通过生命周期分析评估氢气生产的方法

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yang Chen , Wenshan Guo , Huu Hao Ngo , Zhuo Chen , Chunhai Wei , Xuan Thanh Bui , Tra Van Tung , Huiying Zhang
{"title":"通过生命周期分析评估氢气生产的方法","authors":"Yang Chen ,&nbsp;Wenshan Guo ,&nbsp;Huu Hao Ngo ,&nbsp;Zhuo Chen ,&nbsp;Chunhai Wei ,&nbsp;Xuan Thanh Bui ,&nbsp;Tra Van Tung ,&nbsp;Huiying Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global energy demand increases and reliance on fossil fuels becomes unsustainable, hydrogen presents a promising clean energy alternative due to its high energy density and potential for significant CO<sub>2</sub> emission reductions. However, current hydrogen production methods largely depend on fossil fuels, contributing to considerable CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and underscoring the need to transition to renewable energy sources and improved production technologies. Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is essential for evaluating and optimizing hydrogen production by assessing environmental impacts such as Global Warming Potential (GWP), energy consumption, toxicity, and water usage. The key findings indicate that energy sources and feedstocks heavily influence the environmental impacts of hydrogen production. Hydrogen production from renewable energy sources, particularly wind, solar, and hydropower, demonstrates significantly lower environmental impacts than grid electricity and fossil fuel-based methods. Conversely, hydrogen production from grid electricity primarily derived from fossil fuels shows a high GWP. Furthermore, challenges related to data accuracy, economic analysis integration, and measuring mixed gases are discussed. Future research should focus on improving data accuracy, assessing the impact of technological advancements, and exploring new hydrogen production methods. Harmonizing assessment methodologies across different production pathways and standardizing functional units, such as “1 kg of hydrogen produced, “ are critical for enabling transparent and consistent sustainability evaluations. Techniques such as stochastic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations can improve uncertainty management and enhance the reliability of LCA results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"977 ","pages":"Article 179355"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ways to assess hydrogen production via life cycle analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yang Chen ,&nbsp;Wenshan Guo ,&nbsp;Huu Hao Ngo ,&nbsp;Zhuo Chen ,&nbsp;Chunhai Wei ,&nbsp;Xuan Thanh Bui ,&nbsp;Tra Van Tung ,&nbsp;Huiying Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As global energy demand increases and reliance on fossil fuels becomes unsustainable, hydrogen presents a promising clean energy alternative due to its high energy density and potential for significant CO<sub>2</sub> emission reductions. However, current hydrogen production methods largely depend on fossil fuels, contributing to considerable CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and underscoring the need to transition to renewable energy sources and improved production technologies. Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is essential for evaluating and optimizing hydrogen production by assessing environmental impacts such as Global Warming Potential (GWP), energy consumption, toxicity, and water usage. The key findings indicate that energy sources and feedstocks heavily influence the environmental impacts of hydrogen production. Hydrogen production from renewable energy sources, particularly wind, solar, and hydropower, demonstrates significantly lower environmental impacts than grid electricity and fossil fuel-based methods. Conversely, hydrogen production from grid electricity primarily derived from fossil fuels shows a high GWP. Furthermore, challenges related to data accuracy, economic analysis integration, and measuring mixed gases are discussed. Future research should focus on improving data accuracy, assessing the impact of technological advancements, and exploring new hydrogen production methods. Harmonizing assessment methodologies across different production pathways and standardizing functional units, such as “1 kg of hydrogen produced, “ are critical for enabling transparent and consistent sustainability evaluations. Techniques such as stochastic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations can improve uncertainty management and enhance the reliability of LCA results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\"977 \",\"pages\":\"Article 179355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972500991X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896972500991X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球能源需求的增加和对化石燃料的依赖变得不可持续,氢因其高能量密度和显著减少二氧化碳排放的潜力而成为一种有前途的清洁能源替代品。然而,目前的制氢方法在很大程度上依赖于化石燃料,造成相当大的二氧化碳排放,并强调需要过渡到可再生能源和改进生产技术。生命周期分析(LCA)通过评估环境影响,如全球变暖潜能值(GWP)、能源消耗、毒性和用水量,对于评估和优化氢气生产至关重要。主要研究结果表明,能源来源和原料严重影响制氢对环境的影响。可再生能源制氢,特别是风能、太阳能和水力发电,对环境的影响明显低于电网发电和基于化石燃料的方法。相反,主要来自化石燃料的电网电力产生的氢显示出较高的全球升温潜能值。此外,还讨论了与数据准确性、经济分析集成和测量混合气体相关的挑战。未来的研究应侧重于提高数据准确性,评估技术进步的影响,并探索新的制氢方法。协调不同生产途径的评估方法和标准化功能单位,如“生产1公斤氢气”,对于实现透明和一致的可持续性评估至关重要。随机模型和蒙特卡罗模拟等技术可以改善不确定性管理,提高LCA结果的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ways to assess hydrogen production via life cycle analysis

Ways to assess hydrogen production via life cycle analysis
As global energy demand increases and reliance on fossil fuels becomes unsustainable, hydrogen presents a promising clean energy alternative due to its high energy density and potential for significant CO2 emission reductions. However, current hydrogen production methods largely depend on fossil fuels, contributing to considerable CO2 emissions and underscoring the need to transition to renewable energy sources and improved production technologies. Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is essential for evaluating and optimizing hydrogen production by assessing environmental impacts such as Global Warming Potential (GWP), energy consumption, toxicity, and water usage. The key findings indicate that energy sources and feedstocks heavily influence the environmental impacts of hydrogen production. Hydrogen production from renewable energy sources, particularly wind, solar, and hydropower, demonstrates significantly lower environmental impacts than grid electricity and fossil fuel-based methods. Conversely, hydrogen production from grid electricity primarily derived from fossil fuels shows a high GWP. Furthermore, challenges related to data accuracy, economic analysis integration, and measuring mixed gases are discussed. Future research should focus on improving data accuracy, assessing the impact of technological advancements, and exploring new hydrogen production methods. Harmonizing assessment methodologies across different production pathways and standardizing functional units, such as “1 kg of hydrogen produced, “ are critical for enabling transparent and consistent sustainability evaluations. Techniques such as stochastic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations can improve uncertainty management and enhance the reliability of LCA results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信