{"title":"昔妥珠单抗替鲁莫替康治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌:一项随机3期试验","authors":"Yongmei Yin, Ying Fan, Quchang Ouyang, Lihua Song, Xiaojia Wang, Wei Li, Man Li, Xi Yan, Shusen Wang, Tao Sun, Yuee Teng, Xianjun Tang, Zhongsheng Tong, Zhengkui Sun, Junyou Ge, Xiaoping Jin, Yina Diao, Gesha Liu, Binghe Xu","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03630-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chemotherapy remains a standard treatment option for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but is associated with limited survival. Although some targeted antibody–drug conjugates have demonstrated clinical benefits and are considered standard therapy, persistent unmet medical needs remain due to varying accessibility. The OptiTROP-Breast01 phase 3 trial assessed sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) versus chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC who had received two or more prior therapies, including at least one for metastatic disease. Patients were randomized to sac-TMT (<i>n</i> = 130) or chemotherapy (<i>n</i> = 133). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) was met based on the protocol-specified interim analysis. At final analysis, the median PFS by BICR was 6.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5–8.0) months with sac-TMT and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.7–2.7) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR), 0.32; 95% CI, 0.24–0.44; <i>P</i> < 0.00001). Concurrently, at the protocol-specified interim analysis for overall survival (OS), the median OS was not reached (95% CI, 11.2 months to not estimable (NE)) with sac-TMT and 9.4 (95% CI, 8.5–11.7) months with chemotherapy (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36–0.78; <i>P</i> = 0.0005). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 45.4% with sac-TMT and 12.0% with chemotherapy. The median duration of response was 7.1 (95% CI, 5.6–NE) months with sac-TMT and 3.0 (95% CI, 2.5–NE) months with chemotherapy. The most common treatment-related adverse event with sac-TMT was hematologic toxicity. Sac-TMT demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS compared to chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile. The study findings support sac-TMT as an additional effective treatment option for pretreated metastatic TNBC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05347134.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sacituzumab tirumotecan in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial\",\"authors\":\"Yongmei Yin, Ying Fan, Quchang Ouyang, Lihua Song, Xiaojia Wang, Wei Li, Man Li, Xi Yan, Shusen Wang, Tao Sun, Yuee Teng, Xianjun Tang, Zhongsheng Tong, Zhengkui Sun, Junyou Ge, Xiaoping Jin, Yina Diao, Gesha Liu, Binghe Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03630-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Chemotherapy remains a standard treatment option for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but is associated with limited survival. Although some targeted antibody–drug conjugates have demonstrated clinical benefits and are considered standard therapy, persistent unmet medical needs remain due to varying accessibility. The OptiTROP-Breast01 phase 3 trial assessed sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) versus chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC who had received two or more prior therapies, including at least one for metastatic disease. Patients were randomized to sac-TMT (<i>n</i> = 130) or chemotherapy (<i>n</i> = 133). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) was met based on the protocol-specified interim analysis. At final analysis, the median PFS by BICR was 6.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5–8.0) months with sac-TMT and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.7–2.7) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR), 0.32; 95% CI, 0.24–0.44; <i>P</i> < 0.00001). Concurrently, at the protocol-specified interim analysis for overall survival (OS), the median OS was not reached (95% CI, 11.2 months to not estimable (NE)) with sac-TMT and 9.4 (95% CI, 8.5–11.7) months with chemotherapy (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36–0.78; <i>P</i> = 0.0005). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 45.4% with sac-TMT and 12.0% with chemotherapy. The median duration of response was 7.1 (95% CI, 5.6–NE) months with sac-TMT and 3.0 (95% CI, 2.5–NE) months with chemotherapy. The most common treatment-related adverse event with sac-TMT was hematologic toxicity. Sac-TMT demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS compared to chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile. The study findings support sac-TMT as an additional effective treatment option for pretreated metastatic TNBC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05347134.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03630-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03630-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sacituzumab tirumotecan in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial
Chemotherapy remains a standard treatment option for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but is associated with limited survival. Although some targeted antibody–drug conjugates have demonstrated clinical benefits and are considered standard therapy, persistent unmet medical needs remain due to varying accessibility. The OptiTROP-Breast01 phase 3 trial assessed sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) versus chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC who had received two or more prior therapies, including at least one for metastatic disease. Patients were randomized to sac-TMT (n = 130) or chemotherapy (n = 133). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) was met based on the protocol-specified interim analysis. At final analysis, the median PFS by BICR was 6.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5–8.0) months with sac-TMT and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.7–2.7) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR), 0.32; 95% CI, 0.24–0.44; P < 0.00001). Concurrently, at the protocol-specified interim analysis for overall survival (OS), the median OS was not reached (95% CI, 11.2 months to not estimable (NE)) with sac-TMT and 9.4 (95% CI, 8.5–11.7) months with chemotherapy (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36–0.78; P = 0.0005). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 45.4% with sac-TMT and 12.0% with chemotherapy. The median duration of response was 7.1 (95% CI, 5.6–NE) months with sac-TMT and 3.0 (95% CI, 2.5–NE) months with chemotherapy. The most common treatment-related adverse event with sac-TMT was hematologic toxicity. Sac-TMT demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS compared to chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile. The study findings support sac-TMT as an additional effective treatment option for pretreated metastatic TNBC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05347134.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.