罗马尼亚版自闭症谱商(AQ)和共情商(EQ)在普通人群中的验证。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Alexandra Dolfi, Darian Faur, Mihai-Rare Scălcău, Emilia-Maria Sorescu, Mugur-Daniel Ciumăgeanu, Cătălina Tudose
{"title":"罗马尼亚版自闭症谱商(AQ)和共情商(EQ)在普通人群中的验证。","authors":"Alexandra Dolfi, Darian Faur, Mihai-Rare Scălcău, Emilia-Maria Sorescu, Mugur-Daniel Ciumăgeanu, Cătălina Tudose","doi":"10.1007/s11126-025-10144-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) can be difficult to achieve, especially since the diagnostic criteria have changed in the last decade. This challenge is even greater for Romanian clinicians, as there are currently no screening tools validated for diagnosing ASD in adults within the Romanian population.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to validate two screening instruments used to identify autistic traits in the Romanian general population: the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and the Empathy Quotient (EQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected by administering the Romanian version of the scales to a sample of 916 Romanian native speakers from the non-clinical population. 108 individuals were re-tested after 2 years. The scales were validated by determining their reliability with respect to the stability of the results and evaluating their construct and structural validity in correlation with the following instruments: QCAE (Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy), PAQ (Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire) and BVAQ (Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data revealed that, regarding reliability, the Romanian version of AQ presents slightly lower internal consistency compared to the original validation study. Concerning structural validity, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed suboptimal fit indices for the original 5-factor structure. Based on a subsequent exploratory factor analysis (EFA), a 2-factor solution returned improved fit indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite employing more items to measure the constructs than needed, this study confirmed that both instruments present a valuable resource for clinicians working with neurodivergent patients, as interest in this area of pathology has increased greatly in Romania over the past few years. Practical implications and methodological issues regarding the two instruments are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Romanian Version of Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and Empathy Quotient (EQ) in the General Population.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Dolfi, Darian Faur, Mihai-Rare Scălcău, Emilia-Maria Sorescu, Mugur-Daniel Ciumăgeanu, Cătălina Tudose\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11126-025-10144-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) can be difficult to achieve, especially since the diagnostic criteria have changed in the last decade. This challenge is even greater for Romanian clinicians, as there are currently no screening tools validated for diagnosing ASD in adults within the Romanian population.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to validate two screening instruments used to identify autistic traits in the Romanian general population: the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and the Empathy Quotient (EQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected by administering the Romanian version of the scales to a sample of 916 Romanian native speakers from the non-clinical population. 108 individuals were re-tested after 2 years. The scales were validated by determining their reliability with respect to the stability of the results and evaluating their construct and structural validity in correlation with the following instruments: QCAE (Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy), PAQ (Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire) and BVAQ (Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data revealed that, regarding reliability, the Romanian version of AQ presents slightly lower internal consistency compared to the original validation study. Concerning structural validity, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed suboptimal fit indices for the original 5-factor structure. Based on a subsequent exploratory factor analysis (EFA), a 2-factor solution returned improved fit indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite employing more items to measure the constructs than needed, this study confirmed that both instruments present a valuable resource for clinicians working with neurodivergent patients, as interest in this area of pathology has increased greatly in Romania over the past few years. Practical implications and methodological issues regarding the two instruments are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric Quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-025-10144-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-025-10144-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的诊断很难实现,特别是自从诊断标准在过去十年中发生了变化。对于罗马尼亚的临床医生来说,这一挑战甚至更大,因为目前还没有有效的筛查工具来诊断罗马尼亚人群中的成人ASD。目的:本研究旨在验证两种用于识别罗马尼亚普通人群自闭症特征的筛查工具:自闭症谱系商(AQ)和共情商(EQ)。方法:通过对916名母语为罗马尼亚语的非临床人群使用罗马尼亚版量表收集数据。108人在2年后重新测试。通过确定量表的信度、结果的稳定性以及与以下工具(QCAE(认知与情感共情问卷)、PAQ(珀斯述情问卷)和BVAQ(伯德-沃斯述情问卷)相关的结构效度来评估量表的有效性。结果:我们的数据显示,在信度方面,罗马尼亚版本的AQ与原始验证研究相比具有稍低的内部一致性。在结构效度方面,验证性因子分析(CFA)显示原五因子结构的拟合指标为次优。基于随后的探索性因子分析(EFA),一个双因子解决方案返回了改进的拟合指数。结论:尽管采用了比需要更多的项目来测量结构,但本研究证实,这两种仪器都为临床医生提供了宝贵的资源,用于治疗神经发散性患者,因为在过去几年中,罗马尼亚对这一病理领域的兴趣大大增加。讨论了这两种工具的实际含义和方法问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Romanian Version of Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and Empathy Quotient (EQ) in the General Population.

Introduction: The diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) can be difficult to achieve, especially since the diagnostic criteria have changed in the last decade. This challenge is even greater for Romanian clinicians, as there are currently no screening tools validated for diagnosing ASD in adults within the Romanian population.

Purpose: This study aims to validate two screening instruments used to identify autistic traits in the Romanian general population: the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and the Empathy Quotient (EQ).

Methods: Data was collected by administering the Romanian version of the scales to a sample of 916 Romanian native speakers from the non-clinical population. 108 individuals were re-tested after 2 years. The scales were validated by determining their reliability with respect to the stability of the results and evaluating their construct and structural validity in correlation with the following instruments: QCAE (Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy), PAQ (Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire) and BVAQ (Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire).

Results: Our data revealed that, regarding reliability, the Romanian version of AQ presents slightly lower internal consistency compared to the original validation study. Concerning structural validity, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed suboptimal fit indices for the original 5-factor structure. Based on a subsequent exploratory factor analysis (EFA), a 2-factor solution returned improved fit indices.

Conclusion: Despite employing more items to measure the constructs than needed, this study confirmed that both instruments present a valuable resource for clinicians working with neurodivergent patients, as interest in this area of pathology has increased greatly in Romania over the past few years. Practical implications and methodological issues regarding the two instruments are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信