心肌病基因检测:洞察人口统计学,咨询,和级联筛选。

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Future cardiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1080/14796678.2025.2484128
Quan M Bui, Elizabeth Silver, Alessia Argiro, Sarah Murray, Lauren Korty, Jorge Silva Enciso, Marcus A Urey, Neil C Chi, Kimberly N Hong, Eric D Adler
{"title":"心肌病基因检测:洞察人口统计学,咨询,和级联筛选。","authors":"Quan M Bui, Elizabeth Silver, Alessia Argiro, Sarah Murray, Lauren Korty, Jorge Silva Enciso, Marcus A Urey, Neil C Chi, Kimberly N Hong, Eric D Adler","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2025.2484128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic testing (GT) is clinically indicated for patients with suspected inherited cardiomyopathy (CM) but is underutilized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study included patients with CM who underwent outpatient GT from 2018 to 2023. Data were collected from the medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 306 patients were included, with a mean age of 62 years and were predominantly male (63%) and White (59%). Heart failure (92%) cardiologists were most likely to order testing, followed by general cardiology (5%) providers at tertiary hospital clinics (89%). The most common phenotypes were hypertrophic (30%), amyloid (29%) and dilated (21%). There were 17% of patients who had a positive test and 53% of patients who had a variant of uncertain significance. Patients with a positive family history had a significantly higher positive yield compared to those without (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Genetic counselors were underutilized (17%). For patients who had a positive test result, only 40% had cascade screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient GT for CM was primarily ordered by heart failure cardiologists in tertiary hospital clinics. Cascade screening was low, which may reflect the limited use of genetic counselors. Further research is needed to understand implementation barriers to GT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"359-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiomyopathy genetic testing: insights into demographics, counseling, and cascade screening.\",\"authors\":\"Quan M Bui, Elizabeth Silver, Alessia Argiro, Sarah Murray, Lauren Korty, Jorge Silva Enciso, Marcus A Urey, Neil C Chi, Kimberly N Hong, Eric D Adler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796678.2025.2484128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic testing (GT) is clinically indicated for patients with suspected inherited cardiomyopathy (CM) but is underutilized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study included patients with CM who underwent outpatient GT from 2018 to 2023. Data were collected from the medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 306 patients were included, with a mean age of 62 years and were predominantly male (63%) and White (59%). Heart failure (92%) cardiologists were most likely to order testing, followed by general cardiology (5%) providers at tertiary hospital clinics (89%). The most common phenotypes were hypertrophic (30%), amyloid (29%) and dilated (21%). There were 17% of patients who had a positive test and 53% of patients who had a variant of uncertain significance. Patients with a positive family history had a significantly higher positive yield compared to those without (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Genetic counselors were underutilized (17%). For patients who had a positive test result, only 40% had cascade screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient GT for CM was primarily ordered by heart failure cardiologists in tertiary hospital clinics. Cascade screening was low, which may reflect the limited use of genetic counselors. Further research is needed to understand implementation barriers to GT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"359-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026082/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2025.2484128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2025.2484128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基因检测(GT)在临床上适用于疑似遗传性心肌病(CM)的患者,但未得到充分利用。方法:该单中心研究纳入了2018年至2023年接受门诊GT治疗的CM患者。数据是从医疗记录中收集的。结果:共纳入306例患者,平均年龄62岁,主要为男性(63%)和白人(59%)。心力衰竭(92%)心脏病专家最有可能要求进行检测,其次是普通心脏病学(5%)和三级医院诊所的医生(89%)。最常见的表型是肥厚(30%)、淀粉样(29%)和扩张(21%)。17%的患者检测结果呈阳性,53%的患者有不确定意义的变异。有阳性家族史的患者的阳性产率明显高于无家族史的患者(p < 0.01)。遗传咨询师未被充分利用(17%)。对于检测结果呈阳性的患者,只有40%的患者进行了级联筛查。结论:门诊GT治疗CM主要是由三级医院诊所的心力衰竭心脏病专家安排的。级联筛查低,这可能反映了遗传咨询师的有限使用。需要进一步的研究来了解GT的实施障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiomyopathy genetic testing: insights into demographics, counseling, and cascade screening.

Background: Genetic testing (GT) is clinically indicated for patients with suspected inherited cardiomyopathy (CM) but is underutilized.

Methods: This single-center study included patients with CM who underwent outpatient GT from 2018 to 2023. Data were collected from the medical record.

Results: A total of 306 patients were included, with a mean age of 62 years and were predominantly male (63%) and White (59%). Heart failure (92%) cardiologists were most likely to order testing, followed by general cardiology (5%) providers at tertiary hospital clinics (89%). The most common phenotypes were hypertrophic (30%), amyloid (29%) and dilated (21%). There were 17% of patients who had a positive test and 53% of patients who had a variant of uncertain significance. Patients with a positive family history had a significantly higher positive yield compared to those without (p < 0.01). Genetic counselors were underutilized (17%). For patients who had a positive test result, only 40% had cascade screening.

Conclusions: Outpatient GT for CM was primarily ordered by heart failure cardiologists in tertiary hospital clinics. Cascade screening was low, which may reflect the limited use of genetic counselors. Further research is needed to understand implementation barriers to GT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future cardiology
Future cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信