亚塞拜然-土耳其人嗓音疲劳指数的跨文化适应与验证。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Zeinab Fathipour-Azar, Jafar Masumi, Fatemeh Fekar Gharamaleki, Boshra Bahrami
{"title":"亚塞拜然-土耳其人嗓音疲劳指数的跨文化适应与验证。","authors":"Zeinab Fathipour-Azar, Jafar Masumi, Fatemeh Fekar Gharamaleki, Boshra Bahrami","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is no Azerbaijani-Turkish scale for assessing vocal fatigue. This study aimed to adapt the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) to Azerbaijani-Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability through cross-cultural adaptation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional and prospective validation design was adopted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The VFI was translated and culturally adapted into the Azerbaijani-Turkish language according to the standard methodology of forward-backward translation. The study included 140 participants, with 70 having voice complaints and 70 not having voice complaints. Content validity was conducted with five experts through content validity index. Face validity and the pilot study were performed with 20 voice patients through cognitive interviewing. Construct validity was obtained by comparing the subtotal scores with and without vocal complaint groups. The criterion validity was calculated by comparing the correlation of the total score of the Azerbaijani-Turkish version of VFI (AT-VFI) with the Azerbaijani-Turkish version of the voice-related quality of life (AT-VRQOL) results. The discriminant validity was conducted by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff points. The internal consistency of AT-VFI was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. To calculate the test-retest reliability coefficient, the AT-VFI was completed twice by 30 participants, including 20 with vocal complaint disorders and 10 without vocal complaints, at intervals of 2 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in the AT-VFI scores between participants with and without voice complaints were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The construct validity results showed significant differences in the scores between the two groups in factors 1 and 2 scores (P < 0.001). The criterion validity results showed that the total score of AT-VFI with the AT-VRQOL results is correlated (r = 0.88, P < 0.001). The AUC value from the receiver operating characteristic curve was 100. The optimal cutoff point was 25.5, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100%. The AT-VFI had high internal consistency, indicating excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.98). The total AT-VFI scores obtained from the two administrations of the test-retest reliability were examined. It was found that there was a high degree of correlation between the scores obtained in the two administrations (r = 0.98, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AT-VFI is a valid, reliable, and sensitive index that can assess patients with vocal fatigue in the Azerbaijani-Turkish population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Vocal Fatigue Index to the Azerbaijani-Turkish.\",\"authors\":\"Zeinab Fathipour-Azar, Jafar Masumi, Fatemeh Fekar Gharamaleki, Boshra Bahrami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is no Azerbaijani-Turkish scale for assessing vocal fatigue. This study aimed to adapt the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) to Azerbaijani-Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability through cross-cultural adaptation.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional and prospective validation design was adopted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The VFI was translated and culturally adapted into the Azerbaijani-Turkish language according to the standard methodology of forward-backward translation. The study included 140 participants, with 70 having voice complaints and 70 not having voice complaints. Content validity was conducted with five experts through content validity index. Face validity and the pilot study were performed with 20 voice patients through cognitive interviewing. Construct validity was obtained by comparing the subtotal scores with and without vocal complaint groups. The criterion validity was calculated by comparing the correlation of the total score of the Azerbaijani-Turkish version of VFI (AT-VFI) with the Azerbaijani-Turkish version of the voice-related quality of life (AT-VRQOL) results. The discriminant validity was conducted by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff points. The internal consistency of AT-VFI was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. To calculate the test-retest reliability coefficient, the AT-VFI was completed twice by 30 participants, including 20 with vocal complaint disorders and 10 without vocal complaints, at intervals of 2 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in the AT-VFI scores between participants with and without voice complaints were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The construct validity results showed significant differences in the scores between the two groups in factors 1 and 2 scores (P < 0.001). The criterion validity results showed that the total score of AT-VFI with the AT-VRQOL results is correlated (r = 0.88, P < 0.001). The AUC value from the receiver operating characteristic curve was 100. The optimal cutoff point was 25.5, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100%. The AT-VFI had high internal consistency, indicating excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.98). The total AT-VFI scores obtained from the two administrations of the test-retest reliability were examined. It was found that there was a high degree of correlation between the scores obtained in the two administrations (r = 0.98, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AT-VFI is a valid, reliable, and sensitive index that can assess patients with vocal fatigue in the Azerbaijani-Turkish population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前尚无阿塞拜疆-土耳其语评估声乐疲劳的量表。本研究旨在将嗓音疲劳指数(VFI)改编为阿塞拜疆-土耳其语,并通过跨文化改编评估其有效性和可靠性:研究设计:采用横断面和前瞻性验证设计:研究设计:采用横断面和前瞻性验证设计。方法:根据标准的前向-后向翻译方法,将 VFI 翻译成阿塞拜疆-土耳其语并进行文化适应性调整。研究包括 140 名参与者,其中 70 人有嗓音不适,70 人无嗓音不适。五位专家通过内容效度指数进行了内容效度验证。通过认知访谈对 20 名嗓音患者进行了面效和试点研究。通过比较有嗓音投诉组和无嗓音投诉组的小总分,获得了结构效度。标准效度通过比较阿塞拜疆-土耳其版 VFI(AT-VFI)总分与阿塞拜疆-土耳其版嗓音相关生活质量(AT-VRQOL)结果的相关性来计算。通过评估曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性和临界点来进行判别效度。AT-VFI 的内部一致性采用 Cronbach's alpha 系数进行检验。为了计算测试-重复可靠性系数,30 名参与者(包括 20 名声带疾病患者和 10 名无声带疾病患者)两次完成 AT-VFI 的测试,每次间隔 2 周:结果:有嗓音不适和无嗓音不适者的 AT-VFI 分数差异有统计学意义(P 结论:AT-VFI 是一个有效的嗓音测试工具:AT-VFI 是一种有效、可靠且灵敏的指数,可用于评估阿塞拜疆-土耳其人群中的嗓音疲劳患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Vocal Fatigue Index to the Azerbaijani-Turkish.

