扩大生产者责任的潜在有效性:在比利时,法国和德国塑料包装废弃物的事前政策影响分析

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jakob T. Pruess , Rachael D. Garrett
{"title":"扩大生产者责任的潜在有效性:在比利时,法国和德国塑料包装废弃物的事前政策影响分析","authors":"Jakob T. Pruess ,&nbsp;Rachael D. Garrett","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a key policy principle to mitigate adverse effects of plastic pollution, holding producers accountable for their products' end-of-life management. Yet, assessment of EPR effectiveness is limited by data quality and causal research design for post-hoc analysis, especially with regard to analyzing country contexts. To grasp EPR's true impact, it is crucial to consider its broader regulatory, socio-economic, and value chain contexts. We introduce a refined ex-ante framework for evaluating potential effectiveness of EPR based on scope, design, and context. To test this approach, we apply the framework to Belgium, France, and Germany and find that all three show high effectiveness, albeit Germany ranks highest. Germany is strong in technology, recycling options and routes, but lacks transparency. Belgium and France grant municipalities greater influence yet face impending cost escalations. Our findings also underscore the need for EU-wide harmonization of several EPR design and implementation criteria.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108297"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential effectiveness of extended producer responsibility: An ex-ante policy impact analysis for plastic packaging waste in Belgium, France, and Germany\",\"authors\":\"Jakob T. Pruess ,&nbsp;Rachael D. Garrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a key policy principle to mitigate adverse effects of plastic pollution, holding producers accountable for their products' end-of-life management. Yet, assessment of EPR effectiveness is limited by data quality and causal research design for post-hoc analysis, especially with regard to analyzing country contexts. To grasp EPR's true impact, it is crucial to consider its broader regulatory, socio-economic, and value chain contexts. We introduce a refined ex-ante framework for evaluating potential effectiveness of EPR based on scope, design, and context. To test this approach, we apply the framework to Belgium, France, and Germany and find that all three show high effectiveness, albeit Germany ranks highest. Germany is strong in technology, recycling options and routes, but lacks transparency. Belgium and France grant municipalities greater influence yet face impending cost escalations. Our findings also underscore the need for EU-wide harmonization of several EPR design and implementation criteria.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001764\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925001764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扩大生产者责任(EPR)是减轻塑料污染不利影响的一项关键政策原则,要求生产者对其产品的报废管理负责。然而,对紧急方案评估有效性的评估受到数据质量和事后分析的因果研究设计的限制,特别是在分析国家背景方面。要掌握EPR的真正影响,必须考虑其更广泛的监管、社会经济和价值链背景。我们介绍了一个基于范围、设计和背景的改进的事前框架,用于评估EPR的潜在有效性。为了测试这种方法,我们将该框架应用于比利时、法国和德国,发现这三个国家都表现出很高的有效性,尽管德国排名最高。德国在技术、回收方案和路线方面实力雄厚,但缺乏透明度。比利时和法国给予市政当局更大的影响力,但面临迫在眉睫的成本上涨。我们的研究结果还强调了在欧盟范围内协调几个EPR设计和实施标准的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Potential effectiveness of extended producer responsibility: An ex-ante policy impact analysis for plastic packaging waste in Belgium, France, and Germany

Potential effectiveness of extended producer responsibility: An ex-ante policy impact analysis for plastic packaging waste in Belgium, France, and Germany
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a key policy principle to mitigate adverse effects of plastic pollution, holding producers accountable for their products' end-of-life management. Yet, assessment of EPR effectiveness is limited by data quality and causal research design for post-hoc analysis, especially with regard to analyzing country contexts. To grasp EPR's true impact, it is crucial to consider its broader regulatory, socio-economic, and value chain contexts. We introduce a refined ex-ante framework for evaluating potential effectiveness of EPR based on scope, design, and context. To test this approach, we apply the framework to Belgium, France, and Germany and find that all three show high effectiveness, albeit Germany ranks highest. Germany is strong in technology, recycling options and routes, but lacks transparency. Belgium and France grant municipalities greater influence yet face impending cost escalations. Our findings also underscore the need for EU-wide harmonization of several EPR design and implementation criteria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信