慢性脊髓损伤再生的生物学和药理学增强。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01328-8
P S John, Ann Maria John, Jobin Mathew, Vidhu Joshy
{"title":"慢性脊髓损伤再生的生物学和药理学增强。","authors":"P S John, Ann Maria John, Jobin Mathew, Vidhu Joshy","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01328-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study.</p><p><strong>Primary objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of multiple bone marrow implantations and co-administration of citicoline to multiple bone marrow implantations alone in the treatment of chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at Fathima Matha Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Center in Kottayam, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three participants with chronic traumatic SCI, classified as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B, or C, were recruited and randomized into two groups. The first group (BMCT group) received multiple intrathecal implantations of autologous non-manipulated bone marrow aspirate along with oral citicoline (Cytidine Diphosphate Choline). The second group (BM group) received only multiple intrathecal bone marrow implantations. Patients were assessed at baseline and followed up every three months for 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comprehensive evaluation upon completion of the treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvements in AIS, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) score, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) score and modified Ashworth score in the BMCT group compared to the BM group. The BMCT group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in motor and sensory scores also. Fractional Anisotropy (FA) values of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) recorded statistically significant improvement in both the groups after treatment. The Diffusion Tensor Tractography (DTT) recorded considerable improvement only in the BMCT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study observed statistically significant functional and neurological recovery in the BMCT group. The statistically significant increase in FA values recorded in both groups and the post-treatment improvements in DTT and MRI in the BMCT group are imaging evidences of spinal cord regeneration.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01328-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 3","pages":"438-449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological and Pharmacological Enhancement of Regeneration in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"P S John, Ann Maria John, Jobin Mathew, Vidhu Joshy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-024-01328-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study.</p><p><strong>Primary objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of multiple bone marrow implantations and co-administration of citicoline to multiple bone marrow implantations alone in the treatment of chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at Fathima Matha Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Center in Kottayam, India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three participants with chronic traumatic SCI, classified as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B, or C, were recruited and randomized into two groups. The first group (BMCT group) received multiple intrathecal implantations of autologous non-manipulated bone marrow aspirate along with oral citicoline (Cytidine Diphosphate Choline). The second group (BM group) received only multiple intrathecal bone marrow implantations. Patients were assessed at baseline and followed up every three months for 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comprehensive evaluation upon completion of the treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvements in AIS, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) score, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) score and modified Ashworth score in the BMCT group compared to the BM group. The BMCT group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in motor and sensory scores also. Fractional Anisotropy (FA) values of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) recorded statistically significant improvement in both the groups after treatment. The Diffusion Tensor Tractography (DTT) recorded considerable improvement only in the BMCT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study observed statistically significant functional and neurological recovery in the BMCT group. The statistically significant increase in FA values recorded in both groups and the post-treatment improvements in DTT and MRI in the BMCT group are imaging evidences of spinal cord regeneration.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01328-8.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"438-449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01328-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01328-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计前瞻性、随机、单盲、比较研究:比较在治疗慢性脊髓损伤(SCI)时多次骨髓植入和联合应用柠檬胆碱与单独多次骨髓植入的疗效:研究在印度科塔亚姆的 Fathima Matha 物理治疗和康复中心进行:方法:招募 23 名患有慢性创伤性 SCI 的参与者,将其随机分为两组,他们被归类为美国脊柱损伤协会损伤量表(AIS)A、B 或 C 级。第一组(BMCT 组)在口服柠檬胆碱(二磷酸胞苷胆碱)的同时,多次鞘内植入自体非操纵性骨髓抽吸物。第二组(骨髓移植组)只接受多次鞘内骨髓植入。对患者进行基线评估,并在 24 个月内每三个月随访一次:治疗结束后进行的综合评估显示,与 BM 组相比,BMCT 组在 AIS、脊髓独立性测量(SCIM)评分、脊髓损伤行走指数(WISCI)评分和改良阿什沃斯评分方面均有统计学意义上的显著改善。BMCT 组在运动和感觉评分方面也有显著的统计学改善。扩散张量成像(DTI)的分数各向异性(FA)值在两组治疗后都有统计学意义上的显著改善。只有 BMCT 组的弥散张量断层成像(DTT)有明显改善:结论:本研究观察到 BMCT 组的功能和神经系统恢复在统计学上有明显改善。两组患者的 FA 值均有统计学意义上的明显增加,治疗后 BMCT 组的 DTT 和 MRI 均有改善,这些都是脊髓再生的影像学证据:在线版本包含补充材料,可在 10.1007/s43465-024-01328-8上查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biological and Pharmacological Enhancement of Regeneration in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Study design: Prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study.

Primary objective: To compare the efficacy of multiple bone marrow implantations and co-administration of citicoline to multiple bone marrow implantations alone in the treatment of chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).

Setting: The study was conducted at Fathima Matha Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Center in Kottayam, India.

Methods: Twenty-three participants with chronic traumatic SCI, classified as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B, or C, were recruited and randomized into two groups. The first group (BMCT group) received multiple intrathecal implantations of autologous non-manipulated bone marrow aspirate along with oral citicoline (Cytidine Diphosphate Choline). The second group (BM group) received only multiple intrathecal bone marrow implantations. Patients were assessed at baseline and followed up every three months for 24 months.

Results: Comprehensive evaluation upon completion of the treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvements in AIS, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) score, Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) score and modified Ashworth score in the BMCT group compared to the BM group. The BMCT group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in motor and sensory scores also. Fractional Anisotropy (FA) values of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) recorded statistically significant improvement in both the groups after treatment. The Diffusion Tensor Tractography (DTT) recorded considerable improvement only in the BMCT group.

Conclusions: This study observed statistically significant functional and neurological recovery in the BMCT group. The statistically significant increase in FA values recorded in both groups and the post-treatment improvements in DTT and MRI in the BMCT group are imaging evidences of spinal cord regeneration.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01328-8.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信