欧洲农业决策支持工具:需要什么样的工具来促进土壤健康?

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Dylan Warren Raffa, Timo A. Räsänen, Alessandra Trinchera, Meriem Jouini, Sofia Delin, Raimonds Kasparinskis, Baiba Dirnēna, Zeynep Demir, Ülfet Erdal, Marjoleine Hanegraaf
{"title":"欧洲农业决策支持工具:需要什么样的工具来促进土壤健康?","authors":"Dylan Warren Raffa,&nbsp;Timo A. Räsänen,&nbsp;Alessandra Trinchera,&nbsp;Meriem Jouini,&nbsp;Sofia Delin,&nbsp;Raimonds Kasparinskis,&nbsp;Baiba Dirnēna,&nbsp;Zeynep Demir,&nbsp;Ülfet Erdal,&nbsp;Marjoleine Hanegraaf","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Decision support tools (DSTs) are crucial in aiding agricultural decision-making, particularly in improving soil health by enhancing nutrient management, soil organic matter (SOM) and water retention. Despite the availability of numerous DSTs in Europe, their adoption, effectiveness and development needs are not well understood, as most research is based on literature reviews rather than direct feedback from stakeholders. This study aims at filling this gap by conducting an expert survey of the most widely used digital DSTs across Europe on SOM, water retention and nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. We aimed at evaluating the current use, limitations and development needs of DSTs and offering recommendations to improve the effectiveness and adoption of DSTs in the context of soil health. A questionnaire was distributed to experts in 24 countries. Answers were received from 18 countries, including 14 European Union (EU) nations, Norway, the UK, Switzerland and Turkey. A total of 115 DSTs were identified aligning with our definition of DST, with agronomists, consultants and farmers being the primary users. Adoption of DSTs was rated moderate (score: 3.1/5), with tools featuring user-friendly interfaces and alignment with farmer goals achieving higher adoption rates. DSTs were rated better suited to achieve farm-level goals (score: 4.1/5) than regional (score: 3.6/5) or national objectives (score: 3.5/5). Major barriers to adoption included limited end-user involvement in DST development, which may hinder alignment with practical needs. Considering all the received questionnaires, the most frequently cited areas for improvement were nutrient use efficiency (45%), SOM (24%) and water retention (18%). Respondents emphasised the need for better integration of new farming systems (e.g., organic farming, agroforestry), more detailed process descriptions, integration of multiple processes, inclusion of economic modules and improved user interfaces. This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of DSTs in Europe, revealing a diverse yet moderately adopted landscape. Increasing user engagement, enhancing technical integration and improving accessibility are essential for promoting a wider use of DSTs to improve soil health. By adopting these recommendations, DSTs can play a key role in achieving the EU's sustainability goals, fostering resilient agricultural systems and addressing environmental challenges such as soil degradation and climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agricultural Decision Support Tools in Europe: What Kind of Tools Are Needed to Foster Soil Health?\",\"authors\":\"Dylan Warren Raffa,&nbsp;Timo A. Räsänen,&nbsp;Alessandra Trinchera,&nbsp;Meriem Jouini,&nbsp;Sofia Delin,&nbsp;Raimonds Kasparinskis,&nbsp;Baiba Dirnēna,&nbsp;Zeynep Demir,&nbsp;Ülfet Erdal,&nbsp;Marjoleine Hanegraaf\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Decision support tools (DSTs) are crucial in aiding agricultural decision-making, particularly in improving soil health by enhancing nutrient management, soil organic matter (SOM) and water retention. Despite the availability of numerous DSTs in Europe, their adoption, effectiveness and development needs are not well understood, as most research is based on literature reviews rather than direct feedback from stakeholders. This study aims at filling this gap by conducting an expert survey of the most widely used digital DSTs across Europe on SOM, water retention and nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. We aimed at evaluating the current use, limitations and development needs of DSTs and offering recommendations to improve the effectiveness and adoption of DSTs in the context of soil health. A questionnaire was distributed to experts in 24 countries. Answers were received from 18 countries, including 14 European Union (EU) nations, Norway, the UK, Switzerland and Turkey. A total of 115 DSTs were identified aligning with our definition of DST, with agronomists, consultants and farmers being the primary users. Adoption of DSTs was rated moderate (score: 3.1/5), with tools featuring user-friendly interfaces and alignment with farmer goals achieving higher adoption rates. DSTs were rated better suited to achieve farm-level goals (score: 4.1/5) than regional (score: 3.6/5) or national objectives (score: 3.5/5). Major barriers to adoption included limited end-user involvement in DST development, which may hinder alignment with practical needs. Considering all the received questionnaires, the most frequently cited areas for improvement were nutrient use efficiency (45%), SOM (24%) and water retention (18%). Respondents emphasised the need for better integration of new farming systems (e.g., organic farming, agroforestry), more detailed process descriptions, integration of multiple processes, inclusion of economic modules and improved user interfaces. This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of DSTs in Europe, revealing a diverse yet moderately adopted landscape. Increasing user engagement, enhancing technical integration and improving accessibility are essential for promoting a wider use of DSTs to improve soil health. By adopting these recommendations, DSTs can play a key role in achieving the EU's sustainability goals, fostering resilient agricultural systems and addressing environmental challenges such as soil degradation and climate change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"76 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70097\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70097\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

