{"title":"通过将 CFD 和机器学习相结合,快速预测流化床的不同流态流场","authors":"Hang Shu , Xuejiao Liu , Xi Chen , Wenqi Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.ces.2025.121635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with machine learning to predict the complex dynamics in fluidized beds faces significant challenges. This study employed Multiphase Particle-In-Cell (MP-PIC) simulations coupled with a hybrid machine learning algorithm based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) to analyze dataset construction, feature extraction, and regression modeling under varying operational conditions. Results demonstrate that, compared to the fixed bed, the bubbling bed demands fourfold pressure and sixfold particle volume fraction data, while the turbulent bed exhibits sixfold and twofold, respectively. Feature extraction rates differ by bed type: the fixed and turbulent bed share the highest rate for pressure (95 %), exceeding the bubbling bed (90 %); while the fixed bed leads in particle volume fraction (95 %), with the bubbling and turbulent bed at 75 %. The machine-learning-enhanced framework could achieve 4–5 orders of magnitude acceleration compared to the conventional numerical method while retaining accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":271,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Science","volume":"312 ","pages":"Article 121635"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid prediction of the flow fields of fluidized beds with the varying flow regimes by coupling CFD and machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Hang Shu , Xuejiao Liu , Xi Chen , Wenqi Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ces.2025.121635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Integrating Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with machine learning to predict the complex dynamics in fluidized beds faces significant challenges. This study employed Multiphase Particle-In-Cell (MP-PIC) simulations coupled with a hybrid machine learning algorithm based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) to analyze dataset construction, feature extraction, and regression modeling under varying operational conditions. Results demonstrate that, compared to the fixed bed, the bubbling bed demands fourfold pressure and sixfold particle volume fraction data, while the turbulent bed exhibits sixfold and twofold, respectively. Feature extraction rates differ by bed type: the fixed and turbulent bed share the highest rate for pressure (95 %), exceeding the bubbling bed (90 %); while the fixed bed leads in particle volume fraction (95 %), with the bubbling and turbulent bed at 75 %. The machine-learning-enhanced framework could achieve 4–5 orders of magnitude acceleration compared to the conventional numerical method while retaining accuracy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Engineering Science\",\"volume\":\"312 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Engineering Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009250925004580\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009250925004580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rapid prediction of the flow fields of fluidized beds with the varying flow regimes by coupling CFD and machine learning
Integrating Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with machine learning to predict the complex dynamics in fluidized beds faces significant challenges. This study employed Multiphase Particle-In-Cell (MP-PIC) simulations coupled with a hybrid machine learning algorithm based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) to analyze dataset construction, feature extraction, and regression modeling under varying operational conditions. Results demonstrate that, compared to the fixed bed, the bubbling bed demands fourfold pressure and sixfold particle volume fraction data, while the turbulent bed exhibits sixfold and twofold, respectively. Feature extraction rates differ by bed type: the fixed and turbulent bed share the highest rate for pressure (95 %), exceeding the bubbling bed (90 %); while the fixed bed leads in particle volume fraction (95 %), with the bubbling and turbulent bed at 75 %. The machine-learning-enhanced framework could achieve 4–5 orders of magnitude acceleration compared to the conventional numerical method while retaining accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Chemical engineering enables the transformation of natural resources and energy into useful products for society. It draws on and applies natural sciences, mathematics and economics, and has developed fundamental engineering science that underpins the discipline.
Chemical Engineering Science (CES) has been publishing papers on the fundamentals of chemical engineering since 1951. CES is the platform where the most significant advances in the discipline have ever since been published. Chemical Engineering Science has accompanied and sustained chemical engineering through its development into the vibrant and broad scientific discipline it is today.