{"title":"在尼日利亚社区一级传播卫生信息:审查共同做法和挑战。","authors":"Akogwu James Abah, Enyi Etiaba, Obinna Onwujekwe","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2025.2487380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communicating health information at the community level is a vital strategy in managing community health issues in Africa. This study examines the different practices of communicating health information towards improving community health in Nigeria, and how effective they have been. The social cognitive theory (SCT) provides the conceptual framework for the study.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A qualitative study was carried out in three states from three out of the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria. The states were Akwa Ibom State (South-south), Anambra State (South-east) and Kano State(North-west). The primary data for the study were collected from a diverse group of stakeholders cutting across community leaders, policy-makers, and informal and formal health providers, using ninety in-depth interviews and twelve Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Thematic analysis was used to explore the data.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Different practices of communicating health information in Nigeria include organizing meetings among community members, training community health workers, data/records management, community collaboration for health, use of educational institutions, and community advocacy. The study identified inadequate finance, shortage of manpower, lack of motivation and cultural beliefs as barriers to effective practices of communicating health information at the community level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are unsystematic and sub-optimal communications of health information at the community level, which can militate against such information and hinder the effective delivery of health programmes to communities. Hence, health communication and promotional interventions should align with the needs of the communities, encompassing their structural, cultural, social, religious and economic systems.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>LGAs: Local Governments Areas; CDC: Centre for Disease Control; FMOH: Federal Ministry of Health; IDIs: In-depth Interviews; CSOs: Civil Societies Organisations; FGDs: Focus Group Discussions; UNTH: University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital; CGW: Community Group for Women; R: Respondent; OIC: official-in-charge; WDC: Ward Development Chairman; TBAs: Traditional Birth Attendants; IHP: Informal Health Provider; HMIS: Health Management Information System; PMV: Patent Medicine Vendor; HIV: Human Immune Virus; NGOs: Non-governmental Organisation; CL: Community Leader; HRH: Human Resources for Health; PHC: Primary Health Care; USAID: United States Agency for International Development; WHO: World Health Organization; OO: Obinna Onwujekwe; EE: Enyi Etiaba; AJA: kogwu James Abah; HPRG: Health Policy Research Group.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating health information at the community level in Nigeria: examining common practices and challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Akogwu James Abah, Enyi Etiaba, Obinna Onwujekwe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538068.2025.2487380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communicating health information at the community level is a vital strategy in managing community health issues in Africa. This study examines the different practices of communicating health information towards improving community health in Nigeria, and how effective they have been. The social cognitive theory (SCT) provides the conceptual framework for the study.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A qualitative study was carried out in three states from three out of the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria. The states were Akwa Ibom State (South-south), Anambra State (South-east) and Kano State(North-west). The primary data for the study were collected from a diverse group of stakeholders cutting across community leaders, policy-makers, and informal and formal health providers, using ninety in-depth interviews and twelve Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Thematic analysis was used to explore the data.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Different practices of communicating health information in Nigeria include organizing meetings among community members, training community health workers, data/records management, community collaboration for health, use of educational institutions, and community advocacy. The study identified inadequate finance, shortage of manpower, lack of motivation and cultural beliefs as barriers to effective practices of communicating health information at the community level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are unsystematic and sub-optimal communications of health information at the community level, which can militate against such information and hinder the effective delivery of health programmes to communities. Hence, health communication and promotional interventions should align with the needs of the communities, encompassing their structural, cultural, social, religious and economic systems.