团体和个人咨询干预对罗马尼亚工业雇员COVID-19疫苗接种意愿的影响

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S500640
Gheorghe Gindrovel Dumitra, Ancuța Ramona Camen, Florina Nechita, Mihail Cristian Pîrlog, Constantin Kamal, Carmen Adriana Dogaru, Mirela Radu, Elena Codruța Gheorghe, Elena Madalina Dumitrescu, Venera Cristina Dinescu, Roxana Surugiu, Carmen Nicoleta Oancea, Adina Turcu-Stiolica
{"title":"团体和个人咨询干预对罗马尼亚工业雇员COVID-19疫苗接种意愿的影响","authors":"Gheorghe Gindrovel Dumitra, Ancuța Ramona Camen, Florina Nechita, Mihail Cristian Pîrlog, Constantin Kamal, Carmen Adriana Dogaru, Mirela Radu, Elena Codruța Gheorghe, Elena Madalina Dumitrescu, Venera Cristina Dinescu, Roxana Surugiu, Carmen Nicoleta Oancea, Adina Turcu-Stiolica","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S500640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy remains a critical barrier to achieving widespread vaccination, particularly in settings with limited public trust and high exposure to misinformation. This study aims to measure the level of vaccine hesitancy, identifying the factors contributing to it, and to evaluate the effectiveness of two targeted interventions-group and individual counseling-designed to address vaccine hesitancy among employees in seven industrial companies in Romania during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 256 participants were included in the study, and interventions were delivered by family physicians and occupational medicine specialists trained in motivational interviewing (MI) techniques. Data on sociodemographic factors, vaccine hesitancy, and willingness to vaccinate were collected using a questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for vaccine willingness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both interventions led to significant increases in willingness to vaccinate, with group counseling showing a 1.4-point increase on the VAS (p-value < 0.0001) and individual counseling showing a 1.5-point increase (p-value < 0.0001), though the differences between the two approaches were not statistically significant (p-value = 0.209). Key factors correlated with higher levels of vaccine hesitancy included younger age, lower education levels, marital status (single or divorced), having children, the presence of chronic diseases, a lack of general antivaccine beliefs, and a lack of trust in the natural origin of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the effectiveness of dual interventions involving family doctors and occupational medicine specialists in reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among industrial workers in Romania. Key factors influencing hesitancy included demographic characteristics (age, marital status) and social determinants (education level, anti-vaccine beliefs, parenthood, and chronic illness). The findings emphasize the role of trusted healthcare professionals in addressing these concerns through targeted communication strategies, such as motivational interviewing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"907-919"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Group and Individual Counselling Interventions on COVID-19 Vaccination Intention Among Industrial Employees in Romania.\",\"authors\":\"Gheorghe Gindrovel Dumitra, Ancuța Ramona Camen, Florina Nechita, Mihail Cristian Pîrlog, Constantin Kamal, Carmen Adriana Dogaru, Mirela Radu, Elena Codruța Gheorghe, Elena Madalina Dumitrescu, Venera Cristina Dinescu, Roxana Surugiu, Carmen Nicoleta Oancea, Adina Turcu-Stiolica\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S500640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy remains a critical barrier to achieving widespread vaccination, particularly in settings with limited public trust and high exposure to misinformation. This study aims to measure the level of vaccine hesitancy, identifying the factors contributing to it, and to evaluate the effectiveness of two targeted interventions-group and individual counseling-designed to address vaccine hesitancy among employees in seven industrial companies in Romania during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 256 participants were included in the study, and interventions were delivered by family physicians and occupational medicine specialists trained in motivational interviewing (MI) techniques. Data on sociodemographic factors, vaccine hesitancy, and willingness to vaccinate were collected using a questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for vaccine willingness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both interventions led to significant increases in willingness to vaccinate, with group counseling showing a 1.4-point increase on the VAS (p-value < 0.0001) and individual counseling showing a 1.5-point increase (p-value < 0.0001), though the differences between the two approaches were not statistically significant (p-value = 0.209). Key factors correlated with higher levels of vaccine hesitancy included younger age, lower education levels, marital status (single or divorced), having children, the presence of chronic diseases, a lack of general antivaccine beliefs, and a lack of trust in the natural origin of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the effectiveness of dual interventions involving family doctors and occupational medicine specialists in reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among industrial workers in Romania. Key factors influencing hesitancy included demographic characteristics (age, marital status) and social determinants (education level, anti-vaccine beliefs, parenthood, and chronic illness). The findings emphasize the role of trusted healthcare professionals in addressing these concerns through targeted communication strategies, such as motivational interviewing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"907-919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S500640\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S500640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疫苗犹豫仍然是实现广泛接种的关键障碍,特别是在公众信任有限和高度暴露于错误信息的环境中。本研究旨在衡量疫苗犹豫的水平,确定导致疫苗犹豫的因素,并评估两种有针对性的干预措施——团体和个人咨询——的有效性,这些干预措施旨在解决罗马尼亚7家工业公司员工在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的疫苗犹豫问题。方法:共纳入256名参与者,干预措施由接受过动机访谈(MI)技术培训的家庭医生和职业医学专家提供。使用问卷调查和视觉模拟量表(VAS)收集有关社会人口因素、疫苗犹豫和疫苗接种意愿的数据。结果:两种干预措施均显著提高了接种疫苗的意愿,小组咨询的VAS评分提高了1.4分(p值< 0.0001),个人咨询的VAS评分提高了1.5分(p值< 0.0001),但两种方法之间的差异无统计学意义(p值= 0.209)。与疫苗犹豫程度较高相关的关键因素包括年龄较小、受教育程度较低、婚姻状况(单身或离婚)、有孩子、存在慢性疾病、缺乏普遍的反疫苗信念以及对新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的自然来源缺乏信任。结论:本研究强调了家庭医生和职业医学专家参与的双重干预措施在减少罗马尼亚产业工人COVID-19疫苗犹豫方面的有效性。影响犹豫的关键因素包括人口统计学特征(年龄、婚姻状况)和社会决定因素(教育水平、反疫苗信念、为人父母和慢性病)。研究结果强调了值得信赖的医疗保健专业人员在通过有针对性的沟通策略(如动机性访谈)解决这些问题方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Group and Individual Counselling Interventions on COVID-19 Vaccination Intention Among Industrial Employees in Romania.

