对92.8%)。虽然SLE涉及较高的初始成本,但它显著提高了产量,减少了溶剂的使用,并最大限度地减少了污染和设备磨损。结论本研究验证了SLE作为血浆中瑞舒伐他汀定量的优越方法,在回收率、重现性和自动化方面优于LLE。SLE提供更高的准确性和可靠性,使其成为高通量应用的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A rapid method for determination of rosuvastatin in blood plasma with supported liquid extraction

Introduction

Accurate measurement of rosuvastatin in plasma is critical for effective patient management and treatment monitoring following myocardial infarction (MI). Expensive solid-phase extraction (SPE) and time-consuming liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) have been established for quantifying rosuvastatin. Supported liquid extraction (SLE) could offer a rapid, cost-effective alternative.

Objectives

This study aimed to develop and validate a rapid, cost-effective, accurate, and precise method for quantifying rosuvastatin in high-dose plasma samples from patients following MI.

Methods

Rosuvastatin was extracted from EDTA plasma using SLE and quantified with LC-MS/MS with positive electrospray ionization. The method was validated according to ICH M10 guidelines, focusing on selectivity, matrix effect, accuracy, precision, linearity, and carryover. Rosuvastatin-D6 was used as an internal standard. Additionally, thirty plasma samples from patients on high-dose rosuvastatin therapy (20 or 40 mg/day) following MI were analyzed by both LLE and SLE methods and compared.

Results

The method was successfully validated, demonstrating linearity across a range of 0.1 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL. Compared to the LLE method, SLE achieved superior extraction recovery (96.3 % vs. 60 %) and precision (RSD: 11.9 % vs. 13.6 %) at 0.3 ng/mL rosuvastatin, with a lower absolute matrix effect (12.7 % vs. −36.7 %). Accuracy was comparable (109.3 % vs. 92.8 %). Although SLE involves higher initial costs, it significantly enhances throughput, reduces solvent usage, and minimizes contamination and equipment wear.

Conclusion

This study validates SLE as a superior method for quantifying rosuvastatin in plasma, outperforming LLE in recovery, reproducibility, and automation. SLE offers greater accuracy and reliability, making it ideal for high-throughput applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信