{"title":"基于脑电图时频分析的机器学习阿尔茨海默病检测。","authors":"Sérgio Daniel Rodrigues, Pedro Miguel Rodrigues","doi":"10.14440/jbm.2025.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. The lack of effective prevention or cure makes AD a significant concern, as it is a progressive disease with symptoms that worsen over time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop an algorithm capable of differentiating between patients with early-stage AD (mild cognitive impairment [MCI]), moderate AD, and healthy controls (C) using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A publicly available EEG database was utilized, with seven EEG recordings selected from each study group (MCI, AD, and C) to ensure a balanced dataset. For each 1-s segment of EEG data, 43 time-frequency features were computed. These features were then compressed over time using 10 statistical measures. Subsequently, 15 classifiers were employed to distinguish between paired groups using a 7-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strategy yielded better results than state-of-the-art methods, achieving a 100% accuracy in both C versus MCI and C versus AD binary classifications. This improvement translated to a 2% increase in accuracy for C versus MCI and a 4% increase for C versus AD, despite a 1.2% decrease in performance for AD versus MCI. In addition, the proposed method outperformed prior work on the same database by 4.8% for the AD versus MCI comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study highlights the potential of EEG as a promising tool for early AD diagnosis. Nevertheless, a more extensive database should be used to enhance the generalizability of the results in future work.</p>","PeriodicalId":73618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological methods","volume":"12 1","pages":"e99010042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electroencephalogram-based time-frequency analysis for Alzheimer's disease detection using machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Sérgio Daniel Rodrigues, Pedro Miguel Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.14440/jbm.2025.0069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. The lack of effective prevention or cure makes AD a significant concern, as it is a progressive disease with symptoms that worsen over time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop an algorithm capable of differentiating between patients with early-stage AD (mild cognitive impairment [MCI]), moderate AD, and healthy controls (C) using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A publicly available EEG database was utilized, with seven EEG recordings selected from each study group (MCI, AD, and C) to ensure a balanced dataset. For each 1-s segment of EEG data, 43 time-frequency features were computed. These features were then compressed over time using 10 statistical measures. Subsequently, 15 classifiers were employed to distinguish between paired groups using a 7-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strategy yielded better results than state-of-the-art methods, achieving a 100% accuracy in both C versus MCI and C versus AD binary classifications. This improvement translated to a 2% increase in accuracy for C versus MCI and a 4% increase for C versus AD, despite a 1.2% decrease in performance for AD versus MCI. In addition, the proposed method outperformed prior work on the same database by 4.8% for the AD versus MCI comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study highlights the potential of EEG as a promising tool for early AD diagnosis. Nevertheless, a more extensive database should be used to enhance the generalizability of the results in future work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biological methods\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"e99010042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2025.0069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/jbm.2025.0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electroencephalogram-based time-frequency analysis for Alzheimer's disease detection using machine learning.
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. The lack of effective prevention or cure makes AD a significant concern, as it is a progressive disease with symptoms that worsen over time.
Objective: The aim of this study is to develop an algorithm capable of differentiating between patients with early-stage AD (mild cognitive impairment [MCI]), moderate AD, and healthy controls (C) using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals.
Methods: A publicly available EEG database was utilized, with seven EEG recordings selected from each study group (MCI, AD, and C) to ensure a balanced dataset. For each 1-s segment of EEG data, 43 time-frequency features were computed. These features were then compressed over time using 10 statistical measures. Subsequently, 15 classifiers were employed to distinguish between paired groups using a 7-fold cross-validation.
Results: The strategy yielded better results than state-of-the-art methods, achieving a 100% accuracy in both C versus MCI and C versus AD binary classifications. This improvement translated to a 2% increase in accuracy for C versus MCI and a 4% increase for C versus AD, despite a 1.2% decrease in performance for AD versus MCI. In addition, the proposed method outperformed prior work on the same database by 4.8% for the AD versus MCI comparison.
Conclusion: The present study highlights the potential of EEG as a promising tool for early AD diagnosis. Nevertheless, a more extensive database should be used to enhance the generalizability of the results in future work.