{"title":"一种新型免疫原性猫红细胞抗原(FEA 6)的流行以及 FEA 之间的表达模式","authors":"Félix Bajon, Julie Arsenault, Marie Claude Blais","doi":"10.1111/jvim.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>After the identification of five novel feline erythrocyte antigens (FEAs) and evidence establishing FEA 1's immunogenicity, attempts to sensitize a cat to FEA 4 unexpectedly resulted in the production of alloantibodies directed against an unknown antigen, named FEA 6.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To estimate the prevalence of FEA 6 as a presumably new antigen, identify corresponding naturally occurring alloantibodies (NOAb), and investigate the associations between known FEAs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundread and seven cats.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective blood typing for FEAs 1–6 was conducted in Type A cats (<i>n</i> = 193), followed by serial crossmatching in groups of 3–7 cats to detect NOAb and identify their target FEA. Agreement between FEA 6 blood typing and other FEAs was assessed. Associations between FEAs were evaluated to identify expression patterns.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 193 Type A cats, 67% were FEA 6-positive. Agreement analyses were supportive of FEA 6 being distinct from FEAs 1–5. NOAb were detected in 11 cats (5.7%), none of which were anti-FEA 6. Only FEA 1-negative status was significantly associated with the presence of NOAb (OR = 6.6, 95% CI, 1.9–23.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Significant associations were observed between the expressions of FEAs 1 and 4 (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 25.7, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and FEAs 3 and 5 (Fisher's exact test, <i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\n \n <p>The immunogenicity and prevalence of the newly discovered FEA 6 raise concerns regarding its clinical relevance and role in posttransfusion sensitization. FEA 1/FEA 4 and FEA 3/FEA 5 pairs might belong to distinct antigenic systems.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of a Novel Immunogenic Feline Erythrocyte Antigen (FEA 6) and Expression Patterns Between FEAs\",\"authors\":\"Félix Bajon, Julie Arsenault, Marie Claude Blais\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvim.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>After the identification of five novel feline erythrocyte antigens (FEAs) and evidence establishing FEA 1's immunogenicity, attempts to sensitize a cat to FEA 4 unexpectedly resulted in the production of alloantibodies directed against an unknown antigen, named FEA 6.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To estimate the prevalence of FEA 6 as a presumably new antigen, identify corresponding naturally occurring alloantibodies (NOAb), and investigate the associations between known FEAs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Animals</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two hundread and seven cats.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prospective blood typing for FEAs 1–6 was conducted in Type A cats (<i>n</i> = 193), followed by serial crossmatching in groups of 3–7 cats to detect NOAb and identify their target FEA. Agreement between FEA 6 blood typing and other FEAs was assessed. Associations between FEAs were evaluated to identify expression patterns.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 193 Type A cats, 67% were FEA 6-positive. Agreement analyses were supportive of FEA 6 being distinct from FEAs 1–5. NOAb were detected in 11 cats (5.7%), none of which were anti-FEA 6. Only FEA 1-negative status was significantly associated with the presence of NOAb (OR = 6.6, 95% CI, 1.9–23.1; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Significant associations were observed between the expressions of FEAs 1 and 4 (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 25.7, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and FEAs 3 and 5 (Fisher's exact test, <i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\\n \\n <p>The immunogenicity and prevalence of the newly discovered FEA 6 raise concerns regarding its clinical relevance and role in posttransfusion sensitization. FEA 1/FEA 4 and FEA 3/FEA 5 pairs might belong to distinct antigenic systems.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.70094\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.70094\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.70094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence of a Novel Immunogenic Feline Erythrocyte Antigen (FEA 6) and Expression Patterns Between FEAs
Background
After the identification of five novel feline erythrocyte antigens (FEAs) and evidence establishing FEA 1's immunogenicity, attempts to sensitize a cat to FEA 4 unexpectedly resulted in the production of alloantibodies directed against an unknown antigen, named FEA 6.
Objectives
To estimate the prevalence of FEA 6 as a presumably new antigen, identify corresponding naturally occurring alloantibodies (NOAb), and investigate the associations between known FEAs.
Animals
Two hundread and seven cats.
Methods
Prospective blood typing for FEAs 1–6 was conducted in Type A cats (n = 193), followed by serial crossmatching in groups of 3–7 cats to detect NOAb and identify their target FEA. Agreement between FEA 6 blood typing and other FEAs was assessed. Associations between FEAs were evaluated to identify expression patterns.
Results
Among 193 Type A cats, 67% were FEA 6-positive. Agreement analyses were supportive of FEA 6 being distinct from FEAs 1–5. NOAb were detected in 11 cats (5.7%), none of which were anti-FEA 6. Only FEA 1-negative status was significantly associated with the presence of NOAb (OR = 6.6, 95% CI, 1.9–23.1; p < 0.001). Significant associations were observed between the expressions of FEAs 1 and 4 (χ2 = 25.7, p < 0.001), and FEAs 3 and 5 (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001), respectively.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
The immunogenicity and prevalence of the newly discovered FEA 6 raise concerns regarding its clinical relevance and role in posttransfusion sensitization. FEA 1/FEA 4 and FEA 3/FEA 5 pairs might belong to distinct antigenic systems.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.