Eun Rim Baek, Daniel Alexander Pohoryles, Dionysios A. Bournas
{"title":"预制TRC面板与TRM护套集成地震和能源改造:三个砌体混凝土建筑的双向振动台试验","authors":"Eun Rim Baek, Daniel Alexander Pohoryles, Dionysios A. Bournas","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two novel integrated seismic and energy retrofitting solutions for existing buildings are experimentally assessed in this study. Three 60%-scaled, two-storey infilled reinforced concrete buildings underwent a series of bi-directional shaking table tests. The control building represented a part of a typical Korean school building with seismic design deficiencies and suffered out-of-plane (OOP) failure of the second-storey infill panels at maximum considered earthquake. Two retrofitting schemes based on textile-reinforced cement-based composites were evaluated as follows: (1) newly developed ‘textile capillary-tube panels’ (TCPs), namely pre-fabricated textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) with integrated capillary tubes, and (2) a combination of textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) with thermal insulation. Additionally, the presence of openings in the infills, as well as the effect of different types of anchorage of the textile reinforcement were studied. At the design level earthquake, both retrofitted buildings presented next to no damage, compared to the control structure that was in a state of near-collapse. The retrofitted structures reached double the intensity of the design earthquake, with the shaking table reaching its maximum acceleration capacity, yet no irreversible damage was observed. The strength increase for both retrofitted buildings was +110% compared to the un-retrofitted building in the direction with openings, in which both buildings were retrofitted with TRM. For the fully infilled direction, the TRM-retrofitted building recorded more than double the inter-storey drifts compared to the TCP-retrofit, and reached its peak strength (+120% compared to the control building). The TCP-retrofitted building, instead, displayed a stiffer response with reduced deformations due to the carbon textiles employed in the precast panels. For both retrofits OOP damage was prevented, also demonstrated by the measured accelerations at the centre of the infills.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 6","pages":"1617-1641"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4327","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-fabricated TRC Panels Versus TRM Jacketing for Integrating Seismic and Energy Retrofitting: Bi-Directional Shaking Table Tests on Three Masonry-Infilled RC Buildings\",\"authors\":\"Eun Rim Baek, Daniel Alexander Pohoryles, Dionysios A. Bournas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eqe.4327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two novel integrated seismic and energy retrofitting solutions for existing buildings are experimentally assessed in this study. Three 60%-scaled, two-storey infilled reinforced concrete buildings underwent a series of bi-directional shaking table tests. The control building represented a part of a typical Korean school building with seismic design deficiencies and suffered out-of-plane (OOP) failure of the second-storey infill panels at maximum considered earthquake. Two retrofitting schemes based on textile-reinforced cement-based composites were evaluated as follows: (1) newly developed ‘textile capillary-tube panels’ (TCPs), namely pre-fabricated textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) with integrated capillary tubes, and (2) a combination of textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) with thermal insulation. Additionally, the presence of openings in the infills, as well as the effect of different types of anchorage of the textile reinforcement were studied. At the design level earthquake, both retrofitted buildings presented next to no damage, compared to the control structure that was in a state of near-collapse. The retrofitted structures reached double the intensity of the design earthquake, with the shaking table reaching its maximum acceleration capacity, yet no irreversible damage was observed. The strength increase for both retrofitted buildings was +110% compared to the un-retrofitted building in the direction with openings, in which both buildings were retrofitted with TRM. For the fully infilled direction, the TRM-retrofitted building recorded more than double the inter-storey drifts compared to the TCP-retrofit, and reached its peak strength (+120% compared to the control building). The TCP-retrofitted building, instead, displayed a stiffer response with reduced deformations due to the carbon textiles employed in the precast panels. For both retrofits OOP damage was prevented, also demonstrated by the measured accelerations at the centre of the infills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"1617-1641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eqe.4327\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4327\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pre-fabricated TRC Panels Versus TRM Jacketing for Integrating Seismic and Energy Retrofitting: Bi-Directional Shaking Table Tests on Three Masonry-Infilled RC Buildings
Two novel integrated seismic and energy retrofitting solutions for existing buildings are experimentally assessed in this study. Three 60%-scaled, two-storey infilled reinforced concrete buildings underwent a series of bi-directional shaking table tests. The control building represented a part of a typical Korean school building with seismic design deficiencies and suffered out-of-plane (OOP) failure of the second-storey infill panels at maximum considered earthquake. Two retrofitting schemes based on textile-reinforced cement-based composites were evaluated as follows: (1) newly developed ‘textile capillary-tube panels’ (TCPs), namely pre-fabricated textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) with integrated capillary tubes, and (2) a combination of textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) with thermal insulation. Additionally, the presence of openings in the infills, as well as the effect of different types of anchorage of the textile reinforcement were studied. At the design level earthquake, both retrofitted buildings presented next to no damage, compared to the control structure that was in a state of near-collapse. The retrofitted structures reached double the intensity of the design earthquake, with the shaking table reaching its maximum acceleration capacity, yet no irreversible damage was observed. The strength increase for both retrofitted buildings was +110% compared to the un-retrofitted building in the direction with openings, in which both buildings were retrofitted with TRM. For the fully infilled direction, the TRM-retrofitted building recorded more than double the inter-storey drifts compared to the TCP-retrofit, and reached its peak strength (+120% compared to the control building). The TCP-retrofitted building, instead, displayed a stiffer response with reduced deformations due to the carbon textiles employed in the precast panels. For both retrofits OOP damage was prevented, also demonstrated by the measured accelerations at the centre of the infills.
期刊介绍:
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following:
ground motions for analysis and design
geotechnical earthquake engineering
probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis
experimental behaviour of structures
seismic protective systems
system identification
risk assessment
seismic code requirements
methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.