Andrew Gibbs, Zama Khoza, Sivuyile Khaula, Smanga Mkhwanazi, Jenevieve Mannell, Laura Washington
{"title":"Zethembe:一个共同开发的夫妇干预在南非非正式定居点的年轻异性恋夫妇。","authors":"Andrew Gibbs, Zama Khoza, Sivuyile Khaula, Smanga Mkhwanazi, Jenevieve Mannell, Laura Washington","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective interventions to address violence against women and girls in urban informal settlements are limited. To address this gap, we undertook an intervention co-development process, bringing together four young women (aged 18-25 years) living in an urban informal settlement, academics and NGO partners. Following the 6 Steps in Quality Intervention Development (6SQuID) approach we collaboratively worked through the steps using participatory methods, supporting the young women to think critically and interrogate their lived reality, identify the causes of violence in their lives, and where they felt change was possible. We co-created Zethembe Couples Care, and 'pre-tested' this with 17 participants (some were couples). Finally, the academics and practitioners revised the intervention and theory of change. The co-development process led to a series of learnings: the process of building trust and supporting young women to reflect and understand their lived realities took a long time (12 of 15 months), limiting intervention development time. The process also enabled young women to push back against received academic/practitioner wisdom, leading to a couples intervention focused on addressing communication and problem solving, where they felt change was possible, but potentially they could not adequately consider addressing structural drivers of violence. The Zethembe Couples Care intervention now requires piloting at a larger scale to develop it further and formally evaluate it.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0004332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zethembe: a co-developed couples intervention for young heterosexual couples in informal settlements in South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Gibbs, Zama Khoza, Sivuyile Khaula, Smanga Mkhwanazi, Jenevieve Mannell, Laura Washington\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective interventions to address violence against women and girls in urban informal settlements are limited. To address this gap, we undertook an intervention co-development process, bringing together four young women (aged 18-25 years) living in an urban informal settlement, academics and NGO partners. Following the 6 Steps in Quality Intervention Development (6SQuID) approach we collaboratively worked through the steps using participatory methods, supporting the young women to think critically and interrogate their lived reality, identify the causes of violence in their lives, and where they felt change was possible. We co-created Zethembe Couples Care, and 'pre-tested' this with 17 participants (some were couples). Finally, the academics and practitioners revised the intervention and theory of change. The co-development process led to a series of learnings: the process of building trust and supporting young women to reflect and understand their lived realities took a long time (12 of 15 months), limiting intervention development time. The process also enabled young women to push back against received academic/practitioner wisdom, leading to a couples intervention focused on addressing communication and problem solving, where they felt change was possible, but potentially they could not adequately consider addressing structural drivers of violence. The Zethembe Couples Care intervention now requires piloting at a larger scale to develop it further and formally evaluate it.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"e0004332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
解决城市非正规住区中暴力侵害妇女和女童行为的有效干预措施有限。为了解决这一差距,我们开展了一项干预共同发展进程,将四名生活在城市非正式定居点的年轻女性(18-25岁)、学者和非政府组织合作伙伴聚集在一起。我们遵循“高质量干预发展六步骤”(6 Steps in Quality Intervention Development,简称6SQuID)的方法,透过参与式的方法,协助年轻女性进行批判性思考,质问她们的现实生活,找出她们生活中暴力的原因,以及她们认为有可能改变的地方。我们共同创建了Zethembe夫妻护理,并对17名参与者(其中一些是夫妻)进行了“预测试”。最后,学术界和实践者对干预和变革理论进行了修正。共同发展的过程带来了一系列的教训:建立信任和支持年轻女性反思和理解她们的生活现实的过程需要很长时间(15个月中的12个月),限制了干预发展的时间。这一过程还使年轻妇女能够抵制公认的学术/实践智慧,导致夫妻干预的重点是解决沟通和解决问题,她们认为有可能发生变化,但可能无法充分考虑解决暴力的结构性驱动因素。Zethembe夫妇护理干预现在需要进行更大规模的试点,以进一步发展和正式评估。
Zethembe: a co-developed couples intervention for young heterosexual couples in informal settlements in South Africa.
Effective interventions to address violence against women and girls in urban informal settlements are limited. To address this gap, we undertook an intervention co-development process, bringing together four young women (aged 18-25 years) living in an urban informal settlement, academics and NGO partners. Following the 6 Steps in Quality Intervention Development (6SQuID) approach we collaboratively worked through the steps using participatory methods, supporting the young women to think critically and interrogate their lived reality, identify the causes of violence in their lives, and where they felt change was possible. We co-created Zethembe Couples Care, and 'pre-tested' this with 17 participants (some were couples). Finally, the academics and practitioners revised the intervention and theory of change. The co-development process led to a series of learnings: the process of building trust and supporting young women to reflect and understand their lived realities took a long time (12 of 15 months), limiting intervention development time. The process also enabled young women to push back against received academic/practitioner wisdom, leading to a couples intervention focused on addressing communication and problem solving, where they felt change was possible, but potentially they could not adequately consider addressing structural drivers of violence. The Zethembe Couples Care intervention now requires piloting at a larger scale to develop it further and formally evaluate it.