美国市场低迷和尾部风险传导速度不对称:评估新冠肺炎大流行期间和之后的宏观经济政策有效性

IF 3.1 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Zinan Hu, Sumuya Borjigin
{"title":"美国市场低迷和尾部风险传导速度不对称:评估新冠肺炎大流行期间和之后的宏观经济政策有效性","authors":"Zinan Hu,&nbsp;Sumuya Borjigin","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2025.101993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how US market downturns affect the asymmetry in tail risk information transmission speed. It also evaluates how monetary and fiscal policies help mitigate this asymmetry during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Using model-free measures of bad (disaster risk) and good (swift recovery) tail risk derived from daily options data, we obtain forward-looking tail risk information. Based on the TENET model, we construct daily networks for bad and good tail risk spillovers. Empirical results show that market downturns increase the asymmetry in bad and good tail risk transmission speed. Rising market illiquidity in downturns causes negative tail risk information to transmit faster than positive signals, amplifying the asymmetry. Although fiscal and monetary policies show average mitigation effects across the sample, event analysis shows they consistently reduce this asymmetry during the early COVID-19 phase. This suggests that unconventional macroeconomic interventions during extreme downturns more effectively mitigate asymmetric information transmission.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 101993"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Market Downturns and Asymmetric Tail Risk Transmission Speed in the US: Evaluating Macroeconomic Policy Effectiveness during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Zinan Hu,&nbsp;Sumuya Borjigin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.qref.2025.101993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines how US market downturns affect the asymmetry in tail risk information transmission speed. It also evaluates how monetary and fiscal policies help mitigate this asymmetry during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Using model-free measures of bad (disaster risk) and good (swift recovery) tail risk derived from daily options data, we obtain forward-looking tail risk information. Based on the TENET model, we construct daily networks for bad and good tail risk spillovers. Empirical results show that market downturns increase the asymmetry in bad and good tail risk transmission speed. Rising market illiquidity in downturns causes negative tail risk information to transmit faster than positive signals, amplifying the asymmetry. Although fiscal and monetary policies show average mitigation effects across the sample, event analysis shows they consistently reduce this asymmetry during the early COVID-19 phase. This suggests that unconventional macroeconomic interventions during extreme downturns more effectively mitigate asymmetric information transmission.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101993\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976925000341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976925000341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨美国市场低迷如何影响尾部风险信息传递速度的不对称性。它还评估了货币和财政政策如何在COVID-19大流行期间和之后帮助缓解这种不对称。利用每日期权数据衍生的坏(灾难风险)和好(快速恢复)尾部风险的无模型度量,我们获得前瞻性尾部风险信息。基于TENET模型,我们构建了坏尾风险溢出和好尾风险溢出的日常网络。实证结果表明,市场低迷增加了不良尾部风险和良好尾部风险传导速度的不对称性。低迷时期市场流动性不足加剧,导致负面尾部风险信息的传播速度快于正面信号,放大了不对称。尽管财政和货币政策在整个样本中显示出平均的缓解效果,但事件分析表明,它们在COVID-19早期阶段持续降低了这种不对称性。这表明,在极端经济低迷时期,非常规宏观经济干预更有效地缓解了信息传递的不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Market Downturns and Asymmetric Tail Risk Transmission Speed in the US: Evaluating Macroeconomic Policy Effectiveness during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic
This study examines how US market downturns affect the asymmetry in tail risk information transmission speed. It also evaluates how monetary and fiscal policies help mitigate this asymmetry during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Using model-free measures of bad (disaster risk) and good (swift recovery) tail risk derived from daily options data, we obtain forward-looking tail risk information. Based on the TENET model, we construct daily networks for bad and good tail risk spillovers. Empirical results show that market downturns increase the asymmetry in bad and good tail risk transmission speed. Rising market illiquidity in downturns causes negative tail risk information to transmit faster than positive signals, amplifying the asymmetry. Although fiscal and monetary policies show average mitigation effects across the sample, event analysis shows they consistently reduce this asymmetry during the early COVID-19 phase. This suggests that unconventional macroeconomic interventions during extreme downturns more effectively mitigate asymmetric information transmission.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信