讲普通话的儿童对加点词 "也 "的习得

IF 1.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Haiquan Huang , Yixiong Chen , Xuewu Qin , Xin Wang , Jie Xu
{"title":"讲普通话的儿童对加点词 \"也 \"的习得","authors":"Haiquan Huang ,&nbsp;Yixiong Chen ,&nbsp;Xuewu Qin ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Jie Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2025.103936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies have reported conflicting findings on children’s interpretation of additive particles. One of the previous studies has reported that Mandarin-speaking children up to 7 have difficulty deriving the presupposition triggered by the additive particle <em>ye</em> ‘also’. By contrast, another body of research has found that 3-to-4-year-olds can correctly interpret additive particles across languages. Such conflicting findings might have resulted from the different research techniques. Moreover, no study has been conducted to probe whether children are able to identify subject- versus object-associated focus in sentences with an additive particle. Against this backdrop, the current study attempts to systematically re-evaluate how Mandarin-speaking children interpret sentences with <em>ye</em> ‘also’, using an adapted research method. Two experiments were conducted with 3-to-4-year-olds and a group of adult controls. Experiment 1 probed whether children were able to identify object-associated focus in sentences with <em>ye</em>. Experiment 2 evaluated whether another group of children were able to identify subject-associated focus in sentences with <em>ye</em>. It was found that 3-year-olds already performed quite well and 4-year-olds nearly had adult-like performance in both experiments. The findings indicate that Mandarin-speaking preschoolers are able to identify subject- versus object-associated focus in sentences with <em>ye</em>, and such a linguistic ability develops in an incremental fashion. We discuss the methodological and theoretical implications of the findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 103936"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandarin-speaking children’s acquisition of the additive particle ye ‘also’\",\"authors\":\"Haiquan Huang ,&nbsp;Yixiong Chen ,&nbsp;Xuewu Qin ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Jie Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lingua.2025.103936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous studies have reported conflicting findings on children’s interpretation of additive particles. One of the previous studies has reported that Mandarin-speaking children up to 7 have difficulty deriving the presupposition triggered by the additive particle <em>ye</em> ‘also’. By contrast, another body of research has found that 3-to-4-year-olds can correctly interpret additive particles across languages. Such conflicting findings might have resulted from the different research techniques. Moreover, no study has been conducted to probe whether children are able to identify subject- versus object-associated focus in sentences with an additive particle. Against this backdrop, the current study attempts to systematically re-evaluate how Mandarin-speaking children interpret sentences with <em>ye</em> ‘also’, using an adapted research method. Two experiments were conducted with 3-to-4-year-olds and a group of adult controls. Experiment 1 probed whether children were able to identify object-associated focus in sentences with <em>ye</em>. Experiment 2 evaluated whether another group of children were able to identify subject-associated focus in sentences with <em>ye</em>. It was found that 3-year-olds already performed quite well and 4-year-olds nearly had adult-like performance in both experiments. The findings indicate that Mandarin-speaking preschoolers are able to identify subject- versus object-associated focus in sentences with <em>ye</em>, and such a linguistic ability develops in an incremental fashion. We discuss the methodological and theoretical implications of the findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lingua\",\"volume\":\"320 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lingua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384125000610\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384125000610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究报告对儿童解释加点词的结果相互矛盾。其中一项研究报告指出,7 岁以下讲普通话的儿童很难推导出加点词 ye "也 "所引发的预设。与此相反,另一项研究发现,3 到 4 岁的儿童可以正确解释不同语言的加法语气词。这种相互矛盾的研究结果可能是由不同的研究技术造成的。此外,还没有研究探究过儿童是否能够识别句子中带有加点的主语和宾语相关的重点。在此背景下,本研究试图采用一种经过调整的研究方法,系统地重新评估讲普通话的儿童如何解释带有ye "也 "的句子。本研究以 3-4 岁儿童和一组成人对照组为对象,进行了两项实验。实验 1 探讨了儿童是否能够识别带有 ye 的句子中与对象相关的重点。实验 2 则评估了另一组儿童是否能够识别带 ye 的句子中与主语相关的重点。结果发现,在这两项实验中,3 岁儿童的表现已经相当不错,而 4 岁儿童的表现几乎与成人相当。研究结果表明,说普通话的学龄前儿童能够识别带ye的句子中与主语或宾语相关的重点,而且这种语言能力是以渐进的方式发展起来的。我们讨论了研究结果的方法论和理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mandarin-speaking children’s acquisition of the additive particle ye ‘also’
Previous studies have reported conflicting findings on children’s interpretation of additive particles. One of the previous studies has reported that Mandarin-speaking children up to 7 have difficulty deriving the presupposition triggered by the additive particle ye ‘also’. By contrast, another body of research has found that 3-to-4-year-olds can correctly interpret additive particles across languages. Such conflicting findings might have resulted from the different research techniques. Moreover, no study has been conducted to probe whether children are able to identify subject- versus object-associated focus in sentences with an additive particle. Against this backdrop, the current study attempts to systematically re-evaluate how Mandarin-speaking children interpret sentences with ye ‘also’, using an adapted research method. Two experiments were conducted with 3-to-4-year-olds and a group of adult controls. Experiment 1 probed whether children were able to identify object-associated focus in sentences with ye. Experiment 2 evaluated whether another group of children were able to identify subject-associated focus in sentences with ye. It was found that 3-year-olds already performed quite well and 4-year-olds nearly had adult-like performance in both experiments. The findings indicate that Mandarin-speaking preschoolers are able to identify subject- versus object-associated focus in sentences with ye, and such a linguistic ability develops in an incremental fashion. We discuss the methodological and theoretical implications of the findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lingua
Lingua Multiple-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信