Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago , Alyssa Sawyer , Joanne Hedges , Michael Sawyer , Lisa Jamieson
{"title":"澳大利亚土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民与非土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民之间育儿能力感量表的网络跨文化验证","authors":"Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago , Alyssa Sawyer , Joanne Hedges , Michael Sawyer , Lisa Jamieson","doi":"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) is the most used instrument worldwide to measure parenting sense of competence. Considering that cultural differences influence parenting practices, an investigation of cross-cultural validity was required to ensure that PSOC scores can be compared between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. To address this research gap, this study employed network psychometrics to investigate the cross-cultural validity of the PSOC between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study investigated the network psychometric properties of the PSOC instrument, specifically: (1) model estimation; (2) item redundancy; (3) dimensionality; (4) measurement invariance; (5) model fit; (6) criterion validity; and (7) reliability. The network model that was used was the Gaussian graphical model estimated with the graphical least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Dimensionality was evaluated with exploratory graph analysis. Measurement invariance was evaluated via permutation testing. Data were from the South Australian Aboriginal Birth Cohort (n=178) and eMums study (n=107).</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>The findings indicated that, after accounting for item redundancy, a revised 14-item version of the PSOC displayed the two theoretical dimensions of Efficacy and Satisfaction and was cross-culturally valid among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>The revised 14-item PSOC displayed excellent psychometric properties and is readily available to be used in Australia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100532,"journal":{"name":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100058"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A network cross-cultural validation of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago , Alyssa Sawyer , Joanne Hedges , Michael Sawyer , Lisa Jamieson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fnhli.2025.100058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) is the most used instrument worldwide to measure parenting sense of competence. Considering that cultural differences influence parenting practices, an investigation of cross-cultural validity was required to ensure that PSOC scores can be compared between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. To address this research gap, this study employed network psychometrics to investigate the cross-cultural validity of the PSOC between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study investigated the network psychometric properties of the PSOC instrument, specifically: (1) model estimation; (2) item redundancy; (3) dimensionality; (4) measurement invariance; (5) model fit; (6) criterion validity; and (7) reliability. The network model that was used was the Gaussian graphical model estimated with the graphical least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Dimensionality was evaluated with exploratory graph analysis. Measurement invariance was evaluated via permutation testing. Data were from the South Australian Aboriginal Birth Cohort (n=178) and eMums study (n=107).</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>The findings indicated that, after accounting for item redundancy, a revised 14-item version of the PSOC displayed the two theoretical dimensions of Efficacy and Satisfaction and was cross-culturally valid among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians.</div></div><div><h3>Principal conclusions</h3><div>The revised 14-item PSOC displayed excellent psychometric properties and is readily available to be used in Australia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949840625000166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Nations Health and Wellbeing - The Lowitja Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949840625000166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A network cross-cultural validation of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians
Purpose
The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) is the most used instrument worldwide to measure parenting sense of competence. Considering that cultural differences influence parenting practices, an investigation of cross-cultural validity was required to ensure that PSOC scores can be compared between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. To address this research gap, this study employed network psychometrics to investigate the cross-cultural validity of the PSOC between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.
Methods
The study investigated the network psychometric properties of the PSOC instrument, specifically: (1) model estimation; (2) item redundancy; (3) dimensionality; (4) measurement invariance; (5) model fit; (6) criterion validity; and (7) reliability. The network model that was used was the Gaussian graphical model estimated with the graphical least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Dimensionality was evaluated with exploratory graph analysis. Measurement invariance was evaluated via permutation testing. Data were from the South Australian Aboriginal Birth Cohort (n=178) and eMums study (n=107).
Main findings
The findings indicated that, after accounting for item redundancy, a revised 14-item version of the PSOC displayed the two theoretical dimensions of Efficacy and Satisfaction and was cross-culturally valid among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians.
Principal conclusions
The revised 14-item PSOC displayed excellent psychometric properties and is readily available to be used in Australia.