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy remains a critical barrier to achieving widespread vaccination, particularly in settings with limited public trust and high exposure to misinformation. This study aims to measure the level of vaccine hesitancy, identifying the factors contributing to it, and to evaluate the effectiveness of two targeted interventions-group and individual counseling-designed to address vaccine hesitancy among employees in seven industrial companies in Romania during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemics.

Methods: A total of 256 participants were included in the study, and interventions were delivered by family physicians and occupational medicine specialists trained in motivational interviewing (MI) techniques. Data on sociodemographic factors, vaccine hesitancy, and willingness to vaccinate were collected using a questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for vaccine willingness.

Results: Both interventions led to significant increases in willingness to vaccinate, with group counseling showing a 1.4-point increase on the VAS (p-value < 0.0001) and individual counseling showing a 1.5-point increase (p-value < 0.0001), though the differences between the two approaches were not statistically significant (p-value = 0.209). Key factors correlated with higher levels of vaccine hesitancy included younger age, lower education levels, marital status (single or divorced), having children, the presence of chronic diseases, a lack of general antivaccine beliefs, and a lack of trust in the natural origin of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).

Conclusion: This study highlights the effectiveness of dual interventions involving family doctors and occupational medicine specialists in reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among industrial workers in Romania. Key factors influencing hesitancy included demographic characteristics (age, marital status) and social determinants (education level, anti-vaccine beliefs, parenthood, and chronic illness). The findings emphasize the role of trusted healthcare professionals in addressing these concerns through targeted communication strategies, such as motivational interviewing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信