地方利益相关者对经济活动发展的看法:Gällivare案例

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jerbelle Elomina , Ivana Živojinović , Gun Lidestav , Per Sandström , Stefan Sandström , Helga Pülzl
{"title":"地方利益相关者对经济活动发展的看法:Gällivare案例","authors":"Jerbelle Elomina ,&nbsp;Ivana Živojinović ,&nbsp;Gun Lidestav ,&nbsp;Per Sandström ,&nbsp;Stefan Sandström ,&nbsp;Helga Pülzl","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sweden's commitment to environmental conservation, social equity, and cultural preservation is challenged by intensifying resource extraction and land use conflicts. To ensure its continued equitable development, understanding and incorporating local perspectives into the decision-making process is necessary. Hence, this study seeks to understand current stakeholder views on the development of extractive industries i.e., mining and forestry; and traditional livelihood focusing on reindeer husbandry as defined by the human development theory and subjective capabilities. We used Gällivare, Sweden as our case study where all these economic activities are present and land use conflicts are intensifying. Through expert interviews and local stakeholder surveys using Q-methodology, we identified three perspectives: (1) Uncertain Development, (2) Prioritizing Nature and Reindeer, and (3) Industry Growth Equals Community Growth. We also found points of consensus and conflicts among these differing perspectives crucial for improving ongoing discussions and negotiations on land use conflicts. What remains clear is that development remains contested. Some groups express limited capabilities and freedom in pursuing the life they value hence development for some stakeholders is still far from reality as against reported indexes. Finally, we suggest that examining local stakeholder views on development can enhance the current monitoring of human development, especially in the Arctic region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local stakeholder's perspectives on development of economic activities: The Gällivare case\",\"authors\":\"Jerbelle Elomina ,&nbsp;Ivana Živojinović ,&nbsp;Gun Lidestav ,&nbsp;Per Sandström ,&nbsp;Stefan Sandström ,&nbsp;Helga Pülzl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sweden's commitment to environmental conservation, social equity, and cultural preservation is challenged by intensifying resource extraction and land use conflicts. To ensure its continued equitable development, understanding and incorporating local perspectives into the decision-making process is necessary. Hence, this study seeks to understand current stakeholder views on the development of extractive industries i.e., mining and forestry; and traditional livelihood focusing on reindeer husbandry as defined by the human development theory and subjective capabilities. We used Gällivare, Sweden as our case study where all these economic activities are present and land use conflicts are intensifying. Through expert interviews and local stakeholder surveys using Q-methodology, we identified three perspectives: (1) Uncertain Development, (2) Prioritizing Nature and Reindeer, and (3) Industry Growth Equals Community Growth. We also found points of consensus and conflicts among these differing perspectives crucial for improving ongoing discussions and negotiations on land use conflicts. What remains clear is that development remains contested. Some groups express limited capabilities and freedom in pursuing the life they value hence development for some stakeholders is still far from reality as against reported indexes. Finally, we suggest that examining local stakeholder views on development can enhance the current monitoring of human development, especially in the Arctic region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X2500053X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X2500053X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

瑞典对环境保护、社会公平和文化保护的承诺受到日益加剧的资源开采和土地使用冲突的挑战。为了确保其继续公平发展,必须了解并将当地观点纳入决策过程。因此,本研究旨在了解当前利益相关者对采掘业(即采矿业和林业)发展的看法;而传统的生计则以人类发展理论和主观能力所定义的驯鹿饲养为主。我们以瑞典Gällivare作为案例研究,所有这些经济活动都存在,土地使用冲突正在加剧。通过专家访谈和使用q -方法论的当地利益相关者调查,我们确定了三个观点:(1)不确定的发展;(2)优先考虑自然和驯鹿;(3)行业增长等于社区增长。我们还发现,这些不同观点之间的共识和冲突点对于改善正在进行的关于土地使用冲突的讨论和谈判至关重要。仍然清楚的是,发展仍然存在争议。一些群体表示,在追求他们所重视的生活方面,能力和自由有限,因此,与报告的指标相比,一些利益相关者的发展仍远未实现。最后,我们建议审查当地利益相关者对发展的看法可以加强目前对人类发展的监测,特别是在北极地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local stakeholder's perspectives on development of economic activities: The Gällivare case
Sweden's commitment to environmental conservation, social equity, and cultural preservation is challenged by intensifying resource extraction and land use conflicts. To ensure its continued equitable development, understanding and incorporating local perspectives into the decision-making process is necessary. Hence, this study seeks to understand current stakeholder views on the development of extractive industries i.e., mining and forestry; and traditional livelihood focusing on reindeer husbandry as defined by the human development theory and subjective capabilities. We used Gällivare, Sweden as our case study where all these economic activities are present and land use conflicts are intensifying. Through expert interviews and local stakeholder surveys using Q-methodology, we identified three perspectives: (1) Uncertain Development, (2) Prioritizing Nature and Reindeer, and (3) Industry Growth Equals Community Growth. We also found points of consensus and conflicts among these differing perspectives crucial for improving ongoing discussions and negotiations on land use conflicts. What remains clear is that development remains contested. Some groups express limited capabilities and freedom in pursuing the life they value hence development for some stakeholders is still far from reality as against reported indexes. Finally, we suggest that examining local stakeholder views on development can enhance the current monitoring of human development, especially in the Arctic region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信