非ipf间质性肺疾病存活的蛋白质组学生物标志物。

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Shehabaldin Alqalyoobi,Jennifer A Smith,Manoj V Maddali,Janelle Vu Pugashetti,Chad A Newton,John S Kim,Angela L Linderholm,Ching-Hsien Chen,Shwu-Fan Ma,Swaraj Bose,Susan Murray,Ayodeji Adegunsoye,Mary E Strek,Christine Kim Garcia,Paul J Wolters,Fernando J Martinez,Imre Noth,Justin M Oldham
{"title":"非ipf间质性肺疾病存活的蛋白质组学生物标志物。","authors":"Shehabaldin Alqalyoobi,Jennifer A Smith,Manoj V Maddali,Janelle Vu Pugashetti,Chad A Newton,John S Kim,Angela L Linderholm,Ching-Hsien Chen,Shwu-Fan Ma,Swaraj Bose,Susan Murray,Ayodeji Adegunsoye,Mary E Strek,Christine Kim Garcia,Paul J Wolters,Fernando J Martinez,Imre Noth,Justin M Oldham","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202407-1506oc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE\r\nWhile idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been widely studied, progressive non-IPF interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo identify and validate proteomic biomarkers of non-IPF ILD survival.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nHigh-throughput proteomic data were generated using plasma collected as part of prospective registries at the Universities of California and Texas (discovery cohort, n=676) and PRECISIONS multi-omic study (validation cohort, n=616). Proteins associated with three-year transplant-free survival (TFS) were identified using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, and those associated with TFS after adjustment for false discovery were advanced for validation cohort testing. Pathway analysis was performed to identify molecular pathways unique to non-IPF ILD and shared with IPF.\r\n\r\nMAIN RESULTS\r\nOf 2925 proteins tested in the discovery cohort, 73 were associated with TFS, with 44 showing sustained TFS association in the validation cohort. The top TFS-associated proteins were amphiregulin (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.07-3.04), integrin subunit beta 6 (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.95-3.10) and keratin 19 (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.47-1.98). All but one validated biomarkers showed consistent TFS association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. Pathway analysis identified several molecular pathways shared with IPF, along with three pathways unique to non-IPF ILD.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe identified and validated novel prognostic protein biomarkers in non-IPF ILD, most of which showed consistent association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. While most biomarkers and molecular pathways identified were previously linked to IPF, several were unique to non-IPF ILD, suggesting that unique biology may contribute to progressive non-IPF ILD.","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proteomic Biomarkers of Survival in Non-IPF Interstitial Lung Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Shehabaldin Alqalyoobi,Jennifer A Smith,Manoj V Maddali,Janelle Vu Pugashetti,Chad A Newton,John S Kim,Angela L Linderholm,Ching-Hsien Chen,Shwu-Fan Ma,Swaraj Bose,Susan Murray,Ayodeji Adegunsoye,Mary E Strek,Christine Kim Garcia,Paul J Wolters,Fernando J Martinez,Imre Noth,Justin M Oldham\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/rccm.202407-1506oc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RATIONALE\\r\\nWhile idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been widely studied, progressive non-IPF interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo identify and validate proteomic biomarkers of non-IPF ILD survival.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nHigh-throughput proteomic data were generated using plasma collected as part of prospective registries at the Universities of California and Texas (discovery cohort, n=676) and PRECISIONS multi-omic study (validation cohort, n=616). Proteins associated with three-year transplant-free survival (TFS) were identified using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, and those associated with TFS after adjustment for false discovery were advanced for validation cohort testing. Pathway analysis was performed to identify molecular pathways unique to non-IPF ILD and shared with IPF.\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN RESULTS\\r\\nOf 2925 proteins tested in the discovery cohort, 73 were associated with TFS, with 44 showing sustained TFS association in the validation cohort. The top TFS-associated proteins were amphiregulin (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.07-3.04), integrin subunit beta 6 (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.95-3.10) and keratin 19 (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.47-1.98). All but one validated biomarkers showed consistent TFS association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. Pathway analysis identified several molecular pathways shared with IPF, along with three pathways unique to non-IPF ILD.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nWe identified and validated novel prognostic protein biomarkers in non-IPF ILD, most of which showed consistent association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. While most biomarkers and molecular pathways identified were previously linked to IPF, several were unique to non-IPF ILD, suggesting that unique biology may contribute to progressive non-IPF ILD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202407-1506oc\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202407-1506oc","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景虽然特发性肺纤维化(IPF)已被广泛研究,但对进行性非 IPF 间质性肺病(ILD)的了解仍然很少。目的识别并验证非 IPF ILD 存活的蛋白质组生物标志物。方法利用加利福尼亚大学和德克萨斯大学前瞻性登记(发现队列,人数=676)和 PRECISIONS 多队列研究(验证队列,人数=616)收集的血浆生成高通量蛋白质组数据。使用多变量考克斯比例危险回归法确定了与三年无移植生存率(TFS)相关的蛋白质,并将那些经错误发现调整后与三年无移植生存率相关的蛋白质推进到验证队列测试中。主要结果 在发现队列检测的 2925 个蛋白质中,73 个与 TFS 相关,其中 44 个在验证队列中显示出持续的 TFS 相关性。与 TFS 相关性最高的蛋白质是两性胰蛋白酶(HR 2.51,95% CI 2.07-3.04)、整合素亚基 beta 6(HR 2.46;95% CI 1.95-3.10)和角蛋白 19(HR 1.70,95% CI 1.47-1.98)。除一个有效生物标志物外,其他所有生物标志物在非 IPF ILD 亚型中均显示出一致的 TFS 关联性。结论 我们发现并验证了非 IPF ILD 中的新型预后蛋白生物标记物,其中大多数在非 IPF ILD 亚型中显示出一致的相关性。虽然大多数生物标志物和分子通路以前都与 IPF 相关,但有几个生物标志物和分子通路是非 IPF ILD 所独有的,这表明独特的生物学特性可能会导致非 IPF ILD 的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proteomic Biomarkers of Survival in Non-IPF Interstitial Lung Disease.
RATIONALE While idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been widely studied, progressive non-IPF interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To identify and validate proteomic biomarkers of non-IPF ILD survival. METHODS High-throughput proteomic data were generated using plasma collected as part of prospective registries at the Universities of California and Texas (discovery cohort, n=676) and PRECISIONS multi-omic study (validation cohort, n=616). Proteins associated with three-year transplant-free survival (TFS) were identified using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, and those associated with TFS after adjustment for false discovery were advanced for validation cohort testing. Pathway analysis was performed to identify molecular pathways unique to non-IPF ILD and shared with IPF. MAIN RESULTS Of 2925 proteins tested in the discovery cohort, 73 were associated with TFS, with 44 showing sustained TFS association in the validation cohort. The top TFS-associated proteins were amphiregulin (HR 2.51, 95% CI 2.07-3.04), integrin subunit beta 6 (HR 2.46; 95% CI 1.95-3.10) and keratin 19 (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.47-1.98). All but one validated biomarkers showed consistent TFS association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. Pathway analysis identified several molecular pathways shared with IPF, along with three pathways unique to non-IPF ILD. CONCLUSIONS We identified and validated novel prognostic protein biomarkers in non-IPF ILD, most of which showed consistent association across non-IPF ILD subtypes. While most biomarkers and molecular pathways identified were previously linked to IPF, several were unique to non-IPF ILD, suggesting that unique biology may contribute to progressive non-IPF ILD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信