比利时未控制的严重慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的生物治疗效果:一项多中心真实世界数据研究。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.4193/Rhin24.509
A-S Viskens, L Bollens, E Borgers, S Halewyck, V Hox, M Jorissen, W Lemmens, F Rogister, K Speleman, L Van Gerven, O Vanderveken, B Verhaeghe, A Vroegop, K Martens, P W Hellings
{"title":"比利时未控制的严重慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的生物治疗效果:一项多中心真实世界数据研究。","authors":"A-S Viskens, L Bollens, E Borgers, S Halewyck, V Hox, M Jorissen, W Lemmens, F Rogister, K Speleman, L Van Gerven, O Vanderveken, B Verhaeghe, A Vroegop, K Martens, P W Hellings","doi":"10.4193/Rhin24.509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Double-blinded placebo-controlled trials have revealed the efficacy of mepolizumab and omalizumab in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, real-world efficacy (RWE) data, data on therapeutic response and level of disease control for both biologicals are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>167 patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP, meeting national reimbursement criteria, were included with follow-up over 24 weeks. Primary outcomes included changes in nasal congestion (NCS), nasal polyp score (NPS), VAS-scores, SNOT-22, ACQ-5, and AQLQ scores. Secondary outcomes were therapeutic response and disease control according to EUFOREA/EPOS criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 167 CRSwNP patients, 144 received mepolizumab and 23 omalizumab. After 24 weeks, Patient reported outcomes and NPS significantly improved for both biologicals, with significant effects seen at 12 weeks, with further reduction in NPS by 24 weeks in mepolizumab patients. 74% of patients on omalizumab and 81% of patients on mepolizumab continued their therapy beyond 24 weeks, with 47% and 45% of patients on omalizumab and mepolizumab respectively showing an excellent therapeutic response, with only one out of seven having no/poor response. Disease control was reached in one third of the patients at 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both mepolizumab and omalizumab significantly improved patient-reported outcomes after 24-weeks, with major effects already observed at 12 weeks. Follow-up beyond 24-weeks might reveal additional effects on both control and remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of biological treatment in uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Belgium: a multicentre real-world data study.\",\"authors\":\"A-S Viskens, L Bollens, E Borgers, S Halewyck, V Hox, M Jorissen, W Lemmens, F Rogister, K Speleman, L Van Gerven, O Vanderveken, B Verhaeghe, A Vroegop, K Martens, P W Hellings\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/Rhin24.509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Double-blinded placebo-controlled trials have revealed the efficacy of mepolizumab and omalizumab in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, real-world efficacy (RWE) data, data on therapeutic response and level of disease control for both biologicals are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>167 patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP, meeting national reimbursement criteria, were included with follow-up over 24 weeks. Primary outcomes included changes in nasal congestion (NCS), nasal polyp score (NPS), VAS-scores, SNOT-22, ACQ-5, and AQLQ scores. Secondary outcomes were therapeutic response and disease control according to EUFOREA/EPOS criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 167 CRSwNP patients, 144 received mepolizumab and 23 omalizumab. After 24 weeks, Patient reported outcomes and NPS significantly improved for both biologicals, with significant effects seen at 12 weeks, with further reduction in NPS by 24 weeks in mepolizumab patients. 74% of patients on omalizumab and 81% of patients on mepolizumab continued their therapy beyond 24 weeks, with 47% and 45% of patients on omalizumab and mepolizumab respectively showing an excellent therapeutic response, with only one out of seven having no/poor response. Disease control was reached in one third of the patients at 24 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both mepolizumab and omalizumab significantly improved patient-reported outcomes after 24-weeks, with major effects already observed at 12 weeks. Follow-up beyond 24-weeks might reveal additional effects on both control and remission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.509\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:双盲安慰剂对照试验揭示了mepolizumab和omalizumab治疗慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的疗效。然而,缺乏这两种生物制剂的实际疗效(RWE)数据、治疗反应和疾病控制水平的数据。方法:167例未控制的严重CRSwNP患者,符合国家报销标准,随访超过24周。主要结局包括鼻塞(NCS)、鼻息肉评分(NPS)、vas评分、SNOT-22、ACQ-5和AQLQ评分的变化。次要结局是根据EUFOREA/EPOS标准的治疗反应和疾病控制。结果:167例CRSwNP患者中,144例接受了mepolizumab治疗,23例接受了omalizumab治疗。24周后,两种生物制剂的患者报告的结果和NPS显着改善,在12周时观察到显着效果,mepolizumab患者的NPS进一步降低了24周。74%的omalizumab患者和81%的mepolizumab患者持续治疗超过24周,分别有47%和45%的omalizumab和mepolizumab患者表现出良好的治疗反应,只有七分之一的患者没有或不良反应。在24周时,三分之一的患者达到了疾病控制。结论:mepolizumab和omalizumab在24周后显著改善了患者报告的结果,在12周时已经观察到主要效果。超过24周的随访可能会发现控制和缓解的额外效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of biological treatment in uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Belgium: a multicentre real-world data study.

Background: Double-blinded placebo-controlled trials have revealed the efficacy of mepolizumab and omalizumab in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, real-world efficacy (RWE) data, data on therapeutic response and level of disease control for both biologicals are lacking.

Methodology: 167 patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP, meeting national reimbursement criteria, were included with follow-up over 24 weeks. Primary outcomes included changes in nasal congestion (NCS), nasal polyp score (NPS), VAS-scores, SNOT-22, ACQ-5, and AQLQ scores. Secondary outcomes were therapeutic response and disease control according to EUFOREA/EPOS criteria.

Results: Of the 167 CRSwNP patients, 144 received mepolizumab and 23 omalizumab. After 24 weeks, Patient reported outcomes and NPS significantly improved for both biologicals, with significant effects seen at 12 weeks, with further reduction in NPS by 24 weeks in mepolizumab patients. 74% of patients on omalizumab and 81% of patients on mepolizumab continued their therapy beyond 24 weeks, with 47% and 45% of patients on omalizumab and mepolizumab respectively showing an excellent therapeutic response, with only one out of seven having no/poor response. Disease control was reached in one third of the patients at 24 weeks.

Conclusions: Both mepolizumab and omalizumab significantly improved patient-reported outcomes after 24-weeks, with major effects already observed at 12 weeks. Follow-up beyond 24-weeks might reveal additional effects on both control and remission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信