公共场所自杀的趋势和危险因素:澳大利亚17年的病例对照研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Sangsoo Shin, Matthew J Spittal, Angela Clapperton, Jane Pirkis, Lay San Too
{"title":"公共场所自杀的趋势和危险因素:澳大利亚17年的病例对照研究。","authors":"Sangsoo Shin, Matthew J Spittal, Angela Clapperton, Jane Pirkis, Lay San Too","doi":"10.1111/sltb.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine factors associated with the choice of public location over home to die by suicide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a case-control design. Data on suicides that occurred between 2001 and 2017 in Australia were extracted from the National Coronial Information System. Cases were suicides that occurred in public places and controls were suicides that occurred at home. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between suicide location and several sociodemographic variables, depending on whether hotel rooms were included in or excluded from public places.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 25.2% of 42,656 suicides occurred in public places including hotel rooms, 69.3% at home, and 5.4% in nonpublic places other than at home (e.g., inpatient ward or correctional facilities). Excluding suicides in hotel rooms from public places, 1.6% points of suicides in public places moved to nonpublic places other than at home. In multivariable regression models regardless of scenarios, males (compared with females) had higher odds of dying by suicide in public places, while those who were divorced/separated/widowed (compared with married people), those who were older (aged 30-54, and aged 55 and above, compared with under 30 years), and those who were unemployed or not in the labor force (compared with employed people) had lower odds of suicide in public places.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings should be used to inform the design of strategies to prevent suicides in public places.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":"55 2","pages":"e70017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in, and Risk Factors for, Suicide in Public Places: A 17-Year Case-Control Study in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Sangsoo Shin, Matthew J Spittal, Angela Clapperton, Jane Pirkis, Lay San Too\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sltb.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine factors associated with the choice of public location over home to die by suicide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a case-control design. Data on suicides that occurred between 2001 and 2017 in Australia were extracted from the National Coronial Information System. Cases were suicides that occurred in public places and controls were suicides that occurred at home. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between suicide location and several sociodemographic variables, depending on whether hotel rooms were included in or excluded from public places.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 25.2% of 42,656 suicides occurred in public places including hotel rooms, 69.3% at home, and 5.4% in nonpublic places other than at home (e.g., inpatient ward or correctional facilities). Excluding suicides in hotel rooms from public places, 1.6% points of suicides in public places moved to nonpublic places other than at home. In multivariable regression models regardless of scenarios, males (compared with females) had higher odds of dying by suicide in public places, while those who were divorced/separated/widowed (compared with married people), those who were older (aged 30-54, and aged 55 and above, compared with under 30 years), and those who were unemployed or not in the labor force (compared with employed people) had lower odds of suicide in public places.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings should be used to inform the design of strategies to prevent suicides in public places.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"e70017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨选择公共场所而非家中自杀的相关因素。方法:本研究采用病例-对照设计。澳大利亚2001年至2017年发生的自杀事件的数据来自国家冠状信息系统。病例是发生在公共场所的自杀,对照组是发生在家中的自杀。使用逻辑回归模型来估计自杀地点与几个社会人口变量之间的关联,这取决于酒店房间是否包含在公共场所中。结果:42,656例自杀事件中,25.2%发生在酒店房间等公共场所,69.3%发生在家中,5.4%发生在非公共场所(如住院病房或教养设施)。不包括在酒店房间自杀的公共场所,在公共场所自杀的人中有1.6%的人转移到家中以外的非公共场所。在不考虑情景的多变量回归模型中,男性(与女性相比)在公共场所自杀身亡的几率更高,而离婚/分居/丧偶(与已婚人士相比)、年龄较大(30-54岁,55岁及以上,与30岁以下)、失业或非劳动力(与就业人员相比)在公共场所自杀身亡的几率较低。结论:研究结果可用于公共场所自杀预防策略的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in, and Risk Factors for, Suicide in Public Places: A 17-Year Case-Control Study in Australia.

Objective: To examine factors associated with the choice of public location over home to die by suicide.

Methods: This study used a case-control design. Data on suicides that occurred between 2001 and 2017 in Australia were extracted from the National Coronial Information System. Cases were suicides that occurred in public places and controls were suicides that occurred at home. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between suicide location and several sociodemographic variables, depending on whether hotel rooms were included in or excluded from public places.

Results: In total, 25.2% of 42,656 suicides occurred in public places including hotel rooms, 69.3% at home, and 5.4% in nonpublic places other than at home (e.g., inpatient ward or correctional facilities). Excluding suicides in hotel rooms from public places, 1.6% points of suicides in public places moved to nonpublic places other than at home. In multivariable regression models regardless of scenarios, males (compared with females) had higher odds of dying by suicide in public places, while those who were divorced/separated/widowed (compared with married people), those who were older (aged 30-54, and aged 55 and above, compared with under 30 years), and those who were unemployed or not in the labor force (compared with employed people) had lower odds of suicide in public places.

Conclusion: The findings should be used to inform the design of strategies to prevent suicides in public places.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信