评估小水电资源和项目可行性的计算机工具:综述

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Petras Punys
{"title":"评估小水电资源和项目可行性的计算机工具:综述","authors":"Petras Punys","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article analyses and compares computer-based tools designed for small hydropower (SHP) potential assessment, site planning, and design, focusing on the initial assessment phase of project evaluation. The review draws from various sources, including open-access publications, research papers and projects, data repositories, and web resources. This paper presents more than 40 software tools currently in use, their main features, comparative analysis, and research studies using them, including a brief reminder of historic software tools. These tools can provide simple initial estimates or be sophisticated software considering unconventional (in-conduit) hydro. They are categorised into four groups: i) Hydraulic turbine selection (4 software), ii) Site feasibility assessment (18), iii) Environmental flow assessment (5), iv) Web-based hydropower atlases (9), and v) Multicriteria analysis (3).</div><div>The review highlights that while there are numerous tools for site assessment, the development of new tools for turbine selection, particularly for innovative hydro turbines, has declined. It also notes the increasing adoption of digital platforms and web-based mapping for hydropower, driven by advancements in GIS, which aid in identifying feasible hydro sites. Special tools for applying multicriteria analysis to evaluate conflicting and other aspects of hydropower development are also discussed. The paper emphasises the importance of user feedback in improving these tools. It critically reviews the available tools, summarises best practices, and provides guidelines for their further application and enhancement in hydropower resource assessment and project site feasibility evaluation. This review aims to assist SHP designers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable software.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 115717"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer-based tools for assessment of small-scale hydropower resources and project feasibility: a review\",\"authors\":\"Petras Punys\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article analyses and compares computer-based tools designed for small hydropower (SHP) potential assessment, site planning, and design, focusing on the initial assessment phase of project evaluation. The review draws from various sources, including open-access publications, research papers and projects, data repositories, and web resources. This paper presents more than 40 software tools currently in use, their main features, comparative analysis, and research studies using them, including a brief reminder of historic software tools. These tools can provide simple initial estimates or be sophisticated software considering unconventional (in-conduit) hydro. They are categorised into four groups: i) Hydraulic turbine selection (4 software), ii) Site feasibility assessment (18), iii) Environmental flow assessment (5), iv) Web-based hydropower atlases (9), and v) Multicriteria analysis (3).</div><div>The review highlights that while there are numerous tools for site assessment, the development of new tools for turbine selection, particularly for innovative hydro turbines, has declined. It also notes the increasing adoption of digital platforms and web-based mapping for hydropower, driven by advancements in GIS, which aid in identifying feasible hydro sites. Special tools for applying multicriteria analysis to evaluate conflicting and other aspects of hydropower development are also discussed. The paper emphasises the importance of user feedback in improving these tools. It critically reviews the available tools, summarises best practices, and provides guidelines for their further application and enhancement in hydropower resource assessment and project site feasibility evaluation. This review aims to assist SHP designers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable software.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003909\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125003909","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computer-based tools for assessment of small-scale hydropower resources and project feasibility: a review
This article analyses and compares computer-based tools designed for small hydropower (SHP) potential assessment, site planning, and design, focusing on the initial assessment phase of project evaluation. The review draws from various sources, including open-access publications, research papers and projects, data repositories, and web resources. This paper presents more than 40 software tools currently in use, their main features, comparative analysis, and research studies using them, including a brief reminder of historic software tools. These tools can provide simple initial estimates or be sophisticated software considering unconventional (in-conduit) hydro. They are categorised into four groups: i) Hydraulic turbine selection (4 software), ii) Site feasibility assessment (18), iii) Environmental flow assessment (5), iv) Web-based hydropower atlases (9), and v) Multicriteria analysis (3).
The review highlights that while there are numerous tools for site assessment, the development of new tools for turbine selection, particularly for innovative hydro turbines, has declined. It also notes the increasing adoption of digital platforms and web-based mapping for hydropower, driven by advancements in GIS, which aid in identifying feasible hydro sites. Special tools for applying multicriteria analysis to evaluate conflicting and other aspects of hydropower development are also discussed. The paper emphasises the importance of user feedback in improving these tools. It critically reviews the available tools, summarises best practices, and provides guidelines for their further application and enhancement in hydropower resource assessment and project site feasibility evaluation. This review aims to assist SHP designers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable software.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信