Gernot Pfitscher, Christina Taferner, Chiara Marketz, Kathrin Sevecke, Silvia Exenberger
{"title":"奥地利Covid-19大流行后儿童的创伤后成长:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Gernot Pfitscher, Christina Taferner, Chiara Marketz, Kathrin Sevecke, Silvia Exenberger","doi":"10.1007/s10902-025-00891-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a paucity of research exploring the potential positive changes in the aftermath of a crisis from the perspective of children. The present study sought to address this gap by examining posttraumatic growth (PTG) among North Tyrolean (Austria) and South Tyrolean (Northern Italy) children aged 8–12 at the final phase of the Covid COVID-19 crisis utilising a convergent parallel mixed methods design. In total, 101 children (50.5% girls) participated in an online study exploring the factor structure of the German Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children and the relationship between posttraumatic growth and distress (as measured by the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen). Twenty of these children participated in an interview and answered questions about in which ways they are, feel or think differently since the crisis. The results of the principal component analysis indicated a three-factor structure: interpersonal, person-centred, and spiritual change dimension of growth. The total scores of the German PTGI-C-R were positively associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms. The qualitative findings revealed four PTG dimensions that corresponded to the original growth dimensions. The children did not mention spiritual change, however, a new growth dimension emerged “adjustment to new circumstances”. The themes “relationships” and “adjustment to new circumstances” were found to be positive and negative in nature, and were assigned to PTG and PTD, respectively. In conclusion, the results support Tedeschi and Calhoun’s growth model. The children exhibited a holistic perspective of the crisis encompassing both negative and possible positive aspects. The interconnectedness of resilience and the cornerstones of positive psychology underscore the imperative for the promotion of both in non-crisis contexts, thereby enhancing the likelihood of children deriving positive outcomes from such periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":15837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Happiness Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children’s Posttraumatic Growth in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Austria: A Mixed Methods Study\",\"authors\":\"Gernot Pfitscher, Christina Taferner, Chiara Marketz, Kathrin Sevecke, Silvia Exenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10902-025-00891-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is a paucity of research exploring the potential positive changes in the aftermath of a crisis from the perspective of children. The present study sought to address this gap by examining posttraumatic growth (PTG) among North Tyrolean (Austria) and South Tyrolean (Northern Italy) children aged 8–12 at the final phase of the Covid COVID-19 crisis utilising a convergent parallel mixed methods design. In total, 101 children (50.5% girls) participated in an online study exploring the factor structure of the German Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children and the relationship between posttraumatic growth and distress (as measured by the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen). Twenty of these children participated in an interview and answered questions about in which ways they are, feel or think differently since the crisis. The results of the principal component analysis indicated a three-factor structure: interpersonal, person-centred, and spiritual change dimension of growth. The total scores of the German PTGI-C-R were positively associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms. The qualitative findings revealed four PTG dimensions that corresponded to the original growth dimensions. The children did not mention spiritual change, however, a new growth dimension emerged “adjustment to new circumstances”. The themes “relationships” and “adjustment to new circumstances” were found to be positive and negative in nature, and were assigned to PTG and PTD, respectively. In conclusion, the results support Tedeschi and Calhoun’s growth model. The children exhibited a holistic perspective of the crisis encompassing both negative and possible positive aspects. The interconnectedness of resilience and the cornerstones of positive psychology underscore the imperative for the promotion of both in non-crisis contexts, thereby enhancing the likelihood of children deriving positive outcomes from such periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Happiness Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Happiness Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00891-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Happiness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00891-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Children’s Posttraumatic Growth in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Austria: A Mixed Methods Study
There is a paucity of research exploring the potential positive changes in the aftermath of a crisis from the perspective of children. The present study sought to address this gap by examining posttraumatic growth (PTG) among North Tyrolean (Austria) and South Tyrolean (Northern Italy) children aged 8–12 at the final phase of the Covid COVID-19 crisis utilising a convergent parallel mixed methods design. In total, 101 children (50.5% girls) participated in an online study exploring the factor structure of the German Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children and the relationship between posttraumatic growth and distress (as measured by the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen). Twenty of these children participated in an interview and answered questions about in which ways they are, feel or think differently since the crisis. The results of the principal component analysis indicated a three-factor structure: interpersonal, person-centred, and spiritual change dimension of growth. The total scores of the German PTGI-C-R were positively associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms. The qualitative findings revealed four PTG dimensions that corresponded to the original growth dimensions. The children did not mention spiritual change, however, a new growth dimension emerged “adjustment to new circumstances”. The themes “relationships” and “adjustment to new circumstances” were found to be positive and negative in nature, and were assigned to PTG and PTD, respectively. In conclusion, the results support Tedeschi and Calhoun’s growth model. The children exhibited a holistic perspective of the crisis encompassing both negative and possible positive aspects. The interconnectedness of resilience and the cornerstones of positive psychology underscore the imperative for the promotion of both in non-crisis contexts, thereby enhancing the likelihood of children deriving positive outcomes from such periods.
期刊介绍:
The international peer-reviewed Journal of Happiness Studies is devoted to theoretical and applied advancements in all areas of well-being research. It covers topics referring to both the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives characterizing well-being studies. The former includes the investigation of cognitive dimensions such as satisfaction with life, and positive affect and emotions. The latter includes the study of constructs and processes related to optimal psychological functioning, such as meaning and purpose in life, character strengths, personal growth, resilience, optimism, hope, and self-determination. In addition to contributions on appraisal of life-as-a-whole, the journal accepts papers investigating these topics in relation to specific domains, such as family, education, physical and mental health, and work.
The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and empirical submissions in the fields of economics, psychology and sociology, as well as contributions from researchers in the domains of education, medicine, philosophy and other related fields.
The Journal of Happiness Studies provides a forum for three main areas in happiness research: 1) theoretical conceptualizations of well-being, happiness and the good life; 2) empirical investigation of well-being and happiness in different populations, contexts and cultures; 3) methodological advancements and development of new assessment instruments.
The journal addresses the conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of happiness and well-being dimensions, as well as the individual, socio-economic and cultural factors that may interact with them as determinants or outcomes.
Central Questions include, but are not limited to:
Conceptualization:
What meanings are denoted by terms like happiness and well-being?
How do these fit in with broader conceptions of the good life?
Operationalization and Measurement:
Which methods can be used to assess how people feel about life?
How to operationalize a new construct or an understudied dimension in the well-being domain?
What are the best measures for investigating specific well-being related constructs and dimensions?
Prevalence and causality
Do individuals belonging to different populations and cultures vary in their well-being ratings?
How does individual well-being relate to social and economic phenomena (characteristics, circumstances, behavior, events, and policies)?
What are the personal, social and economic determinants and causes of individual well-being dimensions?
Evaluation:
What are the consequences of well-being for individual development and socio-economic progress?
Are individual happiness and well-being worthwhile goals for governments and policy makers?
Does well-being represent a useful parameter to orient planning in physical and mental healthcare, and in public health?
Interdisciplinary studies:
How has the study of happiness developed within and across disciplines?
Can we link philosophical thought and empirical research?
What are the biological correlates of well-being dimensions?