Youngtaek Hong, Hyunseok Jeong, Younggul Jang, Ran Heo, Seung-Ah Lee, Yeonyee E Yoon, Jina Lee, Hyung-Bok Park, Hyuk-Jae Chang
{"title":"Predicting categories of coronary artery calcium scores from chest X-ray images using deep learning.","authors":"Youngtaek Hong, Hyunseok Jeong, Younggul Jang, Ran Heo, Seung-Ah Lee, Yeonyee E Yoon, Jina Lee, Hyung-Bok Park, Hyuk-Jae Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score (CACS) is recommended in clinical guidelines for coronary artery disease evaluation. However, it is being replaced by coronary computed tomography angiography as the primary diagnostic tool for patients with stable chest pain. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model for predicting the CACS categories from chest X-ray radiographs (CXRs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 10,230 patients with available CXRs and CACSs obtained within six months. Three models were trained based on the CACS thresholds (0, 100, and 400) to distinguish zero from non-zero CACSs, CACSs of <100 and ​≥ ​100, and CACS of <400 and ​≥ ​400. The final CXR integration models incorporating clinical factors, including age, sex, and body mass index, were also trained. All models were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. External validation was also performed. We experimentally demonstrated the prognostic value of the predicted CACS for major adverse cardiovascular events, comparing it to the actual CACS classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CACS classification performance of the deep learning model was promising, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.74 (zero vs non-zero), 0.75 (<100 vs. ≥100), and 0.79 (<400 vs. ≥400). The accuracy of the model further improved upon the integration of clinical factors; the AUCs reached 0.77, 0.79, and 0.82, respectively, for the same CACS categories. The external validation results were consistent (AUCs of 0.78, 0.79, and 0.81, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The deep learning model effectively classified the CACS from CXRs, especially for cases of severe calcification. This approach can cost-effectively improve coronary artery disease risk assessment and support clinical decision-making while minimizing radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2025.03.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分(CACS)是临床指南推荐的冠状动脉疾病评估方法。然而,它正被冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影取代,成为稳定型胸痛患者的主要诊断工具。本研究旨在开发并验证一种深度学习模型,用于预测胸部X光片(CXR)中的CACS类别:我们纳入了 10,230 名在六个月内获得 CXR 和 CACS 的患者。根据 CACS 阈值(0、100 和 400)训练了三个模型,以区分零和非零 CACS、CACS 的结果:深度学习模型的 CACS 分类性能良好,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.74(零与非零)、0.75(结论:深度学习模型能有效地对 CACS 进行分类:深度学习模型能有效地对 CXR 中的 CACS 进行分类,尤其是对严重钙化的病例。这种方法可以经济有效地改善冠状动脉疾病风险评估,支持临床决策,同时最大限度地减少辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting categories of coronary artery calcium scores from chest X-ray images using deep learning.

Background: The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score (CACS) is recommended in clinical guidelines for coronary artery disease evaluation. However, it is being replaced by coronary computed tomography angiography as the primary diagnostic tool for patients with stable chest pain. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model for predicting the CACS categories from chest X-ray radiographs (CXRs).

Methods: We included 10,230 patients with available CXRs and CACSs obtained within six months. Three models were trained based on the CACS thresholds (0, 100, and 400) to distinguish zero from non-zero CACSs, CACSs of <100 and ​≥ ​100, and CACS of <400 and ​≥ ​400. The final CXR integration models incorporating clinical factors, including age, sex, and body mass index, were also trained. All models were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. External validation was also performed. We experimentally demonstrated the prognostic value of the predicted CACS for major adverse cardiovascular events, comparing it to the actual CACS classification.

Results: The CACS classification performance of the deep learning model was promising, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.74 (zero vs non-zero), 0.75 (<100 vs. ≥100), and 0.79 (<400 vs. ≥400). The accuracy of the model further improved upon the integration of clinical factors; the AUCs reached 0.77, 0.79, and 0.82, respectively, for the same CACS categories. The external validation results were consistent (AUCs of 0.78, 0.79, and 0.81, respectively).

Conclusions: The deep learning model effectively classified the CACS from CXRs, especially for cases of severe calcification. This approach can cost-effectively improve coronary artery disease risk assessment and support clinical decision-making while minimizing radiation exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信