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>LGAs: Local Governments Areas; CDC: Centre for Disease Control; FMOH: Federal Ministry of Health; IDIs: In-depth Interviews; CSOs: Civil Societies Organisations; FGDs: Focus Group Discussions; UNTH: University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital; CGW: Community Group for Women; R: Respondent; OIC: official-in-charge; WDC: Ward Development Chairman; TBAs: Traditional Birth Attendants; IHP: Informal Health Provider; HMIS: Health Management Information System; PMV: Patent Medicine Vendor; HIV: Human Immune Virus; NGOs: Non-governmental Organisation; CL: Community Leader; HRH: Human Resources for Health; PHC: Primary Health Care; USAID: United States Agency for International Development; WHO: World Health Organization; OO: Obinna Onwujekwe; EE: Enyi Etiaba; AJA: kogwu James Abah; HPRG: Health Policy Research Group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2025.2487380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2025.2487380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在社区层面传播健康信息是管理非洲社区健康问题的重要策略。本研究探讨了为改善尼日利亚社区健康而传播健康信息的不同做法,以及这些做法的效果如何。社会认知理论 (SCT) 为本研究提供了概念框架:在尼日利亚六个地缘政治区中的三个州开展了定性研究。这三个州分别是阿夸伊博姆州(南部)、阿南布拉州(东南部)和卡诺州(西北部)。研究的原始数据是通过 90 次深入访谈和 12 次焦点小组讨论 (FGD) 从社区领袖、政策制定者、非正规和正规医疗服务提供者等不同利益相关者那里收集的。对数据进行了专题分析:在尼日利亚,传播卫生信息的不同做法包括组织社区成员会议、培训社区卫生工作者、数据/记录管理、社区卫生合作、利用教育机构和社区宣传。研究发现,资金不足、人力短缺、缺乏动力和文化信仰是在社区一级有效传播卫生信息的障碍:结论:社区一级的健康信息传播缺乏系统性,也不够理想,这可能会影响这些信息的传播,阻碍向社区有效提供健康计划。因此,健康传播和宣传干预措施应符合社区的需求,包括其结构、文化、社会、宗教和经济体系:缩写:LGAs:疾病控制中心缩写:LGAs:地方政府区域;CDC:疾病控制中心;FMOH:联邦卫生部;IDIs:深入访谈;CSDS:民间社会组织:民间社会组织FGDs:R:受访者;OIC:负责官员;WDC:病房发展主席;TBAs:传统助产士;IHP:国际水文计划:HRH:卫生人力资源;PHC:初级卫生保健;USAID:美国国际开发署;WHO:世界卫生组织:美国国际开发署OO:OO:Obinna Onwujekwe;EE:Enyi Etiaba;AJA:kogwu James Abah;HPRG:Health Policy Research Group。
Communicating health information at the community level in Nigeria: examining common practices and challenges.
Background: Communicating health information at the community level is a vital strategy in managing community health issues in Africa. This study examines the different practices of communicating health information towards improving community health in Nigeria, and how effective they have been. The social cognitive theory (SCT) provides the conceptual framework for the study.
Methodology: A qualitative study was carried out in three states from three out of the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria. The states were Akwa Ibom State (South-south), Anambra State (South-east) and Kano State(North-west). The primary data for the study were collected from a diverse group of stakeholders cutting across community leaders, policy-makers, and informal and formal health providers, using ninety in-depth interviews and twelve Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Thematic analysis was used to explore the data.
Result: Different practices of communicating health information in Nigeria include organizing meetings among community members, training community health workers, data/records management, community collaboration for health, use of educational institutions, and community advocacy. The study identified inadequate finance, shortage of manpower, lack of motivation and cultural beliefs as barriers to effective practices of communicating health information at the community level.
Conclusion: There are unsystematic and sub-optimal communications of health information at the community level, which can militate against such information and hinder the effective delivery of health programmes to communities. Hence, health communication and promotional interventions should align with the needs of the communities, encompassing their structural, cultural, social, religious and economic systems.
Abbreviations: LGAs: Local Governments Areas; CDC: Centre for Disease Control; FMOH: Federal Ministry of Health; IDIs: In-depth Interviews; CSOs: Civil Societies Organisations; FGDs: Focus Group Discussions; UNTH: University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital; CGW: Community Group for Women; R: Respondent; OIC: official-in-charge; WDC: Ward Development Chairman; TBAs: Traditional Birth Attendants; IHP: Informal Health Provider; HMIS: Health Management Information System; PMV: Patent Medicine Vendor; HIV: Human Immune Virus; NGOs: Non-governmental Organisation; CL: Community Leader; HRH: Human Resources for Health; PHC: Primary Health Care; USAID: United States Agency for International Development; WHO: World Health Organization; OO: Obinna Onwujekwe; EE: Enyi Etiaba; AJA: kogwu James Abah; HPRG: Health Policy Research Group.