次级共情作为分类过程

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1111/ele.70108
Sean A. S. Anderson, Daniel R. Matute
{"title":"次级共情作为分类过程","authors":"Sean A. S. Anderson,&nbsp;Daniel R. Matute","doi":"10.1111/ele.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A much remarked-upon pattern in nature is elevated trait disparity in sympatric relative to allopatric populations or species. Early explanations focused on secondary contact between allopatrically speciating taxa and emphasised adaptive divergence driven by costly interactions in sympatry (i.e., ‘character displacement’). Here we consider a related hypothesis, ‘species sorting’, which describes a bias in the outcome of secondary contact wherein lineages are unlikely to establish sympatry unless and until they evolve sufficient trait differences in allopatry. Sorting-like processes are prevalent in community assembly theory but are more seldom discussed in the context of speciation and secondary sympatry. We first define ecological and reproductive species sorting as analogous to ecological and reproductive character displacement, and we synthesise ‘differential fusion’ and the ‘Templeton effect’ within this framework. Through the logic of coexistence and assembly theories, we distinguish the types of allopatry-derived trait differences that will likely promote sympatry from those that likely will not, and we discuss biogeographic consequences of the latter. We then highlight new empirical approaches to distinguish sorting from displacement and survey the mixed evidence to-date. We finally suggest key priorities for future research into the hypothesized role of species sorting as a generator of major biodiversity patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70108","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary Sympatry as a Sorting Process\",\"authors\":\"Sean A. S. Anderson,&nbsp;Daniel R. Matute\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ele.70108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A much remarked-upon pattern in nature is elevated trait disparity in sympatric relative to allopatric populations or species. Early explanations focused on secondary contact between allopatrically speciating taxa and emphasised adaptive divergence driven by costly interactions in sympatry (i.e., ‘character displacement’). Here we consider a related hypothesis, ‘species sorting’, which describes a bias in the outcome of secondary contact wherein lineages are unlikely to establish sympatry unless and until they evolve sufficient trait differences in allopatry. Sorting-like processes are prevalent in community assembly theory but are more seldom discussed in the context of speciation and secondary sympatry. We first define ecological and reproductive species sorting as analogous to ecological and reproductive character displacement, and we synthesise ‘differential fusion’ and the ‘Templeton effect’ within this framework. Through the logic of coexistence and assembly theories, we distinguish the types of allopatry-derived trait differences that will likely promote sympatry from those that likely will not, and we discuss biogeographic consequences of the latter. We then highlight new empirical approaches to distinguish sorting from displacement and survey the mixed evidence to-date. We finally suggest key priorities for future research into the hypothesized role of species sorting as a generator of major biodiversity patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.70108\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70108\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.70108","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然界中一个备受关注的模式是同域种群或物种相对于异域种群或物种的性状差异升高。早期的解释侧重于异域物种类群之间的二次接触,并强调由同属物种中代价高昂的相互作用驱动的适应性分化(即“特征位移”)。在这里,我们考虑了一个相关的假设,“物种分类”,它描述了二级接触结果的偏见,其中谱系不太可能建立共情,除非它们在异族中进化出足够的特征差异。类分选过程在群落聚集理论中很普遍,但很少在物种形成和次级同属的背景下讨论。我们首先将生态和生殖物种分类定义为类似于生态和生殖特征位移,并在此框架内综合了“差异融合”和“邓普顿效应”。通过共存和组合理论的逻辑,我们区分了同种异种衍生的性状差异的类型,这些类型可能会促进同族关系,而那些可能不会,我们讨论了后者的生物地理学后果。然后,我们强调了新的经验方法来区分排序和位移,并调查了迄今为止的混合证据。最后,我们提出了未来研究物种分选作为主要生物多样性模式产生器的假设作用的关键优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Secondary Sympatry as a Sorting Process

Secondary Sympatry as a Sorting Process

A much remarked-upon pattern in nature is elevated trait disparity in sympatric relative to allopatric populations or species. Early explanations focused on secondary contact between allopatrically speciating taxa and emphasised adaptive divergence driven by costly interactions in sympatry (i.e., ‘character displacement’). Here we consider a related hypothesis, ‘species sorting’, which describes a bias in the outcome of secondary contact wherein lineages are unlikely to establish sympatry unless and until they evolve sufficient trait differences in allopatry. Sorting-like processes are prevalent in community assembly theory but are more seldom discussed in the context of speciation and secondary sympatry. We first define ecological and reproductive species sorting as analogous to ecological and reproductive character displacement, and we synthesise ‘differential fusion’ and the ‘Templeton effect’ within this framework. Through the logic of coexistence and assembly theories, we distinguish the types of allopatry-derived trait differences that will likely promote sympatry from those that likely will not, and we discuss biogeographic consequences of the latter. We then highlight new empirical approaches to distinguish sorting from displacement and survey the mixed evidence to-date. We finally suggest key priorities for future research into the hypothesized role of species sorting as a generator of major biodiversity patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信