沙特阿拉伯的多发性硬化症患者想知道他们的预后吗?一项全国性的横断面研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yaser M Al Malik, Awad S Alharbi, Mohammed A Alfurayh, Abdulaziz A Aldalaan, Abdulazeez M Alzailaie, Eid D Alanazi, Ahmad A Abulaban, Seraj O Makkawi, Asma A Alanazi
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯的多发性硬化症患者想知道他们的预后吗?一项全国性的横断面研究。","authors":"Yaser M Al Malik, Awad S Alharbi, Mohammed A Alfurayh, Abdulaziz A Aldalaan, Abdulazeez M Alzailaie, Eid D Alanazi, Ahmad A Abulaban, Seraj O Makkawi, Asma A Alanazi","doi":"10.17712/nsj.2025.2.20240094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether Persons with MS (pwMS) in Saudi Arabia want to discuss their long-term prognosis (LTP) and the factors influencing this decision using a self-administered online questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire was distributed from December 2022 to July 2023 across Saudi Arabia to determine pwMS interest in discussing their LTP. Participants included patients over 18 years, of any gender, diagnosed with MS. A nonprobability convenience sampling technique was used, with questionnaires sent through MS organizations and channels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost two-thirds (66-68%) of the 375 respondents reported that their LTP had never been discussed during neurologist appointments and expressed uncertainty about it. Additionally, 23.5% noted discrepancies in information provided by different neurologists. Most (81.6%) expressed a desire for a prognostic tool at diagnosis. In this study, MS patients' desire to learn about a tool for assessing long-term prognosis was significantly associated with age, education level (<i>p</i><0.001), and gender (<i>p</i>=0.02). A higher percentage of women (65.7%) showed interest in learning about the tool compared to men (34.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While more than half of pwMS are curious about their prognosis, only about one-third have optimal discussions about LTP with neurologists. Many desire information on prognostic tools. Further research is needed to assess patients' knowledge of their prognosis and improve communication with physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":19284,"journal":{"name":"Neurosciences","volume":"30 2","pages":"108-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do people with multiple sclerosis in Saudi Arabia want to know their prognosis? A cross-sectional nationwide study.\",\"authors\":\"Yaser M Al Malik, Awad S Alharbi, Mohammed A Alfurayh, Abdulaziz A Aldalaan, Abdulazeez M Alzailaie, Eid D Alanazi, Ahmad A Abulaban, Seraj O Makkawi, Asma A Alanazi\",\"doi\":\"10.17712/nsj.2025.2.20240094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether Persons with MS (pwMS) in Saudi Arabia want to discuss their long-term prognosis (LTP) and the factors influencing this decision using a self-administered online questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire was distributed from December 2022 to July 2023 across Saudi Arabia to determine pwMS interest in discussing their LTP. Participants included patients over 18 years, of any gender, diagnosed with MS. A nonprobability convenience sampling technique was used, with questionnaires sent through MS organizations and channels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost two-thirds (66-68%) of the 375 respondents reported that their LTP had never been discussed during neurologist appointments and expressed uncertainty about it. Additionally, 23.5% noted discrepancies in information provided by different neurologists. Most (81.6%) expressed a desire for a prognostic tool at diagnosis. In this study, MS patients' desire to learn about a tool for assessing long-term prognosis was significantly associated with age, education level (<i>p</i><0.001), and gender (<i>p</i>=0.02). A higher percentage of women (65.7%) showed interest in learning about the tool compared to men (34.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While more than half of pwMS are curious about their prognosis, only about one-third have optimal discussions about LTP with neurologists. Many desire information on prognostic tools. Further research is needed to assess patients' knowledge of their prognosis and improve communication with physicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"108-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2025.2.20240094\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2025.2.20240094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查沙特阿拉伯的多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者是否希望通过自我管理的在线问卷讨论他们的长期预后(LTP)以及影响这一决定的因素。方法:在这项横断面研究中,从2022年12月到2023年7月,在沙特阿拉伯各地分发了一份在线问卷,以确定pwMS对讨论其LTP的兴趣。研究对象包括年龄在18岁以上、性别不限的多发性硬化症患者。采用非概率方便抽样技术,通过多发性硬化症组织和渠道发送问卷。结果:375名受访者中几乎三分之二(66-68%)的人报告说,他们的LTP从未在神经科医生预约期间被讨论过,并对此表示不确定。此外,23.5%的人注意到不同神经科医生提供的信息存在差异。大多数(81.6%)表示希望在诊断时使用预后工具。在本研究中,MS患者了解评估长期预后工具的愿望与年龄、教育水平显著相关(pp=0.02)。与男性(34.3%)相比,女性(65.7%)对学习该工具感兴趣的比例更高。结论:虽然超过一半的pwMS患者对其预后感到好奇,但只有约三分之一的患者与神经科医生就LTP进行了最佳讨论。许多人希望获得有关预后工具的信息。需要进一步的研究来评估患者对其预后的了解,并改善与医生的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do people with multiple sclerosis in Saudi Arabia want to know their prognosis? A cross-sectional nationwide study.

Objectives: To investigate whether Persons with MS (pwMS) in Saudi Arabia want to discuss their long-term prognosis (LTP) and the factors influencing this decision using a self-administered online questionnaire.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire was distributed from December 2022 to July 2023 across Saudi Arabia to determine pwMS interest in discussing their LTP. Participants included patients over 18 years, of any gender, diagnosed with MS. A nonprobability convenience sampling technique was used, with questionnaires sent through MS organizations and channels.

Results: Almost two-thirds (66-68%) of the 375 respondents reported that their LTP had never been discussed during neurologist appointments and expressed uncertainty about it. Additionally, 23.5% noted discrepancies in information provided by different neurologists. Most (81.6%) expressed a desire for a prognostic tool at diagnosis. In this study, MS patients' desire to learn about a tool for assessing long-term prognosis was significantly associated with age, education level (p<0.001), and gender (p=0.02). A higher percentage of women (65.7%) showed interest in learning about the tool compared to men (34.3%).

Conclusion: While more than half of pwMS are curious about their prognosis, only about one-third have optimal discussions about LTP with neurologists. Many desire information on prognostic tools. Further research is needed to assess patients' knowledge of their prognosis and improve communication with physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosciences
Neurosciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Neurosciences is an open access, peer-reviewed, quarterly publication. Authors are invited to submit for publication articles reporting original work related to the nervous system, e.g., neurology, neurophysiology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurorehabilitation, neurooncology, neuropsychiatry, and neurogenetics, etc. Basic research withclear clinical implications will also be considered. Review articles of current interest and high standard are welcomed for consideration. Prospective workshould not be backdated. There are also sections for Case Reports, Brief Communication, Correspondence, and medical news items. To promote continuous education, training, and learning, we include Clinical Images and MCQ’s. Highlights of international and regional meetings of interest, and specialized supplements will also be considered. All submissions must conform to the Uniform Requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信