开发和验证预测算法,以确定结核病在两个大型加州卫生系统

IF 15.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Heidi Fischer, Lei Qian, Zhuoxin Li, Katia Bruxvoort, Jacek Skarbinski, Yuching Ni, Jennifer H. Ku, Bruno Lewin, Saadiq Garba, Parag Mahale, Sally F. Shaw, Brigitte Spence, Sara Y. Tartof
{"title":"开发和验证预测算法,以确定结核病在两个大型加州卫生系统","authors":"Heidi Fischer, Lei Qian, Zhuoxin Li, Katia Bruxvoort, Jacek Skarbinski, Yuching Ni, Jennifer H. Ku, Bruno Lewin, Saadiq Garba, Parag Mahale, Sally F. Shaw, Brigitte Spence, Sara Y. Tartof","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-58775-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>California data demonstrate failures in latent tuberculosis screening to prevent progression to tuberculosis disease. Therefore, we developed a clinical risk prediction model for tuberculosis disease using electronic health records. This study included Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Northern California members ≥18 years during 2008-2019. Models used Cox proportional hazards regression, Harrell’s C-statistic, and a simulated TB disease outcome accounting for cases prevented by current screening which includes both observed and simulated cases. We compared sensitivity and number-needed-to-screen for model-identified high-risk individuals with current screening. Of 4,032,619 and 4,051,873 Southern and Northern California members, tuberculosis disease incidences were 4.1 and 3.3 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The final model C-statistic was 0.816 (95% simulation interval 0.805-0.824). Model sensitivity screening high-risk individuals was 0.70 (0.68-0.71) and number-needed-to-screen was 662 (646-679) persons-per tuberculosis disease case, compared to a sensitivity of 0.36 (0.34-0.38) and number-needed-to-screen of 1632 (1485-1774) with current screening. Here, we show our predictive model improves tuberculosis screening efficiency in California.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of prediction algorithm to identify tuberculosis in two large California health systems\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Fischer, Lei Qian, Zhuoxin Li, Katia Bruxvoort, Jacek Skarbinski, Yuching Ni, Jennifer H. Ku, Bruno Lewin, Saadiq Garba, Parag Mahale, Sally F. Shaw, Brigitte Spence, Sara Y. Tartof\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41467-025-58775-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>California data demonstrate failures in latent tuberculosis screening to prevent progression to tuberculosis disease. Therefore, we developed a clinical risk prediction model for tuberculosis disease using electronic health records. This study included Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Northern California members ≥18 years during 2008-2019. Models used Cox proportional hazards regression, Harrell’s C-statistic, and a simulated TB disease outcome accounting for cases prevented by current screening which includes both observed and simulated cases. We compared sensitivity and number-needed-to-screen for model-identified high-risk individuals with current screening. Of 4,032,619 and 4,051,873 Southern and Northern California members, tuberculosis disease incidences were 4.1 and 3.3 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The final model C-statistic was 0.816 (95% simulation interval 0.805-0.824). Model sensitivity screening high-risk individuals was 0.70 (0.68-0.71) and number-needed-to-screen was 662 (646-679) persons-per tuberculosis disease case, compared to a sensitivity of 0.36 (0.34-0.38) and number-needed-to-screen of 1632 (1485-1774) with current screening. Here, we show our predictive model improves tuberculosis screening efficiency in California.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Communications\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58775-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58775-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加州的数据表明,潜伏性结核病筛查未能预防结核病的进展。因此,我们开发了一个使用电子健康记录的结核病临床风险预测模型。本研究纳入了2008-2019年Kaiser Permanente南加州和北加州≥18岁的会员。模型使用Cox比例风险回归、Harrell’s c统计量和模拟结核病结果来计算当前筛查预防的病例,其中包括观察病例和模拟病例。我们比较了模型识别的高危个体与当前筛查的敏感性和需要筛查的数量。在南加州和北加州的4,032,619和4,051,873名成员中,结核病发病率分别为每10万人年4.1和3.3例。最终模型c统计量为0.816(95%模拟区间0.805 ~ 0.824)。模型敏感性筛选高风险个体为0.70(0.68-0.71),每个结核病病例需要筛查的人数为662(646-679)人,而当前筛查的敏感性为0.36(0.34-0.38),需要筛查的人数为1632(1485-1774)。在这里,我们展示了我们的预测模型提高了加州肺结核筛查的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and validation of prediction algorithm to identify tuberculosis in two large California health systems

Development and validation of prediction algorithm to identify tuberculosis in two large California health systems

California data demonstrate failures in latent tuberculosis screening to prevent progression to tuberculosis disease. Therefore, we developed a clinical risk prediction model for tuberculosis disease using electronic health records. This study included Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Northern California members ≥18 years during 2008-2019. Models used Cox proportional hazards regression, Harrell’s C-statistic, and a simulated TB disease outcome accounting for cases prevented by current screening which includes both observed and simulated cases. We compared sensitivity and number-needed-to-screen for model-identified high-risk individuals with current screening. Of 4,032,619 and 4,051,873 Southern and Northern California members, tuberculosis disease incidences were 4.1 and 3.3 cases per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The final model C-statistic was 0.816 (95% simulation interval 0.805-0.824). Model sensitivity screening high-risk individuals was 0.70 (0.68-0.71) and number-needed-to-screen was 662 (646-679) persons-per tuberculosis disease case, compared to a sensitivity of 0.36 (0.34-0.38) and number-needed-to-screen of 1632 (1485-1774) with current screening. Here, we show our predictive model improves tuberculosis screening efficiency in California.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Communications
Nature Communications Biological Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
6928
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信