奥地利Covid-19大流行后儿童的创伤后成长:一项混合方法研究

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gernot Pfitscher, Christina Taferner, Chiara Marketz, Kathrin Sevecke, Silvia Exenberger
{"title":"奥地利Covid-19大流行后儿童的创伤后成长:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Gernot Pfitscher, Christina Taferner, Chiara Marketz, Kathrin Sevecke, Silvia Exenberger","doi":"10.1007/s10902-025-00891-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a paucity of research exploring the potential positive changes in the aftermath of a crisis from the perspective of children. The present study sought to address this gap by examining posttraumatic growth (PTG) among North Tyrolean (Austria) and South Tyrolean (Northern Italy) children aged 8–12 at the final phase of the Covid COVID-19 crisis utilising a convergent parallel mixed methods design. In total, 101 children (50.5% girls) participated in an online study exploring the factor structure of the German Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children and the relationship between posttraumatic growth and distress (as measured by the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen). Twenty of these children participated in an interview and answered questions about in which ways they are, feel or think differently since the crisis. The results of the principal component analysis indicated a three-factor structure: interpersonal, person-centred, and spiritual change dimension of growth. The total scores of the German PTGI-C-R were positively associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms. The qualitative findings revealed four PTG dimensions that corresponded to the original growth dimensions. The children did not mention spiritual change, however, a new growth dimension emerged “adjustment to new circumstances”. The themes “relationships” and “adjustment to new circumstances” were found to be positive and negative in nature, and were assigned to PTG and PTD, respectively. In conclusion, the results support Tedeschi and Calhoun’s growth model. The children exhibited a holistic perspective of the crisis encompassing both negative and possible positive aspects. The interconnectedness of resilience and the cornerstones of positive psychology underscore the imperative for the promotion of both in non-crisis contexts, thereby enhancing the likelihood of children deriving positive outcomes from such periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":15837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Happiness Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children’s Posttraumatic Growth in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Austria: A Mixed Methods Study\",\"authors\":\"Gernot Pfitscher, Christina Taferner, Chiara Marketz, Kathrin Sevecke, Silvia Exenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10902-025-00891-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is a paucity of research exploring the potential positive changes in the aftermath of a crisis from the perspective of children. The present study sought to address this gap by examining posttraumatic growth (PTG) among North Tyrolean (Austria) and South Tyrolean (Northern Italy) children aged 8–12 at the final phase of the Covid COVID-19 crisis utilising a convergent parallel mixed methods design. In total, 101 children (50.5% girls) participated in an online study exploring the factor structure of the German Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children and the relationship between posttraumatic growth and distress (as measured by the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen). Twenty of these children participated in an interview and answered questions about in which ways they are, feel or think differently since the crisis. The results of the principal component analysis indicated a three-factor structure: interpersonal, person-centred, and spiritual change dimension of growth. The total scores of the German PTGI-C-R were positively associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms. The qualitative findings revealed four PTG dimensions that corresponded to the original growth dimensions. The children did not mention spiritual change, however, a new growth dimension emerged “adjustment to new circumstances”. The themes “relationships” and “adjustment to new circumstances” were found to be positive and negative in nature, and were assigned to PTG and PTD, respectively. In conclusion, the results support Tedeschi and Calhoun’s growth model. The children exhibited a holistic perspective of the crisis encompassing both negative and possible positive aspects. The interconnectedness of resilience and the cornerstones of positive psychology underscore the imperative for the promotion of both in non-crisis contexts, thereby enhancing the likelihood of children deriving positive outcomes from such periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Happiness Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Happiness Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00891-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Happiness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00891-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从儿童的角度探讨危机后潜在的积极变化的研究很少。本研究试图通过采用融合并行混合方法设计,在Covid -19危机的最后阶段检查北蒂罗尔(奥地利)和南蒂罗尔(意大利北部)8-12岁儿童的创伤后生长(PTG),来解决这一差距。共有101名儿童(50.5%为女孩)参加了一项在线研究,探讨了德国儿童创伤后成长量表的因素结构以及创伤后成长与痛苦之间的关系(通过儿童和青少年创伤筛查来测量)。其中20名儿童参加了一次采访,并回答了自危机以来他们在哪些方面有所不同,感受或思考的问题。主成分分析结果表明,成长维度具有人际、以人为本、心灵变化三个维度。德国PTGI-C-R总分与创伤后应激症状呈正相关。定性结果显示四个PTG维度对应于原始生长维度。孩子们没有提到精神上的变化,然而,一个新的成长维度出现了“适应新环境”。“关系”和“适应新环境”这两个主题在本质上是积极的和消极的,分别被分配给PTG和PTD。综上所述,结果支持Tedeschi和Calhoun的增长模型。孩子们表现出对危机的整体看法,包括消极和可能的积极方面。弹性的相互联系和积极心理学的基石强调了在非危机环境中促进两者的必要性,从而提高了儿童从这些时期获得积极结果的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children’s Posttraumatic Growth in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Austria: A Mixed Methods Study

