{"title":"非洲残疾妇女的围产期护理经验:一项定性系统审查方案。","authors":"Dawit Gebeyehu Mekonen, Erna Snelgrove-Clarke, Danielle Macdonald, Catherine Donnelly, Eshetu Engeda","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will explore the perinatal care experiences of women living with disability in African countries.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In many African countries, most women with disability face stigma and discrimination. They are also at risk of unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases due to gender-based violence and sexual abuse. Qualitative studies on perinatal care experiences of women with disability in Africa indicate challenges such as social stereotypes, lack of access to health facilities, and insensitivity from health professionals. Synthesizing the qualitative findings about the perinatal care experiences of women with disability in Africa will provide insights into the needs of this population and identify gaps in health care practice.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>We will include all settings in which women with disability in Africa receive maternal health care services, such as hospitals, clinics, primary care, community health centers, and homes. We will consider studies published from 2008 onward that present qualitative data, including designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and feminist research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The following databases will be searched: Global Health, CINHAL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), Sabinet African Journals, and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost). Theses and dissertations will be searched through ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and meta-aggregation. Confidence in the findings will be assessed in accordance with the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023431799.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":"23 4","pages":"772-780"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perinatal care experiences of women living with disability in Africa: a qualitative systematic review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Dawit Gebeyehu Mekonen, Erna Snelgrove-Clarke, Danielle Macdonald, Catherine Donnelly, Eshetu Engeda\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-23-00513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review will explore the perinatal care experiences of women living with disability in African countries.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In many African countries, most women with disability face stigma and discrimination. They are also at risk of unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases due to gender-based violence and sexual abuse. Qualitative studies on perinatal care experiences of women with disability in Africa indicate challenges such as social stereotypes, lack of access to health facilities, and insensitivity from health professionals. Synthesizing the qualitative findings about the perinatal care experiences of women with disability in Africa will provide insights into the needs of this population and identify gaps in health care practice.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>We will include all settings in which women with disability in Africa receive maternal health care services, such as hospitals, clinics, primary care, community health centers, and homes. We will consider studies published from 2008 onward that present qualitative data, including designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and feminist research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The following databases will be searched: Global Health, CINHAL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), Sabinet African Journals, and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost). Theses and dissertations will be searched through ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and meta-aggregation. Confidence in the findings will be assessed in accordance with the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023431799.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"772-780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨非洲国家残疾妇女的围产期护理经验。在许多非洲国家,大多数残疾妇女面临耻辱和歧视。由于基于性别的暴力和性虐待,她们还面临意外怀孕和性传播疾病的风险。关于非洲残疾妇女围产期护理经验的定性研究表明,存在社会陈规定型观念、缺乏利用保健设施的机会以及保健专业人员不敏感等挑战。综合关于非洲残疾妇女围产期护理经验的定性调查结果,将有助于深入了解这一群体的需求,并查明保健实践中的差距。纳入标准:我们将纳入非洲残疾妇女接受孕产妇保健服务的所有环境,如医院、诊所、初级保健、社区保健中心和家庭。我们将考虑2008年以后发表的具有定性数据的研究,包括现象学、扎根理论、民族志、行动研究和女权主义研究等设计。方法:本综述将按照JBI方法对定性证据进行系统评价。将检索以下数据库:Global Health、CINHAL (EBSCOhost)、MEDLINE (Ovid)、Web of Science、Embase (Ovid)、Sabinet African Journals和PsycINFO (EBSCOhost)。论文和学位论文将通过ProQuest dissertation and thesis和谷歌Scholar进行检索。两名独立审稿人将进行研究选择、批判性评估、数据提取和meta汇总。调查结果的可信度将根据congal方法进行评估。审核注册:PROSPERO CRD42023431799。
Perinatal care experiences of women living with disability in Africa: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Objective: This review will explore the perinatal care experiences of women living with disability in African countries.
Introduction: In many African countries, most women with disability face stigma and discrimination. They are also at risk of unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases due to gender-based violence and sexual abuse. Qualitative studies on perinatal care experiences of women with disability in Africa indicate challenges such as social stereotypes, lack of access to health facilities, and insensitivity from health professionals. Synthesizing the qualitative findings about the perinatal care experiences of women with disability in Africa will provide insights into the needs of this population and identify gaps in health care practice.
Inclusion criteria: We will include all settings in which women with disability in Africa receive maternal health care services, such as hospitals, clinics, primary care, community health centers, and homes. We will consider studies published from 2008 onward that present qualitative data, including designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and feminist research.
Methods: The review will be conducted in line with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The following databases will be searched: Global Health, CINHAL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), Sabinet African Journals, and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost). Theses and dissertations will be searched through ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers will conduct study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and meta-aggregation. Confidence in the findings will be assessed in accordance with the ConQual approach.