视网膜厚度是枕叶梗死患者视力丧失的指标。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1546439
Xueling Bai, Le Cao, Hang Wang, William Robert Kwapong, Yuying Yan, Guina Liu, Junfeng Liu, Fayun Hu, Bo Wu
{"title":"视网膜厚度是枕叶梗死患者视力丧失的指标。","authors":"Xueling Bai, Le Cao, Hang Wang, William Robert Kwapong, Yuying Yan, Guina Liu, Junfeng Liu, Fayun Hu, Bo Wu","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1546439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We explored the relationship between retinal thicknesses and vessels using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT)/ OCT angiography (OCTA) and clinical outcomes in occipital lobe infarction (OI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 52 OI patients and 105 controls underwent macular OCT/OCTA scans covering a 6 × 6 mm<sup>2</sup> area around the fovea. The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), superficial vascular complex (SVC), and deep vascular complex (DVC) were measured using the OCT/OCTA tool. All participants underwent a visual acuity examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OI patients showed reduced GCIPL thickness and lower SVC density but higher DVC density (all <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to the controls, both in the whole area and across the four sectors. Eyes ipsilateral or contralateral to infarction showed reduced GCIPL thickness and lower SVC density (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The GCIPL thickness was significantly correlated with the infarct diameter and visual acuity (both <i>p</i> < 0.05), while the SVC density was also significantly correlated with the infarct diameter (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The visual acuity showed a significant association with the infarct diameter (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and the reduction of the GCIPL partially mediated this effect (a proportion of the mediated effect at 15.17%, <i>p</i> = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCIPL thinning may account for the effect of infarct diameter on visual acuity in OI patients. Future prospective studies are needed to assess OCT/OCTA as a potential marker of visual loss in OI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1546439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retinal thickness is indicative of visual loss in patients with occipital lobe infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Xueling Bai, Le Cao, Hang Wang, William Robert Kwapong, Yuying Yan, Guina Liu, Junfeng Liu, Fayun Hu, Bo Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fneur.2025.1546439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We explored the relationship between retinal thicknesses and vessels using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT)/ OCT angiography (OCTA) and clinical outcomes in occipital lobe infarction (OI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 52 OI patients and 105 controls underwent macular OCT/OCTA scans covering a 6 × 6 mm<sup>2</sup> area around the fovea. The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), superficial vascular complex (SVC), and deep vascular complex (DVC) were measured using the OCT/OCTA tool. All participants underwent a visual acuity examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OI patients showed reduced GCIPL thickness and lower SVC density but higher DVC density (all <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to the controls, both in the whole area and across the four sectors. Eyes ipsilateral or contralateral to infarction showed reduced GCIPL thickness and lower SVC density (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). The GCIPL thickness was significantly correlated with the infarct diameter and visual acuity (both <i>p</i> < 0.05), while the SVC density was also significantly correlated with the infarct diameter (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The visual acuity showed a significant association with the infarct diameter (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and the reduction of the GCIPL partially mediated this effect (a proportion of the mediated effect at 15.17%, <i>p</i> = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCIPL thinning may account for the effect of infarct diameter on visual acuity in OI patients. Future prospective studies are needed to assess OCT/OCTA as a potential marker of visual loss in OI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1546439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975593/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1546439\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1546439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCT)/ OCT血管造影(OCTA)与枕叶梗死(OI)患者视网膜厚度和血管的关系。方法:对52例成骨不全患者和105例对照患者进行黄斑OCT/OCTA扫描,扫描范围覆盖中央凹周围6 × 6 mm2区域。采用OCT/OCTA工具测量视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)、神经节细胞-内丛状层(GCIPL)、浅血管复合体(SVC)和深血管复合体(DVC)。所有参与者都进行了视力检查。结果:成骨不全患者GCIPL厚度降低,SVC密度降低,DVC密度升高(p均为 p p p = 0.002)。视力与梗死直径有显著相关性(p p = 0.028)。结论:GCIPL变薄可能解释了梗死直径对成骨不全患者视力的影响。未来的前瞻性研究需要评估OCT/OCTA作为成骨不全患者视力丧失的潜在标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retinal thickness is indicative of visual loss in patients with occipital lobe infarction.

Purpose: We explored the relationship between retinal thicknesses and vessels using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT)/ OCT angiography (OCTA) and clinical outcomes in occipital lobe infarction (OI).

Methods: A total of 52 OI patients and 105 controls underwent macular OCT/OCTA scans covering a 6 × 6 mm2 area around the fovea. The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), superficial vascular complex (SVC), and deep vascular complex (DVC) were measured using the OCT/OCTA tool. All participants underwent a visual acuity examination.

Results: OI patients showed reduced GCIPL thickness and lower SVC density but higher DVC density (all p < 0.001) compared to the controls, both in the whole area and across the four sectors. Eyes ipsilateral or contralateral to infarction showed reduced GCIPL thickness and lower SVC density (all p < 0.05). The GCIPL thickness was significantly correlated with the infarct diameter and visual acuity (both p < 0.05), while the SVC density was also significantly correlated with the infarct diameter (p = 0.002). The visual acuity showed a significant association with the infarct diameter (p < 0.001), and the reduction of the GCIPL partially mediated this effect (a proportion of the mediated effect at 15.17%, p = 0.028).

Conclusion: GCIPL thinning may account for the effect of infarct diameter on visual acuity in OI patients. Future prospective studies are needed to assess OCT/OCTA as a potential marker of visual loss in OI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信