There is a paucity of research exploring the potential positive changes in the aftermath of a crisis from the perspective of children. The present study sought to address this gap by examining posttraumatic growth (PTG) among North Tyrolean (Austria) and South Tyrolean (Northern Italy) children aged 8–12 at the final phase of the Covid COVID-19 crisis utilising a convergent parallel mixed methods design. In total, 101 children (50.5% girls) participated in an online study exploring the factor structure of the German Posttraumatic Growth Inventory for Children and the relationship between posttraumatic growth and distress (as measured by the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen). Twenty of these children participated in an interview and answered questions about in which ways they are, feel or think differently since the crisis. The results of the principal component analysis indicated a three-factor structure: interpersonal, person-centred, and spiritual change dimension of growth. The total scores of the German PTGI-C-R were positively associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms. The qualitative findings revealed four PTG dimensions that corresponded to the original growth dimensions. The children did not mention spiritual change, however, a new growth dimension emerged “adjustment to new circumstances”. The themes “relationships” and “adjustment to new circumstances” were found to be positive and negative in nature, and were assigned to PTG and PTD, respectively. In conclusion, the results support Tedeschi and Calhoun’s growth model. The children exhibited a holistic perspective of the crisis encompassing both negative and possible positive aspects. The interconnectedness of resilience and the cornerstones of positive psychology underscore the imperative for the promotion of both in non-crisis contexts, thereby enhancing the likelihood of children deriving positive outcomes from such periods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The international peer-reviewed Journal of Happiness Studies is devoted to theoretical and applied advancements in all areas of well-being research. It covers topics referring to both the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives characterizing well-being studies. The former includes the investigation of cognitive dimensions such as satisfaction with life, and positive affect and emotions. The latter includes the study of constructs and processes related to optimal psychological functioning, such as meaning and purpose in life, character strengths, personal growth, resilience, optimism, hope, and self-determination. In addition to contributions on appraisal of life-as-a-whole, the journal accepts papers investigating these topics in relation to specific domains, such as family, education, physical and mental health, and work. The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and empirical submissions in the fields of economics, psychology and sociology, as well as contributions from researchers in the domains of education, medicine, philosophy and other related fields. The Journal of Happiness Studies provides a forum for three main areas in happiness research: 1) theoretical conceptualizations of well-being, happiness and the good life; 2) empirical investigation of well-being and happiness in different populations, contexts and cultures; 3) methodological advancements and development of new assessment instruments. The journal addresses the conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of happiness and well-being dimensions, as well as the individual, socio-economic and cultural factors that may interact with them as determinants or outcomes. Central Questions include, but are not limited to: Conceptualization: What meanings are denoted by terms like happiness and well-being? How do these fit in with broader conceptions of the good life? Operationalization and Measurement: Which methods can be used to assess how people feel about life? How to operationalize a new construct or an understudied dimension in the well-being domain? What are the best measures for investigating specific well-being related constructs and dimensions? Prevalence and causality Do individuals belonging to different populations and cultures vary in their well-being ratings? How does individual well-being relate to social and economic phenomena (characteristics, circumstances, behavior, events, and policies)? What are the personal, social and economic determinants and causes of individual well-being dimensions? Evaluation: What are the consequences of well-being for individual development and socio-economic progress? Are individual happiness and well-being worthwhile goals for governments and policy makers? Does well-being represent a useful parameter to orient planning in physical and mental healthcare, and in public health? Interdisciplinary studies: How has the study of happiness developed within and across disciplines? Can we link philosophical thought and empirical research? What are the biological correlates of well-being dimensions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信