Young Taeck Oh, Chiwon Ahn, Yeonkyung Park, Jae Hwan Kim
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对韩国院外心脏骤停中毒的影响回顾性观察研究","authors":"Young Taeck Oh, Chiwon Ahn, Yeonkyung Park, Jae Hwan Kim","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-87346-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has characteristics distinct from cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, with external factors such as patient intent and environmental influences playing crucial roles. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered societal and healthcare dynamics, potentially influencing poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest characteristics and survival in South Korea. Participants: Adult patients (aged ≥ 19 years) who experienced poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study utilized data from the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Surveillance Database from 2016 to 2022. Poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases were compared before and during the pandemic by analyzing patient demographics, poisoning agents, prehospital interventions, and outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of survival. During the pandemic, poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases involving alcohol, organic solvents, and unspecified drugs increased, while pesticide-related cases declined. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates rose, yet survival rates fell (adjusted OR 0.59, CI 0.44-0.80). Prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and witnessed arrests remained the strongest predictors of survival (adjusted OR 13.93 and 4.09, respectively). The COVID-19 pandemic initially impacted poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes, particularly during its early stages, while later outcomes showed resilience in the emergency medical system. These findings highlight the importance of adaptable public health strategies to address vulnerabilities during large-scale crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11959"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on poisoning induced out of hospital cardiac arrest in South Korea retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Young Taeck Oh, Chiwon Ahn, Yeonkyung Park, Jae Hwan Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-87346-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has characteristics distinct from cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, with external factors such as patient intent and environmental influences playing crucial roles. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered societal and healthcare dynamics, potentially influencing poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest characteristics and survival in South Korea. Participants: Adult patients (aged ≥ 19 years) who experienced poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study utilized data from the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Surveillance Database from 2016 to 2022. Poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases were compared before and during the pandemic by analyzing patient demographics, poisoning agents, prehospital interventions, and outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of survival. During the pandemic, poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases involving alcohol, organic solvents, and unspecified drugs increased, while pesticide-related cases declined. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates rose, yet survival rates fell (adjusted OR 0.59, CI 0.44-0.80). Prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and witnessed arrests remained the strongest predictors of survival (adjusted OR 13.93 and 4.09, respectively). The COVID-19 pandemic initially impacted poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes, particularly during its early stages, while later outcomes showed resilience in the emergency medical system. These findings highlight the importance of adaptable public health strategies to address vulnerabilities during large-scale crises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"11959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87346-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87346-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
中毒诱发的院外心脏骤停具有不同于心源性院外心脏骤停的特点,患者意图和环境影响等外部因素起着至关重要的作用。2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行改变了社会和医疗动态,可能会影响中毒诱发的院外心脏骤停结果。本研究旨在评估大流行对韩国中毒引起的院外心脏骤停特征和存活率的影响。研究对象在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间经历过中毒引起的院外心脏骤停的成年患者(年龄≥ 19 岁)。本研究利用了 2016 年至 2022 年院外心脏骤停监测数据库中的数据。通过分析患者人口统计学特征、中毒药剂、院前干预措施和结果,对大流行之前和期间中毒引起的院外心脏骤停病例进行了比较。多变量逻辑回归确定了存活率的预测因素。在大流行期间,涉及酒精、有机溶剂和不明药物的中毒引起的院外心脏骤停病例有所增加,而与杀虫剂有关的病例有所减少。旁观者心肺复苏率上升,但存活率下降(调整 OR 0.59,CI 0.44-0.80)。院前自主循环恢复和目击者心跳骤停仍然是预测存活率的最有力指标(调整后 OR 分别为 13.93 和 4.09)。COVID-19大流行最初影响了中毒引起的院外心脏骤停结果,尤其是在其早期阶段,而后来的结果则显示了急救医疗系统的恢复能力。这些发现凸显了在大规模危机期间采取适应性强的公共卫生策略来应对脆弱性的重要性。
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on poisoning induced out of hospital cardiac arrest in South Korea retrospective observational study.
Poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has characteristics distinct from cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, with external factors such as patient intent and environmental influences playing crucial roles. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered societal and healthcare dynamics, potentially influencing poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest characteristics and survival in South Korea. Participants: Adult patients (aged ≥ 19 years) who experienced poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study utilized data from the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Surveillance Database from 2016 to 2022. Poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases were compared before and during the pandemic by analyzing patient demographics, poisoning agents, prehospital interventions, and outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of survival. During the pandemic, poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases involving alcohol, organic solvents, and unspecified drugs increased, while pesticide-related cases declined. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates rose, yet survival rates fell (adjusted OR 0.59, CI 0.44-0.80). Prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and witnessed arrests remained the strongest predictors of survival (adjusted OR 13.93 and 4.09, respectively). The COVID-19 pandemic initially impacted poisoning-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes, particularly during its early stages, while later outcomes showed resilience in the emergency medical system. These findings highlight the importance of adaptable public health strategies to address vulnerabilities during large-scale crises.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.