基于机器学习的乔里斯坦牛红细胞检测与定量:试点研究

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Sami Ul Rehman , Sania Fayyaz , Muhammad Usman , Mehreen Saleem , Umer Farooq , Asjad Amin , Mushtaq Hussain Lashari , Musadiq Idris , Haroon Rashid , Maryam Chaudhary
{"title":"基于机器学习的乔里斯坦牛红细胞检测与定量:试点研究","authors":"Sami Ul Rehman ,&nbsp;Sania Fayyaz ,&nbsp;Muhammad Usman ,&nbsp;Mehreen Saleem ,&nbsp;Umer Farooq ,&nbsp;Asjad Amin ,&nbsp;Mushtaq Hussain Lashari ,&nbsp;Musadiq Idris ,&nbsp;Haroon Rashid ,&nbsp;Maryam Chaudhary","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents the first account of using machine learning to detect and count normal and abnormal red blood cells (RBCs), including tear-drop cells and schistocytes, in Cholistani cattle from Pakistan. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) model was applied and compared with manual counting methods. Pre-annotated blood smear images were preprocessed using contrast stretching transformation, followed by segmentation and resizing. Labeled datasets were augmented, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed for feature reduction. The dataset was randomly split into training (80 %) and testing (20 %) subsets, and the SVM model was trained and evaluated accordingly. No statistically significant difference (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.05) was observed between manual and machine learning-based RBC counts for all the studied cell types. The highest classification probability was recorded for normal RBCs (87 %), followed by tear-drop cells (84 %) and schistocytes (73 %). Accuracy was highest for tear-drop cells (0.991), followed by normal RBCs (0.965) and schistocytes (0.707). Precision values followed a similar trend, with the highest for normal RBCs (0.932), followed by tear-drop cells (0.921) and schistocytes (0.855). These findings suggest that machine learning, particularly SVM-based models, can accurately and precisely detect and count normal RBCs and tear-drop cells in Cholistani cattle. However, further refinements are needed to improve RBC detection using convolution neural networks or other deep learning approaches. This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence for hematological assessments in veterinary medicine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 105650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based detection and quantification of red blood cells in Cholistani cattle: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Sami Ul Rehman ,&nbsp;Sania Fayyaz ,&nbsp;Muhammad Usman ,&nbsp;Mehreen Saleem ,&nbsp;Umer Farooq ,&nbsp;Asjad Amin ,&nbsp;Mushtaq Hussain Lashari ,&nbsp;Musadiq Idris ,&nbsp;Haroon Rashid ,&nbsp;Maryam Chaudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents the first account of using machine learning to detect and count normal and abnormal red blood cells (RBCs), including tear-drop cells and schistocytes, in Cholistani cattle from Pakistan. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) model was applied and compared with manual counting methods. Pre-annotated blood smear images were preprocessed using contrast stretching transformation, followed by segmentation and resizing. Labeled datasets were augmented, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed for feature reduction. The dataset was randomly split into training (80 %) and testing (20 %) subsets, and the SVM model was trained and evaluated accordingly. No statistically significant difference (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.05) was observed between manual and machine learning-based RBC counts for all the studied cell types. The highest classification probability was recorded for normal RBCs (87 %), followed by tear-drop cells (84 %) and schistocytes (73 %). Accuracy was highest for tear-drop cells (0.991), followed by normal RBCs (0.965) and schistocytes (0.707). Precision values followed a similar trend, with the highest for normal RBCs (0.932), followed by tear-drop cells (0.921) and schistocytes (0.855). These findings suggest that machine learning, particularly SVM-based models, can accurately and precisely detect and count normal RBCs and tear-drop cells in Cholistani cattle. However, further refinements are needed to improve RBC detection using convolution neural networks or other deep learning approaches. This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence for hematological assessments in veterinary medicine.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825001249\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825001249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究首次介绍了使用机器学习检测和计数巴基斯坦Cholistani牛的正常和异常红细胞(rbc),包括泪滴细胞和血吸虫细胞。采用支持向量机(SVM)模型,并与人工计数方法进行比较。使用对比度拉伸变换对预注释的血液涂片图像进行预处理,然后进行分割和调整大小。对标记的数据集进行扩充,并采用主成分分析(PCA)进行特征约简。将数据集随机分为训练子集(80%)和测试子集(20%),对SVM模型进行相应的训练和评估。在所有研究的细胞类型中,人工和机器学习的RBC计数无统计学差异(P≥0.05)。正常红细胞的分类概率最高(87%),其次是泪滴细胞(84%)和血吸虫细胞(73%)。泪滴细胞准确率最高(0.991),正常红细胞次之(0.965),裂细胞次之(0.707)。精度值也有类似的趋势,正常红细胞最高(0.932),其次是泪滴细胞(0.921)和血吸虫细胞(0.855)。这些发现表明,机器学习,特别是基于支持向量机的模型,可以准确准确地检测和计数正常红细胞和Cholistani牛的泪滴细胞。然而,需要使用卷积神经网络或其他深度学习方法进一步改进RBC检测。这项研究强调了人工智能在兽医学血液学评估中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning-based detection and quantification of red blood cells in Cholistani cattle: A pilot study
This study presents the first account of using machine learning to detect and count normal and abnormal red blood cells (RBCs), including tear-drop cells and schistocytes, in Cholistani cattle from Pakistan. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) model was applied and compared with manual counting methods. Pre-annotated blood smear images were preprocessed using contrast stretching transformation, followed by segmentation and resizing. Labeled datasets were augmented, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed for feature reduction. The dataset was randomly split into training (80 %) and testing (20 %) subsets, and the SVM model was trained and evaluated accordingly. No statistically significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) was observed between manual and machine learning-based RBC counts for all the studied cell types. The highest classification probability was recorded for normal RBCs (87 %), followed by tear-drop cells (84 %) and schistocytes (73 %). Accuracy was highest for tear-drop cells (0.991), followed by normal RBCs (0.965) and schistocytes (0.707). Precision values followed a similar trend, with the highest for normal RBCs (0.932), followed by tear-drop cells (0.921) and schistocytes (0.855). These findings suggest that machine learning, particularly SVM-based models, can accurately and precisely detect and count normal RBCs and tear-drop cells in Cholistani cattle. However, further refinements are needed to improve RBC detection using convolution neural networks or other deep learning approaches. This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence for hematological assessments in veterinary medicine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信