决策支持工具(DSTs)在协助农业决策方面至关重要,特别是通过加强养分管理、土壤有机质(SOM)和保水来改善土壤健康。尽管欧洲有许多DSTs,但由于大多数研究是基于文献综述而不是利益相关者的直接反馈,因此对其采用、有效性和发展需求的了解并不充分。本研究旨在通过对欧洲最广泛使用的数字DSTs进行专家调查,以填补这一空白,调查内容涉及农业中的SOM、保水和养分利用效率。我们的目的是评估目前的使用、限制和发展需要的滴滴涕,并提出建议,以提高土壤健康背景下滴滴涕的有效性和采用。向24个国家的专家分发了一份调查表。调查收到了来自18个国家的答案,其中包括14个欧盟国家、挪威、英国、瑞士和土耳其。根据我们对DST的定义,总共确定了115个DSTs,其中农艺师、顾问和农民是主要用户。DSTs的采用率被评为中等(得分:3.1/5),具有用户友好界面和与农民目标一致的工具实现了更高的采用率。与区域目标(得分:3.6/5)或国家目标(得分:3.5/5)相比,DSTs被评为更适合实现农场一级目标(得分:4.1/5)。采用DST的主要障碍包括终端用户对DST开发的参与有限,这可能会阻碍与实际需求的一致。在收到的所有问卷中,最常被提及的改进领域是养分利用效率(45%),SOM(24%)和保水率(18%)。答复者强调需要更好地整合新的农业系统(如有机农业、农林业),更详细地描述过程,整合多种过程,包括经济模块和改进用户界面。本研究首次对欧洲的DSTs进行了全面评估,揭示了多样化但适度采用的景观。增加用户参与、加强技术整合和改善可及性对于促进更广泛地使用可持续发展sts以改善土壤健康至关重要。通过采纳这些建议,可持续发展sts可以在实现欧盟的可持续发展目标、培育有弹性的农业系统以及应对土壤退化和气候变化等环境挑战方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Agricultural Decision Support Tools in Europe: What Kind of Tools Are Needed to Foster Soil Health?

Agricultural Decision Support Tools in Europe: What Kind of Tools Are Needed to Foster Soil Health?

Decision support tools (DSTs) are crucial in aiding agricultural decision-making, particularly in improving soil health by enhancing nutrient management, soil organic matter (SOM) and water retention. Despite the availability of numerous DSTs in Europe, their adoption, effectiveness and development needs are not well understood, as most research is based on literature reviews rather than direct feedback from stakeholders. This study aims at filling this gap by conducting an expert survey of the most widely used digital DSTs across Europe on SOM, water retention and nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. We aimed at evaluating the current use, limitations and development needs of DSTs and offering recommendations to improve the effectiveness and adoption of DSTs in the context of soil health. A questionnaire was distributed to experts in 24 countries. Answers were received from 18 countries, including 14 European Union (EU) nations, Norway, the UK, Switzerland and Turkey. A total of 115 DSTs were identified aligning with our definition of DST, with agronomists, consultants and farmers being the primary users. Adoption of DSTs was rated moderate (score: 3.1/5), with tools featuring user-friendly interfaces and alignment with farmer goals achieving higher adoption rates. DSTs were rated better suited to achieve farm-level goals (score: 4.1/5) than regional (score: 3.6/5) or national objectives (score: 3.5/5). Major barriers to adoption included limited end-user involvement in DST development, which may hinder alignment with practical needs. Considering all the received questionnaires, the most frequently cited areas for improvement were nutrient use efficiency (45%), SOM (24%) and water retention (18%). Respondents emphasised the need for better integration of new farming systems (e.g., organic farming, agroforestry), more detailed process descriptions, integration of multiple processes, inclusion of economic modules and improved user interfaces. This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of DSTs in Europe, revealing a diverse yet moderately adopted landscape. Increasing user engagement, enhancing technical integration and improving accessibility are essential for promoting a wider use of DSTs to improve soil health. By adopting these recommendations, DSTs can play a key role in achieving the EU's sustainability goals, fostering resilient agricultural systems and addressing environmental challenges such as soil degradation and climate change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信