Sarah Arulchelvam, Manshi Rana, Joshua John Jexy, Siyani Kugathasan, Sukham Sohal, Jocelyn Ye, Nicholas Young, Jasdeep Dhir
{"title":"本研究探讨了种族化学生在初级卫生专业教育课程中的观点和经验:一种范围审查方案。","authors":"Sarah Arulchelvam, Manshi Rana, Joshua John Jexy, Siyani Kugathasan, Sukham Sohal, Jocelyn Ye, Nicholas Young, Jasdeep Dhir","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to determine the breadth of literature exploring the perspectives and experiences of racialized students in entry-level health professional education programs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the implementation of equity, diversity, and inclusion policies and alternative admission criteria for minority students, racialized minorities continue to be underrepresented and have the highest attrition rate in health professional education programs. Furthermore, the students who eventually work in health care settings report experiences of microaggressions and prejudice. By not exploring the experiences of racialized students in health professional programs, equity, diversity, and inclusion policies and curricula risk becoming irrelevant or performative.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies exploring the perspectives and experiences of racism and discrimination, or related concepts, among non-dominant ethno-racial (eg, Indigenous, Black, South Asian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander), entry-level health professional students will be included. Experimental study designs as well as observational and qualitative studies will also be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Five databases will be searched, namely, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ERIC, and Global Health (Ovid), with no limitations on language or year. A gray literature search of relevant websites will also be conducted. Two reviewers will independently screen articles against the inclusion criteria and extract and summarize data. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/4bhg6.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 4","pages":"822-830"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The literature exploring the perspectives and experiences of racialized students in entry-level health professional education programs: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Arulchelvam, Manshi Rana, Joshua John Jexy, Siyani Kugathasan, Sukham Sohal, Jocelyn Ye, Nicholas Young, Jasdeep Dhir\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review is to determine the breadth of literature exploring the perspectives and experiences of racialized students in entry-level health professional education programs.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the implementation of equity, diversity, and inclusion policies and alternative admission criteria for minority students, racialized minorities continue to be underrepresented and have the highest attrition rate in health professional education programs. Furthermore, the students who eventually work in health care settings report experiences of microaggressions and prejudice. By not exploring the experiences of racialized students in health professional programs, equity, diversity, and inclusion policies and curricula risk becoming irrelevant or performative.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Studies exploring the perspectives and experiences of racism and discrimination, or related concepts, among non-dominant ethno-racial (eg, Indigenous, Black, South Asian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander), entry-level health professional students will be included. Experimental study designs as well as observational and qualitative studies will also be included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Five databases will be searched, namely, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ERIC, and Global Health (Ovid), with no limitations on language or year. A gray literature search of relevant websites will also be conducted. Two reviewers will independently screen articles against the inclusion criteria and extract and summarize data. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/4bhg6.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"822-830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本综述的目的是确定探讨初级卫生专业教育项目中种族化学生的观点和经验的文献的广度。导读:尽管实施了公平、多元化和包容政策以及针对少数族裔学生的另类录取标准,但种族化的少数族裔在卫生专业教育项目中的代表性仍然不足,并且流失率最高。此外,最终在卫生保健机构工作的学生报告了微侵犯和偏见的经历。由于没有探索卫生专业项目中种族化学生的经历,公平、多样性和包容性政策和课程有可能变得无关紧要或发挥作用。纳入标准:在非主导民族-种族(如土著、黑人、南亚、亚洲、西班牙裔、太平洋岛民)、初级卫生专业学生中探索种族主义和歧视或相关概念的观点和经验的研究将被纳入。实验研究设计以及观察和定性研究也将包括在内。方法:审查将按照JBI范围审查方法进行。检索五个数据库,即MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、ERIC和Global Health (Ovid),没有语言和年份限制。对相关网站进行灰色文献检索。两名审稿人将根据纳入标准独立筛选文章,并提取和总结数据。分歧将通过讨论或与第三方审稿人解决。评审注册:Open Science Framework https://osf.io/4bhg6。
The literature exploring the perspectives and experiences of racialized students in entry-level health professional education programs: a scoping review protocol.
Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to determine the breadth of literature exploring the perspectives and experiences of racialized students in entry-level health professional education programs.
Introduction: Despite the implementation of equity, diversity, and inclusion policies and alternative admission criteria for minority students, racialized minorities continue to be underrepresented and have the highest attrition rate in health professional education programs. Furthermore, the students who eventually work in health care settings report experiences of microaggressions and prejudice. By not exploring the experiences of racialized students in health professional programs, equity, diversity, and inclusion policies and curricula risk becoming irrelevant or performative.
Inclusion criteria: Studies exploring the perspectives and experiences of racism and discrimination, or related concepts, among non-dominant ethno-racial (eg, Indigenous, Black, South Asian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander), entry-level health professional students will be included. Experimental study designs as well as observational and qualitative studies will also be included.
Methods: The review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Five databases will be searched, namely, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ERIC, and Global Health (Ovid), with no limitations on language or year. A gray literature search of relevant websites will also be conducted. Two reviewers will independently screen articles against the inclusion criteria and extract and summarize data. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer.
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/4bhg6.