结合TAM和TTF模型,探讨了影响机电工程中仿真软件使用延续意愿的因素。

IF 3.8 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jiaxing Li, Wenhong Liang
{"title":"结合TAM和TTF模型,探讨了影响机电工程中仿真软件使用延续意愿的因素。","authors":"Jiaxing Li, Wenhong Liang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-90585-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to investigate the factors influencing students' continuance intention to use simulation software in mechatronic engineering education by integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. This study distributed questionnaires and collected data through the WJX platform. The questionnaire incorporated established and validated scales to measure key constructs, including perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, task‒technology fit, student satisfaction, and continuance intention. The participants were 351 mechatronics engineering students (including undergraduates, postgraduates, and doctoral students) from universities in Shaanxi Province, China, who had some experience using simulation software. The data were analysed via structural equation modelling (SEM) to ensure that the sample size matched the number of model variables. The results indicated that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and task‒technology fit positively affected students' satisfaction with the simulation software. Task‒technology fit and satisfaction have a positive effect on the students' continuance intention to use the simulation software. Notably, the effects of task‒technology fit and satisfaction on students' willingness to persist in using the simulation software are approximately similar. In addition, task‒technology fit not only directly influenced the willingness to persist in using simulation software in mechatronics learning but also indirectly affected these intentions through students' satisfaction with the simulation software. These findings provide valuable insights into the design and implementation of simulation software in mechatronics engineering education, emphasizing the importance of aligning software functions with students' learning tasks and goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"12046"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the factors influencing continuance intention to use simulation software in mechatronic engineering by integrating the TAM and TTF model.\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxing Li, Wenhong Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-90585-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aims to investigate the factors influencing students' continuance intention to use simulation software in mechatronic engineering education by integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. This study distributed questionnaires and collected data through the WJX platform. The questionnaire incorporated established and validated scales to measure key constructs, including perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, task‒technology fit, student satisfaction, and continuance intention. The participants were 351 mechatronics engineering students (including undergraduates, postgraduates, and doctoral students) from universities in Shaanxi Province, China, who had some experience using simulation software. The data were analysed via structural equation modelling (SEM) to ensure that the sample size matched the number of model variables. The results indicated that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and task‒technology fit positively affected students' satisfaction with the simulation software. Task‒technology fit and satisfaction have a positive effect on the students' continuance intention to use the simulation software. Notably, the effects of task‒technology fit and satisfaction on students' willingness to persist in using the simulation software are approximately similar. In addition, task‒technology fit not only directly influenced the willingness to persist in using simulation software in mechatronics learning but also indirectly affected these intentions through students' satisfaction with the simulation software. These findings provide valuable insights into the design and implementation of simulation software in mechatronics engineering education, emphasizing the importance of aligning software functions with students' learning tasks and goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"12046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90585-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90585-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在整合技术接受模型(TAM)和任务技术契合模型(TTF),探讨影响学生在机电工程教育中继续使用仿真软件意愿的因素。本研究通过WJX平台进行问卷调查和数据收集。问卷采用已建立和验证的量表来测量关键结构,包括感知易用性,感知有用性,任务-技术契合度,学生满意度和继续意向。参与者是来自中国陕西省高校的351名机电工程专业的学生(包括本科生、研究生和博士生),他们都有一定的使用仿真软件的经验。通过结构方程建模(SEM)对数据进行分析,以确保样本量与模型变量的数量相匹配。结果表明,感知易用性、感知有用性和任务技术契合度正向影响学生对模拟软件的满意度。任务技术契合度和满意度对学生继续使用仿真软件的意愿有正向影响。值得注意的是,任务-技术契合度和满意度对学生坚持使用模拟软件的意愿的影响大致相似。此外,任务-技术契合度不仅直接影响了学生在机电一体化学习中坚持使用仿真软件的意愿,还通过学生对仿真软件的满意度间接影响了这些意愿。这些发现为机电工程教育中仿真软件的设计和实现提供了有价值的见解,强调了将软件功能与学生的学习任务和目标相结合的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the factors influencing continuance intention to use simulation software in mechatronic engineering by integrating the TAM and TTF model.

This study aims to investigate the factors influencing students' continuance intention to use simulation software in mechatronic engineering education by integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. This study distributed questionnaires and collected data through the WJX platform. The questionnaire incorporated established and validated scales to measure key constructs, including perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, task‒technology fit, student satisfaction, and continuance intention. The participants were 351 mechatronics engineering students (including undergraduates, postgraduates, and doctoral students) from universities in Shaanxi Province, China, who had some experience using simulation software. The data were analysed via structural equation modelling (SEM) to ensure that the sample size matched the number of model variables. The results indicated that perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and task‒technology fit positively affected students' satisfaction with the simulation software. Task‒technology fit and satisfaction have a positive effect on the students' continuance intention to use the simulation software. Notably, the effects of task‒technology fit and satisfaction on students' willingness to persist in using the simulation software are approximately similar. In addition, task‒technology fit not only directly influenced the willingness to persist in using simulation software in mechatronics learning but also indirectly affected these intentions through students' satisfaction with the simulation software. These findings provide valuable insights into the design and implementation of simulation software in mechatronics engineering education, emphasizing the importance of aligning software functions with students' learning tasks and goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信