{"title":"与多发性硬化症中鞘磷脂 1 磷酸盐受体调节剂 (S1PRMs) 相关的淋巴细胞减少症:欧洲药物警戒数据分析。","authors":"Nunzia Balzano, Raffaella Di Napoli, Federica Fraenza, Daniele Di Giulio Cesare, Ornella Moreggia, Mirko Cardillo, Cristina Scavone, Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco, Annalisa Capuano, Liberata Sportiello","doi":"10.1007/s43440-025-00725-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment landscape for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has increased significantly over the past few decades, thanks to the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod belong to the newer generation of oral DMTs categorized as sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs). Because of their mechanism of action, they may increase the risk of lymphopenia, which could influence the therapeutic management of people with MS. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the reporting frequency of lymphopenia related to four S1PRMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were retrieved from the European spontaneous reporting system database (EudraVigilance) from January 1st, 2022, to December 31st, 2023. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were computed to compare the reporting probability of lymphopenia between a S1PRM versus each other.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 4017 ICSRs, of which 521 (13%) reported lymphopenia associated with fingolimod (53.3%), siponimod (38.4%), ozanimod (5.4%), and ponesimod (2.1%). The most common reporting source was the healthcare professional (94.2%), and more than half of the ICSRs (62.6%) reported serious lymphopenia. Fingolimod was associated with a lower reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to siponimod. Both siponimod and fingolimod were associated with a higher reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to ozanimod; siponimod also had a higher reporting probability in comparison with ponesimod.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most relevant clinical implication of the disproportionality analysis is to increase the awareness of the risk of lymphopenia related to these drugs, thus supporting proactive monitoring and optimizing treatment strategies for people with MS.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19947,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymphopenia associated with sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) in multiple sclerosis: analysis of European pharmacovigilance data.\",\"authors\":\"Nunzia Balzano, Raffaella Di Napoli, Federica Fraenza, Daniele Di Giulio Cesare, Ornella Moreggia, Mirko Cardillo, Cristina Scavone, Giorgia Teresa Maniscalco, Annalisa Capuano, Liberata Sportiello\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43440-025-00725-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment landscape for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has increased significantly over the past few decades, thanks to the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod belong to the newer generation of oral DMTs categorized as sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs). Because of their mechanism of action, they may increase the risk of lymphopenia, which could influence the therapeutic management of people with MS. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the reporting frequency of lymphopenia related to four S1PRMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were retrieved from the European spontaneous reporting system database (EudraVigilance) from January 1st, 2022, to December 31st, 2023. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were computed to compare the reporting probability of lymphopenia between a S1PRM versus each other.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retrieved 4017 ICSRs, of which 521 (13%) reported lymphopenia associated with fingolimod (53.3%), siponimod (38.4%), ozanimod (5.4%), and ponesimod (2.1%). The most common reporting source was the healthcare professional (94.2%), and more than half of the ICSRs (62.6%) reported serious lymphopenia. Fingolimod was associated with a lower reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to siponimod. Both siponimod and fingolimod were associated with a higher reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to ozanimod; siponimod also had a higher reporting probability in comparison with ponesimod.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The most relevant clinical implication of the disproportionality analysis is to increase the awareness of the risk of lymphopenia related to these drugs, thus supporting proactive monitoring and optimizing treatment strategies for people with MS.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacological Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-025-00725-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-025-00725-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lymphopenia associated with sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) in multiple sclerosis: analysis of European pharmacovigilance data.
Background: The treatment landscape for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has increased significantly over the past few decades, thanks to the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod belong to the newer generation of oral DMTs categorized as sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs). Because of their mechanism of action, they may increase the risk of lymphopenia, which could influence the therapeutic management of people with MS. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the reporting frequency of lymphopenia related to four S1PRMs.
Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were retrieved from the European spontaneous reporting system database (EudraVigilance) from January 1st, 2022, to December 31st, 2023. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were computed to compare the reporting probability of lymphopenia between a S1PRM versus each other.
Results: We retrieved 4017 ICSRs, of which 521 (13%) reported lymphopenia associated with fingolimod (53.3%), siponimod (38.4%), ozanimod (5.4%), and ponesimod (2.1%). The most common reporting source was the healthcare professional (94.2%), and more than half of the ICSRs (62.6%) reported serious lymphopenia. Fingolimod was associated with a lower reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to siponimod. Both siponimod and fingolimod were associated with a higher reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to ozanimod; siponimod also had a higher reporting probability in comparison with ponesimod.
Conclusions: The most relevant clinical implication of the disproportionality analysis is to increase the awareness of the risk of lymphopenia related to these drugs, thus supporting proactive monitoring and optimizing treatment strategies for people with MS.
期刊介绍:
Pharmacological Reports publishes articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology, dealing with the action of drugs at a cellular and molecular level, and papers on the relationship between molecular structure and biological activity as well as reports on compounds with well-defined chemical structures.
Pharmacological Reports is an open forum to disseminate recent developments in: pharmacology, behavioural brain research, evidence-based complementary biochemical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry and biochemistry, drug discovery, neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry, neuroscience and neuropharmacology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, cell biology, toxicology.
Studies of plant extracts are not suitable for Pharmacological Reports.