非药物支持治疗干预对脑肿瘤患者报告结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Deborah O'Doherty , Mark O'Donovan , Ros Lavery , Art B. Kelleher , Teresa Wills , Mohamad M. Saab
{"title":"非药物支持治疗干预对脑肿瘤患者报告结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Deborah O'Doherty ,&nbsp;Mark O'Donovan ,&nbsp;Ros Lavery ,&nbsp;Art B. Kelleher ,&nbsp;Teresa Wills ,&nbsp;Mohamad M. Saab","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Brain tumours are associated with significant disease burden with needs fluctuating throughout the disease trajectory. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions on patients with a primary brain tumour by means of patient-reported outcome measures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The following electronic databases were systematically searched: Academic Search Complete, APA PsycInfo, APA PsycArticles, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane, PubMed, and Web of Science. Additional records were located from Google Scholar, reference tracking, and hand searching. Title, abstract, and full-text screenings were completed by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted using a standardised extraction table. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Results were described via narrative synthesis or meta-analyses of standardised scores for randomised controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 1261 records, nine studies were included. Various interventions were utilised including five exercise-based interventions (aerobics, Pilates, yoga, in-patient rehabilitation and out-patient rehabilitation), two cognitive rehabilitation programs, and two psychosocial interventions. Eight of the nine interventions benefitted patients with statistically significant improvement to at least one aspect of their wellbeing. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials for all interventions found standardised mean improvements to the outcomes of quality of life (0.34, <em>p</em>-value = 0.037), psychological wellbeing (0.35, <em>p</em>-value = 0.001), cognitive symptoms (0.41, <em>p</em>-value = 0.016), and fatigue (0.31, <em>p</em>-value &lt;0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Non-pharmacological supportive care interventions showed positive effects in reducing symptom burden among patients with primary brain tumours. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102856"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions on patient-reported outcomes among patients with a brain tumour: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Deborah O'Doherty ,&nbsp;Mark O'Donovan ,&nbsp;Ros Lavery ,&nbsp;Art B. Kelleher ,&nbsp;Teresa Wills ,&nbsp;Mohamad M. Saab\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Brain tumours are associated with significant disease burden with needs fluctuating throughout the disease trajectory. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions on patients with a primary brain tumour by means of patient-reported outcome measures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The following electronic databases were systematically searched: Academic Search Complete, APA PsycInfo, APA PsycArticles, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane, PubMed, and Web of Science. Additional records were located from Google Scholar, reference tracking, and hand searching. Title, abstract, and full-text screenings were completed by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted using a standardised extraction table. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Results were described via narrative synthesis or meta-analyses of standardised scores for randomised controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 1261 records, nine studies were included. Various interventions were utilised including five exercise-based interventions (aerobics, Pilates, yoga, in-patient rehabilitation and out-patient rehabilitation), two cognitive rehabilitation programs, and two psychosocial interventions. Eight of the nine interventions benefitted patients with statistically significant improvement to at least one aspect of their wellbeing. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials for all interventions found standardised mean improvements to the outcomes of quality of life (0.34, <em>p</em>-value = 0.037), psychological wellbeing (0.35, <em>p</em>-value = 0.001), cognitive symptoms (0.41, <em>p</em>-value = 0.016), and fatigue (0.31, <em>p</em>-value &lt;0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Non-pharmacological supportive care interventions showed positive effects in reducing symptom burden among patients with primary brain tumours. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388925000808\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388925000808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的脑肿瘤与显著的疾病负担相关,其需求在整个疾病轨迹中波动。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是通过患者报告的结果测量来评估非药物支持治疗干预对原发性脑肿瘤患者的影响。方法系统检索Academic Search Complete、APA PsycInfo、APA PsycArticles、CINAHL Plus、Cochrane、PubMed、Web of Science等电子数据库。其他记录来自谷歌Scholar、参考文献追踪和手工检索。标题、摘要和全文筛选由两位独立审稿人完成。采用标准化提取表提取数据。采用混合方法评价工具进行质量评价。结果通过叙事综合或随机对照试验标准化评分的荟萃分析来描述。结果从1261份记录中纳入9项研究。采用了多种干预措施,包括五种基于运动的干预措施(有氧运动、普拉提、瑜伽、住院康复和门诊康复)、两种认知康复计划和两种心理社会干预措施。九项干预措施中有八项对患者有益,至少在一个方面有统计学上的显著改善。所有干预措施的随机对照试验荟萃分析发现,生活质量(0.34,p值= 0.037)、心理健康(0.35,p值= 0.001)、认知症状(0.41,p值= 0.016)和疲劳(0.31,p值<;0.001)的结果的标准化平均改善。结论非药物支持治疗干预对减轻原发性脑肿瘤患者的症状负担有积极作用。需要更大样本量的进一步研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions on patient-reported outcomes among patients with a brain tumour: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Brain tumours are associated with significant disease burden with needs fluctuating throughout the disease trajectory. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of non-pharmacological supportive care interventions on patients with a primary brain tumour by means of patient-reported outcome measures.

Methods

The following electronic databases were systematically searched: Academic Search Complete, APA PsycInfo, APA PsycArticles, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane, PubMed, and Web of Science. Additional records were located from Google Scholar, reference tracking, and hand searching. Title, abstract, and full-text screenings were completed by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted using a standardised extraction table. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Results were described via narrative synthesis or meta-analyses of standardised scores for randomised controlled trials.

Results

From 1261 records, nine studies were included. Various interventions were utilised including five exercise-based interventions (aerobics, Pilates, yoga, in-patient rehabilitation and out-patient rehabilitation), two cognitive rehabilitation programs, and two psychosocial interventions. Eight of the nine interventions benefitted patients with statistically significant improvement to at least one aspect of their wellbeing. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials for all interventions found standardised mean improvements to the outcomes of quality of life (0.34, p-value = 0.037), psychological wellbeing (0.35, p-value = 0.001), cognitive symptoms (0.41, p-value = 0.016), and fatigue (0.31, p-value <0.001).

Conclusion

Non-pharmacological supportive care interventions showed positive effects in reducing symptom burden among patients with primary brain tumours. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信