Kevimy Agossa, Hamoun Sabri, Dumitru Chele, Javier Calatrava, Michel Bravard, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"结缔组织移植物在骨内缺损再生治疗中的作用:系统回顾和meta -回归分析。","authors":"Kevimy Agossa, Hamoun Sabri, Dumitru Chele, Javier Calatrava, Michel Bravard, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.1111/jre.13402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effect of connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects (IDs), focusing on changes in postoperative gingival recession (GR) depth and regenerative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE-PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for articles published through December 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment outcomes in IDs treated with or without CTG were included in a meta-regression analysis. A mixed-effect linear regression model was employed to estimate the effect of CTG on postoperative GR depth, probing depth (PPD) reduction, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, and bone fill (BF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were selected, with five RCTs (176 IDs) included in the meta-regression. Of these, two RCTs compared bone graft (BG) + CTG to BG + resorbable membrane (MB), one compared periosteal vs. nonperiosteal CTG combined with BG, one compared open flap debridement (OFD) + CTG to OFD alone, and one compared BG + CTG to either OFD or MB. The use of CTG was significantly associated with a reduction in GR (mean effect size of 0.981 mm, 95% CI: 0.573 to 1.389, p = 0.001), PPD (mean effect size of 1.160 mm, 95% CI: 0.318 to 2.002, p = 0.010), as well as improvements in CAL (mean effect size of 1.105 mm, 95% CI: 0.420 to 1.790, p = 0.004) and BF (mean effect size of 1.382 mm, 95% CI: 0.595 to 2.169, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of the study, the use of CTG in periodontal regenerative therapy for IDs appears beneficial in reducing postoperative GR and might further enhance regenerative outcomes compared to treatments without CTG.</p>","PeriodicalId":16715,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontal research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Connective Tissue Grafts in the Regenerative Treatment of Intrabony Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kevimy Agossa, Hamoun Sabri, Dumitru Chele, Javier Calatrava, Michel Bravard, Hom-Lay Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jre.13402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effect of connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects (IDs), focusing on changes in postoperative gingival recession (GR) depth and regenerative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE-PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for articles published through December 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment outcomes in IDs treated with or without CTG were included in a meta-regression analysis. A mixed-effect linear regression model was employed to estimate the effect of CTG on postoperative GR depth, probing depth (PPD) reduction, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, and bone fill (BF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were selected, with five RCTs (176 IDs) included in the meta-regression. Of these, two RCTs compared bone graft (BG) + CTG to BG + resorbable membrane (MB), one compared periosteal vs. nonperiosteal CTG combined with BG, one compared open flap debridement (OFD) + CTG to OFD alone, and one compared BG + CTG to either OFD or MB. The use of CTG was significantly associated with a reduction in GR (mean effect size of 0.981 mm, 95% CI: 0.573 to 1.389, p = 0.001), PPD (mean effect size of 1.160 mm, 95% CI: 0.318 to 2.002, p = 0.010), as well as improvements in CAL (mean effect size of 1.105 mm, 95% CI: 0.420 to 1.790, p = 0.004) and BF (mean effect size of 1.382 mm, 95% CI: 0.595 to 2.169, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of the study, the use of CTG in periodontal regenerative therapy for IDs appears beneficial in reducing postoperative GR and might further enhance regenerative outcomes compared to treatments without CTG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of periodontal research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of periodontal research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13402\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontal research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.13402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价结缔组织移植(CTG)治疗牙周骨内缺损(IDs)的效果,重点观察术后龈退(GR)深度和再生效果的变化。方法:系统检索MEDLINE-PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane CENTRAL和谷歌Scholar,检索截止2024年12月31日发表的文章。随机对照试验(rct)比较使用或不使用CTG治疗的IDs的治疗结果纳入meta回归分析。采用混合效应线性回归模型估计CTG对术后GR深度、探查深度(PPD)降低、临床附着水平(CAL)增加和骨填充(BF)的影响。结果:共纳入23项研究,其中5项rct (176 id)纳入meta回归。相比这些,两个相关的骨移植物(BG) + CTG BG + resorbable膜(MB),一个比较骨膜与nonperiosteal CTG结合BG,相比一个开放皮瓣清创术(海底钻井)+ CTG海底钻井,BG +玻纤相比,一个海底钻井或MB。使用CTG能显著减少GR(平均效应值是0.981 mm, 95%置信区间CI: 0.573 - 1.389, p = 0.001),产后抑郁症(平均效应值是1.160 mm, 95%置信区间CI:0.318至2.002,p = 0.010),以及CAL(平均效应量1.105 mm, 95% CI: 0.420至1.790,p = 0.004)和BF(平均效应量1.382 mm, 95% CI: 0.595至2.169,p = 0.002)的改善。结论:在本研究的限制范围内,与不使用CTG的治疗相比,在牙周再生治疗中使用CTG有助于降低术后GR,并可能进一步提高再生效果。
Effect of Connective Tissue Grafts in the Regenerative Treatment of Intrabony Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.
Aim: To assess the effect of connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects (IDs), focusing on changes in postoperative gingival recession (GR) depth and regenerative outcomes.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across MEDLINE-PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for articles published through December 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment outcomes in IDs treated with or without CTG were included in a meta-regression analysis. A mixed-effect linear regression model was employed to estimate the effect of CTG on postoperative GR depth, probing depth (PPD) reduction, clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, and bone fill (BF).
Results: Twenty-three studies were selected, with five RCTs (176 IDs) included in the meta-regression. Of these, two RCTs compared bone graft (BG) + CTG to BG + resorbable membrane (MB), one compared periosteal vs. nonperiosteal CTG combined with BG, one compared open flap debridement (OFD) + CTG to OFD alone, and one compared BG + CTG to either OFD or MB. The use of CTG was significantly associated with a reduction in GR (mean effect size of 0.981 mm, 95% CI: 0.573 to 1.389, p = 0.001), PPD (mean effect size of 1.160 mm, 95% CI: 0.318 to 2.002, p = 0.010), as well as improvements in CAL (mean effect size of 1.105 mm, 95% CI: 0.420 to 1.790, p = 0.004) and BF (mean effect size of 1.382 mm, 95% CI: 0.595 to 2.169, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, the use of CTG in periodontal regenerative therapy for IDs appears beneficial in reducing postoperative GR and might further enhance regenerative outcomes compared to treatments without CTG.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Periodontal Research is an international research periodical the purpose of which is to publish original clinical and basic investigations and review articles concerned with every aspect of periodontology and related sciences. Brief communications (1-3 journal pages) are also accepted and a special effort is made to ensure their rapid publication. Reports of scientific meetings in periodontology and related fields are also published.
One volume of six issues is published annually.