{"title":"加固解耦砌体填充墙:循环荷载作用下面外性能试验研究","authors":"Sajad Karimi, Mohammad Reza Mirjalili","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decoupling masonry infill walls has emerged as an effective strategy to mitigate several structural issues associated with traditional interacting infills, including in-plane damage, which can lead to premature out-of-plane failure, and the potential for inducing structural irregularities and short-column effects. However, this decoupling also amplifies out-of-plane bending moments in the infills, rendering them more vulnerable. Various strengthening techniques were investigated in this study to enhance their out-of-plane resistance. 13 pairs of specimens of horizontally perforated clay block infill walls were subjected to cyclic out-of-plane loading to assess strength, displacement, ductility, energy dissipation, and stiffness degradation. The effects of different strengthening techniques, including plastering, improvement of bed joint mortar adhesion, polypropylene (PP) fiber-reinforced plaster, glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh in widespread and strip configurations, welded wire mesh, and galvanized steel chicken wire mesh, were studied. Results indicate that unplastered walls exhibit inadequate out-of-plane resistance, necessitating strengthening measures. Cement-sand plaster significantly improves wall strength, suitable for regions with moderate seismic and wind loads. Welded wire mesh and widespread GFRP mesh emerged as effective strengthening options for high and extreme seismic and wind conditions, while strip GFRP mesh requires cautious application. Although the application of chicken wire mesh can enhance flexural strength, its inherent brittleness, as evidenced by its low ductility and energy dissipation capacity, renders it unsuitable for regions susceptible to moderate to high seismic activity. The use of adhesive masonry mortar, while improving bond strength, suffers from similar limitations. These findings offer valuable insights for the design and retrofitting of decoupled masonry infill walls.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"475 ","pages":"Article 141159"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthened decoupled masonry infill walls: An experimental study on out-of-plane performance under cyclic loads\",\"authors\":\"Sajad Karimi, Mohammad Reza Mirjalili\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Decoupling masonry infill walls has emerged as an effective strategy to mitigate several structural issues associated with traditional interacting infills, including in-plane damage, which can lead to premature out-of-plane failure, and the potential for inducing structural irregularities and short-column effects. However, this decoupling also amplifies out-of-plane bending moments in the infills, rendering them more vulnerable. Various strengthening techniques were investigated in this study to enhance their out-of-plane resistance. 13 pairs of specimens of horizontally perforated clay block infill walls were subjected to cyclic out-of-plane loading to assess strength, displacement, ductility, energy dissipation, and stiffness degradation. The effects of different strengthening techniques, including plastering, improvement of bed joint mortar adhesion, polypropylene (PP) fiber-reinforced plaster, glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh in widespread and strip configurations, welded wire mesh, and galvanized steel chicken wire mesh, were studied. Results indicate that unplastered walls exhibit inadequate out-of-plane resistance, necessitating strengthening measures. Cement-sand plaster significantly improves wall strength, suitable for regions with moderate seismic and wind loads. Welded wire mesh and widespread GFRP mesh emerged as effective strengthening options for high and extreme seismic and wind conditions, while strip GFRP mesh requires cautious application. Although the application of chicken wire mesh can enhance flexural strength, its inherent brittleness, as evidenced by its low ductility and energy dissipation capacity, renders it unsuitable for regions susceptible to moderate to high seismic activity. The use of adhesive masonry mortar, while improving bond strength, suffers from similar limitations. These findings offer valuable insights for the design and retrofitting of decoupled masonry infill walls.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"475 \",\"pages\":\"Article 141159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825013078\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825013078","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strengthened decoupled masonry infill walls: An experimental study on out-of-plane performance under cyclic loads
Decoupling masonry infill walls has emerged as an effective strategy to mitigate several structural issues associated with traditional interacting infills, including in-plane damage, which can lead to premature out-of-plane failure, and the potential for inducing structural irregularities and short-column effects. However, this decoupling also amplifies out-of-plane bending moments in the infills, rendering them more vulnerable. Various strengthening techniques were investigated in this study to enhance their out-of-plane resistance. 13 pairs of specimens of horizontally perforated clay block infill walls were subjected to cyclic out-of-plane loading to assess strength, displacement, ductility, energy dissipation, and stiffness degradation. The effects of different strengthening techniques, including plastering, improvement of bed joint mortar adhesion, polypropylene (PP) fiber-reinforced plaster, glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) mesh in widespread and strip configurations, welded wire mesh, and galvanized steel chicken wire mesh, were studied. Results indicate that unplastered walls exhibit inadequate out-of-plane resistance, necessitating strengthening measures. Cement-sand plaster significantly improves wall strength, suitable for regions with moderate seismic and wind loads. Welded wire mesh and widespread GFRP mesh emerged as effective strengthening options for high and extreme seismic and wind conditions, while strip GFRP mesh requires cautious application. Although the application of chicken wire mesh can enhance flexural strength, its inherent brittleness, as evidenced by its low ductility and energy dissipation capacity, renders it unsuitable for regions susceptible to moderate to high seismic activity. The use of adhesive masonry mortar, while improving bond strength, suffers from similar limitations. These findings offer valuable insights for the design and retrofitting of decoupled masonry infill walls.
期刊介绍:
Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged.
Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.