腿转还是下转?正统还是非正统?-深入研究国际和特许经营T20板球的保龄球-击球比赛和旋转变化的有效性

Samuel Kerruish, Allistair McRobert, Mikael Jamil
{"title":"腿转还是下转?正统还是非正统?-深入研究国际和特许经营T20板球的保龄球-击球比赛和旋转变化的有效性","authors":"Samuel Kerruish,&nbsp;Allistair McRobert,&nbsp;Mikael Jamil","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, 23,084 balls bowled by elite level spin bowlers across six competitions were analysed in order to fulfil two main aims; (1) investigate whether the type of spin bowler presents any tactical advantages and (2) investigate the most effective type of spin bowling variation. The results of logistic regression analyses revealed significant relationships between specific bowler–batter match-ups and runs conceded (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Specifically, opposing match-ups where the ball naturally spins away from right-handed and left-handed batters were revealed to be a particularly effective strategy at restricting runs conceded. Right-handed leg-spin bowlers are revealed to be significantly more likely to take the wickets of right-handed batters. Results also revealed that the ‘googly’ and ‘carrom ball’ variations are particularly effective at both, restricting runs scored and taking wickets when they are bowled to right-handed batters (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Evidence suggests that certain bowler–batter match-ups present some tactical advantages and should therefore be taken into consideration in T20 cricket. Furthermore, the results also highlight the value of a wrist spinner capable of bowling ‘googly’ or ‘carrom ball’ variations. The findings of this study could potentially influence team selection, strategies, recruitment policy and general coaching practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12296","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leg Spin or Off Spin? Orthodox or Unorthodox?—An In-Depth Examination of Bowling–Batting Match-Ups and the Effectiveness of Spin Variations in International and Franchise T20 Cricket\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Kerruish,&nbsp;Allistair McRobert,&nbsp;Mikael Jamil\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, 23,084 balls bowled by elite level spin bowlers across six competitions were analysed in order to fulfil two main aims; (1) investigate whether the type of spin bowler presents any tactical advantages and (2) investigate the most effective type of spin bowling variation. The results of logistic regression analyses revealed significant relationships between specific bowler–batter match-ups and runs conceded (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Specifically, opposing match-ups where the ball naturally spins away from right-handed and left-handed batters were revealed to be a particularly effective strategy at restricting runs conceded. Right-handed leg-spin bowlers are revealed to be significantly more likely to take the wickets of right-handed batters. Results also revealed that the ‘googly’ and ‘carrom ball’ variations are particularly effective at both, restricting runs scored and taking wickets when they are bowled to right-handed batters (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Evidence suggests that certain bowler–batter match-ups present some tactical advantages and should therefore be taken into consideration in T20 cricket. Furthermore, the results also highlight the value of a wrist spinner capable of bowling ‘googly’ or ‘carrom ball’ variations. The findings of this study could potentially influence team selection, strategies, recruitment policy and general coaching practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12296\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,为了实现两个主要目标,分析了六项比赛中精英水平的旋转投球手打出的23,084个球;(1)调查旋转保龄球类型是否具有任何战术优势;(2)调查最有效的旋转保龄球类型变化。逻辑回归分析的结果揭示了特定的投球手与击球手对位与失分之间的显著关系(p <;0.001)。具体来说,当球从右手击球手和左手击球手那里自然旋转时,对方的对位被发现是一种特别有效的限制失分的策略。研究显示,右撇子投球手更有可能打右撇子击球手的三柱球。研究结果还显示,“googly”和“carrom ball”的变化在这两种情况下都特别有效,限制得分,并在投球给右手击球手时采取三柱球(p <;0.001)。有证据表明,某些投球手和击球手的对位表现出一些战术优势,因此应该在T20板球比赛中加以考虑。此外,研究结果还强调了手腕旋转器能够打出“googly”或“carrom ball”变化的价值。本研究的结果可能会影响球队的选择、策略、招聘政策和一般的教练实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Leg Spin or Off Spin? Orthodox or Unorthodox?—An In-Depth Examination of Bowling–Batting Match-Ups and the Effectiveness of Spin Variations in International and Franchise T20 Cricket

Leg Spin or Off Spin? Orthodox or Unorthodox?—An In-Depth Examination of Bowling–Batting Match-Ups and the Effectiveness of Spin Variations in International and Franchise T20 Cricket

In this study, 23,084 balls bowled by elite level spin bowlers across six competitions were analysed in order to fulfil two main aims; (1) investigate whether the type of spin bowler presents any tactical advantages and (2) investigate the most effective type of spin bowling variation. The results of logistic regression analyses revealed significant relationships between specific bowler–batter match-ups and runs conceded (p < 0.001). Specifically, opposing match-ups where the ball naturally spins away from right-handed and left-handed batters were revealed to be a particularly effective strategy at restricting runs conceded. Right-handed leg-spin bowlers are revealed to be significantly more likely to take the wickets of right-handed batters. Results also revealed that the ‘googly’ and ‘carrom ball’ variations are particularly effective at both, restricting runs scored and taking wickets when they are bowled to right-handed batters (both p < 0.001). Evidence suggests that certain bowler–batter match-ups present some tactical advantages and should therefore be taken into consideration in T20 cricket. Furthermore, the results also highlight the value of a wrist spinner capable of bowling ‘googly’ or ‘carrom ball’ variations. The findings of this study could potentially influence team selection, strategies, recruitment policy and general coaching practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信