{"title":"水下孔口气泡形成的预测模型:机器学习方法和新的半经验模型","authors":"Jiguo Tang, Peng Li, Zhuowei Yi, Liyang Fan, Hongchi Yao, Yong Xu, Jing Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.cej.2025.162485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate prediction of the bubble detachment diameter is crucial for the design and optimization of gas–liquid reactors, boiling systems, and other applications where bubble behavior significantly impacts performance. Traditional models, such as empirical, potential flow theory, and force balance models, often fall short in capturing the complexities inherent in bubble detachment. However, recent advancements in machine learning (ML) present promising alternatives that may overcome these limitations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of advanced ML models, such as Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), in predicting bubble detachment diameter from submerged orifices. A comprehensive database of 1950 data points from 24 sources is utilized to train and test several ML methods, including random forest regression (RFR), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and categorical boosting (CatBoost). Additionally, a new explicit model is developed to account for the effects of orifice diameter and gas flow rate on bubble dynamics. The results demonstrate that the XGBoost model outperforms other methods, achieving the lowest MAE of 3.15 % and RMSE of 0.32 mm, while also offering insights into the key factors influencing bubble detachment. The study also introduces SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretation, providing a deeper understanding of the physical parameters affecting bubble detachment.","PeriodicalId":270,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive modeling of bubble formation from a submerged orifice: Machine learning approaches and a new semi-empirical model\",\"authors\":\"Jiguo Tang, Peng Li, Zhuowei Yi, Liyang Fan, Hongchi Yao, Yong Xu, Jing Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cej.2025.162485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate prediction of the bubble detachment diameter is crucial for the design and optimization of gas–liquid reactors, boiling systems, and other applications where bubble behavior significantly impacts performance. Traditional models, such as empirical, potential flow theory, and force balance models, often fall short in capturing the complexities inherent in bubble detachment. However, recent advancements in machine learning (ML) present promising alternatives that may overcome these limitations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of advanced ML models, such as Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), in predicting bubble detachment diameter from submerged orifices. A comprehensive database of 1950 data points from 24 sources is utilized to train and test several ML methods, including random forest regression (RFR), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and categorical boosting (CatBoost). Additionally, a new explicit model is developed to account for the effects of orifice diameter and gas flow rate on bubble dynamics. The results demonstrate that the XGBoost model outperforms other methods, achieving the lowest MAE of 3.15 % and RMSE of 0.32 mm, while also offering insights into the key factors influencing bubble detachment. The study also introduces SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretation, providing a deeper understanding of the physical parameters affecting bubble detachment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.162485\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.162485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictive modeling of bubble formation from a submerged orifice: Machine learning approaches and a new semi-empirical model
Accurate prediction of the bubble detachment diameter is crucial for the design and optimization of gas–liquid reactors, boiling systems, and other applications where bubble behavior significantly impacts performance. Traditional models, such as empirical, potential flow theory, and force balance models, often fall short in capturing the complexities inherent in bubble detachment. However, recent advancements in machine learning (ML) present promising alternatives that may overcome these limitations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of advanced ML models, such as Kolmogorov–Arnold Network (KAN) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), in predicting bubble detachment diameter from submerged orifices. A comprehensive database of 1950 data points from 24 sources is utilized to train and test several ML methods, including random forest regression (RFR), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and categorical boosting (CatBoost). Additionally, a new explicit model is developed to account for the effects of orifice diameter and gas flow rate on bubble dynamics. The results demonstrate that the XGBoost model outperforms other methods, achieving the lowest MAE of 3.15 % and RMSE of 0.32 mm, while also offering insights into the key factors influencing bubble detachment. The study also introduces SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretation, providing a deeper understanding of the physical parameters affecting bubble detachment.
期刊介绍:
The Chemical Engineering Journal is an international research journal that invites contributions of original and novel fundamental research. It aims to provide an international platform for presenting original fundamental research, interpretative reviews, and discussions on new developments in chemical engineering. The journal welcomes papers that describe novel theory and its practical application, as well as those that demonstrate the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. It also welcomes reports on carefully conducted experimental work that is soundly interpreted. The main focus of the journal is on original and rigorous research results that have broad significance. The Catalysis section within the Chemical Engineering Journal focuses specifically on Experimental and Theoretical studies in the fields of heterogeneous catalysis, molecular catalysis, and biocatalysis. These studies have industrial impact on various sectors such as chemicals, energy, materials, foods, healthcare, and environmental protection.