Objectives: There is no Azerbaijani-Turkish scale for assessing vocal fatigue. This study aimed to adapt the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) to Azerbaijani-Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability through cross-cultural adaptation.

Study design: A cross-sectional and prospective validation design was adopted.

Methods: The VFI was translated and culturally adapted into the Azerbaijani-Turkish language according to the standard methodology of forward-backward translation. The study included 140 participants, with 70 having voice complaints and 70 not having voice complaints. Content validity was conducted with five experts through content validity index. Face validity and the pilot study were performed with 20 voice patients through cognitive interviewing. Construct validity was obtained by comparing the subtotal scores with and without vocal complaint groups. The criterion validity was calculated by comparing the correlation of the total score of the Azerbaijani-Turkish version of VFI (AT-VFI) with the Azerbaijani-Turkish version of the voice-related quality of life (AT-VRQOL) results. The discriminant validity was conducted by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff points. The internal consistency of AT-VFI was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. To calculate the test-retest reliability coefficient, the AT-VFI was completed twice by 30 participants, including 20 with vocal complaint disorders and 10 without vocal complaints, at intervals of 2 weeks.

Results: Differences in the AT-VFI scores between participants with and without voice complaints were statistically significant (P < 0.001). The construct validity results showed significant differences in the scores between the two groups in factors 1 and 2 scores (P < 0.001). The criterion validity results showed that the total score of AT-VFI with the AT-VRQOL results is correlated (r = 0.88, P < 0.001). The AUC value from the receiver operating characteristic curve was 100. The optimal cutoff point was 25.5, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100%. The AT-VFI had high internal consistency, indicating excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.98). The total AT-VFI scores obtained from the two administrations of the test-retest reliability were examined. It was found that there was a high degree of correlation between the scores obtained in the two administrations (r = 0.98, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The AT-VFI is a valid, reliable, and sensitive index that can assess patients with vocal fatigue in the Azerbaijani-Turkish population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信