水管理的可持续性分析,重点是埃塞俄比亚科加灌溉计划的环境管理计划

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Abebe Belay Gebeyehu
{"title":"水管理的可持续性分析,重点是埃塞俄比亚科加灌溉计划的环境管理计划","authors":"Abebe Belay Gebeyehu","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study focused on investigating how Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA) recommended measures are supporting sustainable development. A five-member analysis group was established to ensure objectivity and consensus in addressing the Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) through mDSS software. The Pair-Wise Comparison (PWC) method developed by Saaty (1980) was used for assessing the criterion weights i.e. the relative importance of each pillar of sustainability; relative importance of measures to each pillar and the order of layers in wedding cake framework was determined. Furthermore, it aids in validating the criticisms made regarding the ordering of layers. This pairwise comparisons result gives social 6.3 percent, economic 26.5 percent of the criteria priority, and with the most important criteria being environment, at 67.2 percent. The economic pillar came in the middle layer of the wedding cake framework. The measures were not equally adapted to different pillars. These trade-offs appear to be particularly obvious in the short term, as long-term synergy among the pillars of sustainable development appears to be prominent. The ranking of measures depends on the sustainability framework of the relative importance of pillars and method of aggregation. The analysis shows that the EIA-recommended measures are likely to succeed in promoting sustainable development, especially when synergy in sustainable development is considered, as most of them are progressing well. The most favored adaptation and mitigation measures are training and extension courses, and planting forest seedlings. Planting forests appears to be the only method to achieve sustainable development in some circumstances under Wedding Cake framework. However, planting forest seedlings does not fully comprehend as a sustainable solution because of the negative consequences of eucalyptus plantations on environment and a threat to food security, as it is being planted in fertile lands. Proper planting and management are essential. The academia should also determine the suitable sustainable development framework of whether a triple bottom line or wedding cake framework should be adopted given the current environmental situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100667"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability analysis of water management, with emphasis on Environmental Management Plan (EMP) in Koga Irrigation Scheme, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Abebe Belay Gebeyehu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The study focused on investigating how Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA) recommended measures are supporting sustainable development. A five-member analysis group was established to ensure objectivity and consensus in addressing the Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) through mDSS software. The Pair-Wise Comparison (PWC) method developed by Saaty (1980) was used for assessing the criterion weights i.e. the relative importance of each pillar of sustainability; relative importance of measures to each pillar and the order of layers in wedding cake framework was determined. Furthermore, it aids in validating the criticisms made regarding the ordering of layers. This pairwise comparisons result gives social 6.3 percent, economic 26.5 percent of the criteria priority, and with the most important criteria being environment, at 67.2 percent. The economic pillar came in the middle layer of the wedding cake framework. The measures were not equally adapted to different pillars. These trade-offs appear to be particularly obvious in the short term, as long-term synergy among the pillars of sustainable development appears to be prominent. The ranking of measures depends on the sustainability framework of the relative importance of pillars and method of aggregation. The analysis shows that the EIA-recommended measures are likely to succeed in promoting sustainable development, especially when synergy in sustainable development is considered, as most of them are progressing well. The most favored adaptation and mitigation measures are training and extension courses, and planting forest seedlings. Planting forests appears to be the only method to achieve sustainable development in some circumstances under Wedding Cake framework. However, planting forest seedlings does not fully comprehend as a sustainable solution because of the negative consequences of eucalyptus plantations on environment and a threat to food security, as it is being planted in fertile lands. Proper planting and management are essential. The academia should also determine the suitable sustainable development framework of whether a triple bottom line or wedding cake framework should be adopted given the current environmental situations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725000881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725000881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的重点是调查环境影响分析(EIA)建议的措施如何支持可持续发展。成立了一个五人分析小组,以确保通过mDSS软件处理多准则分析的客观性和共识。Saaty(1980)开发的成对比较(PWC)方法用于评估标准权重,即每个可持续性支柱的相对重要性;确定了婚礼蛋糕框架中各支柱的相对重要性和层序。此外,它有助于验证关于层的排序所提出的批评。两两比较的结果显示,社会标准占6.3%,经济标准占26.5%,最重要的标准是环境,占67.2%。经济支柱出现在婚礼蛋糕框架的中间层。这些措施并没有平等地适用于不同的支柱。这些权衡在短期内似乎特别明显,因为可持续发展各支柱之间的长期协同作用似乎很突出。各项措施的排名取决于各支柱的相对重要性的可持续性框架和汇总方法。分析表明,环评所建议的措施很可能成功地促进可持续发展,特别是考虑到可持续发展的协同作用,因为大多数措施进展良好。最受欢迎的适应和缓解措施是培训和推广课程,以及种植森林幼苗。在婚礼蛋糕框架下,植树造林似乎是在某些情况下实现可持续发展的唯一方法。然而,由于桉树种植在肥沃的土地上,对环境造成负面影响,并对粮食安全构成威胁,因此种植森林幼苗并不是一种可持续的解决办法。适当的种植和管理是必不可少的。学术界也应该根据目前的环境状况,确定是否应该采用三重底线或婚礼蛋糕框架的合适的可持续发展框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability analysis of water management, with emphasis on Environmental Management Plan (EMP) in Koga Irrigation Scheme, Ethiopia
The study focused on investigating how Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA) recommended measures are supporting sustainable development. A five-member analysis group was established to ensure objectivity and consensus in addressing the Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) through mDSS software. The Pair-Wise Comparison (PWC) method developed by Saaty (1980) was used for assessing the criterion weights i.e. the relative importance of each pillar of sustainability; relative importance of measures to each pillar and the order of layers in wedding cake framework was determined. Furthermore, it aids in validating the criticisms made regarding the ordering of layers. This pairwise comparisons result gives social 6.3 percent, economic 26.5 percent of the criteria priority, and with the most important criteria being environment, at 67.2 percent. The economic pillar came in the middle layer of the wedding cake framework. The measures were not equally adapted to different pillars. These trade-offs appear to be particularly obvious in the short term, as long-term synergy among the pillars of sustainable development appears to be prominent. The ranking of measures depends on the sustainability framework of the relative importance of pillars and method of aggregation. The analysis shows that the EIA-recommended measures are likely to succeed in promoting sustainable development, especially when synergy in sustainable development is considered, as most of them are progressing well. The most favored adaptation and mitigation measures are training and extension courses, and planting forest seedlings. Planting forests appears to be the only method to achieve sustainable development in some circumstances under Wedding Cake framework. However, planting forest seedlings does not fully comprehend as a sustainable solution because of the negative consequences of eucalyptus plantations on environment and a threat to food security, as it is being planted in fertile lands. Proper planting and management are essential. The academia should also determine the suitable sustainable development framework of whether a triple bottom line or wedding cake framework should be adopted given the current environmental situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信