Chiho Lim, Marian Obuseh, Jackie Cha, James Steward, Chandru Sundaram, Denny Yu
{"title":"从神经角度洞察专家外科医生在实时机器人手术中的脑力劳动负荷。","authors":"Chiho Lim, Marian Obuseh, Jackie Cha, James Steward, Chandru Sundaram, Denny Yu","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-96064-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite its adoption and benefits, robotic surgeries can impose additional mental workload on surgeons. Validated questionnaires mostly administered at the end of procedures may not accurately capture the dynamic nature of mental workload over an entire procedure. Hence, we sought to determine if electroencephalogram (EEG) based neural activities in different brain regions can measure variations in expert surgeons' mental workload intraoperatively. EEG data was collected from five different surgeons performing 13 robotic-assisted urological procedures. Data analysis focused on three surgery phases (before, critical, and after). After performing each phase, surgeons provided a rating of their perceived mental workload. A linear mixed effects model was applied to explore the impact of the study phases on the relative spectral band power of EEG signals. The relative theta band power in the frontal brain region was highest during the critical portions of the procedure (p < 0.05). As the subjective ratings increased, the relative frontal theta band power increased (p < 0.001) while the relative parietal alpha band power decreased across all phases. We show that EEG signals can distinguish intraoperative workload in robotic surgeries. This has several applications including predicting risk factors for increased case complexity and surgical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"12073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural insights on expert surgeons' mental workload during live robotic surgeries.\",\"authors\":\"Chiho Lim, Marian Obuseh, Jackie Cha, James Steward, Chandru Sundaram, Denny Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-96064-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite its adoption and benefits, robotic surgeries can impose additional mental workload on surgeons. Validated questionnaires mostly administered at the end of procedures may not accurately capture the dynamic nature of mental workload over an entire procedure. Hence, we sought to determine if electroencephalogram (EEG) based neural activities in different brain regions can measure variations in expert surgeons' mental workload intraoperatively. EEG data was collected from five different surgeons performing 13 robotic-assisted urological procedures. Data analysis focused on three surgery phases (before, critical, and after). After performing each phase, surgeons provided a rating of their perceived mental workload. A linear mixed effects model was applied to explore the impact of the study phases on the relative spectral band power of EEG signals. The relative theta band power in the frontal brain region was highest during the critical portions of the procedure (p < 0.05). As the subjective ratings increased, the relative frontal theta band power increased (p < 0.001) while the relative parietal alpha band power decreased across all phases. We show that EEG signals can distinguish intraoperative workload in robotic surgeries. This has several applications including predicting risk factors for increased case complexity and surgical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"12073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96064-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96064-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neural insights on expert surgeons' mental workload during live robotic surgeries.
Despite its adoption and benefits, robotic surgeries can impose additional mental workload on surgeons. Validated questionnaires mostly administered at the end of procedures may not accurately capture the dynamic nature of mental workload over an entire procedure. Hence, we sought to determine if electroencephalogram (EEG) based neural activities in different brain regions can measure variations in expert surgeons' mental workload intraoperatively. EEG data was collected from five different surgeons performing 13 robotic-assisted urological procedures. Data analysis focused on three surgery phases (before, critical, and after). After performing each phase, surgeons provided a rating of their perceived mental workload. A linear mixed effects model was applied to explore the impact of the study phases on the relative spectral band power of EEG signals. The relative theta band power in the frontal brain region was highest during the critical portions of the procedure (p < 0.05). As the subjective ratings increased, the relative frontal theta band power increased (p < 0.001) while the relative parietal alpha band power decreased across all phases. We show that EEG signals can distinguish intraoperative workload in robotic surgeries. This has several applications including predicting risk factors for increased case complexity and surgical education.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.