Shehabaldin Alqalyoobi,Jennifer A Smith,Manoj V Maddali,Janelle Vu Pugashetti,Chad A Newton,John S Kim,Angela L Linderholm,Ching-Hsien Chen,Shwu-Fan Ma,Swaraj Bose,Susan Murray,Ayodeji Adegunsoye,Mary E Strek,Christine Kim Garcia,Paul J Wolters,Fernando J Martinez,Imre Noth,Justin M Oldham
{"title":"非ipf间质性肺疾病存活的蛋白质组学生物标志物。","authors":"Shehabaldin Alqalyoobi,Jennifer A Smith,Manoj V Maddali,Janelle Vu Pugashetti,Chad A Newton,John S Kim,Angela L Linderholm,Ching-Hsien Chen,Shwu-Fan Ma,Swaraj Bose,Susan Murray,Ayodeji Adegunsoye,Mary E Strek,Christine Kim Garcia,Paul J Wolters,Fernando J Martinez,Imre Noth,Justin M Oldham","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202407-1506oc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE\r\nWhile idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been widely studied, progressive non-IPF interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo identify and validate proteomic biomarkers of non-IPF ILD survival.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nHigh-throughput proteomic data were generated using plasma collected as part of prospective registries at the Universities of California and Texas (discovery cohort, n=676) and PRECISIONS multi-omic study (validation cohort, n=616). Proteins associated with three-year transplant-free survival (TFS) were identified using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, and those associated with TFS after adjustment for false discovery were advanced for validation cohort testing. Pathway analysis was performed to identify molecular pathways unique to non-IPF ILD and shared with IPF.\r\n\r\nMAIN RESULTS\r\nOf 2925 proteins tested in the discovery cohort, 73 were associated with TFS, with 44 showing sustained TFS association in the validation cohort. The top TFS-associated proteins were amphiregulin (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.07-3.04), integrin subunit beta 6 (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.95-3.10) and keratin 19 (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.47-1.98). All but one validated biomarkers showed consistent TFS association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. Pathway analysis identified several molecular pathways shared with IPF, along with three pathways unique to non-IPF ILD.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe identified and validated novel prognostic protein biomarkers in non-IPF ILD, most of which showed consistent association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. While most biomarkers and molecular pathways identified were previously linked to IPF, several were unique to non-IPF ILD, suggesting that unique biology may contribute to progressive non-IPF ILD.","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proteomic Biomarkers of Survival in Non-IPF Interstitial Lung Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Shehabaldin Alqalyoobi,Jennifer A Smith,Manoj V Maddali,Janelle Vu Pugashetti,Chad A Newton,John S Kim,Angela L Linderholm,Ching-Hsien Chen,Shwu-Fan Ma,Swaraj Bose,Susan Murray,Ayodeji Adegunsoye,Mary E Strek,Christine Kim Garcia,Paul J Wolters,Fernando J Martinez,Imre Noth,Justin M Oldham\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/rccm.202407-1506oc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RATIONALE\\r\\nWhile idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been widely studied, progressive non-IPF interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo identify and validate proteomic biomarkers of non-IPF ILD survival.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nHigh-throughput proteomic data were generated using plasma collected as part of prospective registries at the Universities of California and Texas (discovery cohort, n=676) and PRECISIONS multi-omic study (validation cohort, n=616). Proteins associated with three-year transplant-free survival (TFS) were identified using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, and those associated with TFS after adjustment for false discovery were advanced for validation cohort testing. Pathway analysis was performed to identify molecular pathways unique to non-IPF ILD and shared with IPF.\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN RESULTS\\r\\nOf 2925 proteins tested in the discovery cohort, 73 were associated with TFS, with 44 showing sustained TFS association in the validation cohort. The top TFS-associated proteins were amphiregulin (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.07-3.04), integrin subunit beta 6 (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.95-3.10) and keratin 19 (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.47-1.98). All but one validated biomarkers showed consistent TFS association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. Pathway analysis identified several molecular pathways shared with IPF, along with three pathways unique to non-IPF ILD.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nWe identified and validated novel prognostic protein biomarkers in non-IPF ILD, most of which showed consistent association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. While most biomarkers and molecular pathways identified were previously linked to IPF, several were unique to non-IPF ILD, suggesting that unique biology may contribute to progressive non-IPF ILD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202407-1506oc\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202407-1506oc","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Proteomic Biomarkers of Survival in Non-IPF Interstitial Lung Disease.
RATIONALE
While idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been widely studied, progressive non-IPF interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE
To identify and validate proteomic biomarkers of non-IPF ILD survival.
METHODS
High-throughput proteomic data were generated using plasma collected as part of prospective registries at the Universities of California and Texas (discovery cohort, n=676) and PRECISIONS multi-omic study (validation cohort, n=616). Proteins associated with three-year transplant-free survival (TFS) were identified using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, and those associated with TFS after adjustment for false discovery were advanced for validation cohort testing. Pathway analysis was performed to identify molecular pathways unique to non-IPF ILD and shared with IPF.
MAIN RESULTS
Of 2925 proteins tested in the discovery cohort, 73 were associated with TFS, with 44 showing sustained TFS association in the validation cohort. The top TFS-associated proteins were amphiregulin (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.07-3.04), integrin subunit beta 6 (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.95-3.10) and keratin 19 (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.47-1.98). All but one validated biomarkers showed consistent TFS association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. Pathway analysis identified several molecular pathways shared with IPF, along with three pathways unique to non-IPF ILD.
CONCLUSIONS
We identified and validated novel prognostic protein biomarkers in non-IPF ILD, most of which showed consistent association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. While most biomarkers and molecular pathways identified were previously linked to IPF, several were unique to non-IPF ILD, suggesting that unique biology may contribute to progressive non-IPF ILD.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.