哈马斯10月7日的袭击：对“敌对”危机的分析

IF 6.1 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1111/puar.13955

Federico Toth

{"title":"哈马斯10月7日的袭击：对“敌对”危机的分析","authors":"Federico Toth","doi":"10.1111/puar.13955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to interpret the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023 in light of crisis management theories, seeking to draw from this event some general lessons about the nature of crises, their determinants, and how they are managed. More specifically, the article addresses three questions: (1) Why did Israel underestimate the warning signs and fail to prevent the attack? (2) What decision‐making logic did the Israeli government adopt in responding to the attack? (3) What kind of crisis is the one being analyzed? In the article, it is proposed to adopt the category of “antagonistic crises,” that is of crises that are caused by human beings, who act intentionally with the stated goal of getting the other party into trouble. The logic of appropriateness is used to interpret the response to the attack by the Netanyahu government.","PeriodicalId":48431,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration Review","volume":"217 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hamas's October 7 Attack: Analysis of an “Antagonistic” Crisis\",\"authors\":\"Federico Toth\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/puar.13955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the article is to interpret the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023 in light of crisis management theories, seeking to draw from this event some general lessons about the nature of crises, their determinants, and how they are managed. More specifically, the article addresses three questions: (1) Why did Israel underestimate the warning signs and fail to prevent the attack? (2) What decision‐making logic did the Israeli government adopt in responding to the attack? (3) What kind of crisis is the one being analyzed? In the article, it is proposed to adopt the category of “antagonistic crises,” that is of crises that are caused by human beings, who act intentionally with the stated goal of getting the other party into trouble. The logic of appropriateness is used to interpret the response to the attack by the Netanyahu government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration Review\",\"volume\":\"217 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13955\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13955","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是根据危机管理理论来解释2023年10月7日的哈马斯袭击事件，试图从这一事件中得出一些关于危机的本质、决定因素以及如何管理危机的一般教训。更具体地说，这篇文章解决了三个问题：(1)为什么以色列低估了警告信号而未能阻止袭击？(2)以色列政府在应对袭击时采取了什么决策逻辑？(3)正在分析的危机是什么样的？在文章中，建议采用“对抗性危机”的类别，即由人类引起的危机，他们故意采取行动，其既定目标是使另一方陷入困境。适当的逻辑被用来解释内塔尼亚胡政府对袭击的反应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hamas's October 7 Attack: Analysis of an “Antagonistic” Crisis

The aim of the article is to interpret the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023 in light of crisis management theories, seeking to draw from this event some general lessons about the nature of crises, their determinants, and how they are managed. More specifically, the article addresses three questions: (1) Why did Israel underestimate the warning signs and fail to prevent the attack? (2) What decision‐making logic did the Israeli government adopt in responding to the attack? (3) What kind of crisis is the one being analyzed? In the article, it is proposed to adopt the category of “antagonistic crises,” that is of crises that are caused by human beings, who act intentionally with the stated goal of getting the other party into trouble. The logic of appropriateness is used to interpret the response to the attack by the Netanyahu government.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Public Administration Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-

CiteScore

15.10

自引率

10.80%

发文量

130

期刊介绍： Public Administration Review (PAR), a bi-monthly professional journal, has held its position as the premier outlet for public administration research, theory, and practice for 75 years. Published for the American Society for Public Administration,TM/SM, it uniquely serves both academics and practitioners in the public sector. PAR features articles that identify and analyze current trends, offer a factual basis for decision-making, stimulate discussion, and present leading literature in an easily accessible format. Covering a diverse range of topics and featuring expert book reviews, PAR is both exciting to read and an indispensable resource in the field.