Yaron Rudman, Neta Simon, Rona Shimon, Genady Drozdinsky, Efrat Markus, Hadar Duskin-Bitan, Hiba Masri-Iraqi, Gloria Tsvetov, Amit Akirov, Ilan Shimon
{"title":"微催乳素瘤男性患者对卡麦角林治疗的反应、性腺轴恢复和停药的结果:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Yaron Rudman, Neta Simon, Rona Shimon, Genady Drozdinsky, Efrat Markus, Hadar Duskin-Bitan, Hiba Masri-Iraqi, Gloria Tsvetov, Amit Akirov, Ilan Shimon","doi":"10.1007/s12020-025-04215-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to the low incidence of male microprolactinoma, there is a paucity of data in the literature regarding its management. Our aim was to investigate the long-term outcomes of cabergoline treatment in men with microprolactinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we reviewed patient's records at prolactinoma diagnosis, following cabergoline discontinuation (if occurred), and at the last clinic visit. We collected all available clinical data, laboratory tests, and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. We report response rates, gonadal axis recovery, and outcomes following cabergoline discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 47 men with microprolactinoma [age at diagnosis 45.6 ± 17.6 years; median prolactin 70.0 ng/ml (IQR 51.0-103.4); low testosterone, 34 men (72.3%); adenoma diameter 5.6 ± 2.0 mm; median follow-up 7.1 years (IQR 3.5-10.4)]. Forty-two patients (89.4%) achieved normal prolactin levels within a median treatment time of 4.0 months (IQR 3.0-5.5) and had normal testosterone at last clinic visit. Five men (10.6%) did not achieve prolactin normalization, of whom 3 men remained hypogonadal. Mild side effects occurred in 4.3% of patients and disappeared with dose reduction. Thirteen men that achieved normal prolactin attempted drug discontinuation, but only 5 remained with normoprolactinemia. Men who maintained normal prolactin levels were treated longer with cabergoline [median treatment of 10 years (IQR 4.6-10.3) vs 2.0 years (IQR 1.5-3.2); p < 0.01].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ninety percent of men harboring microprolactinoma achieved normoprolactinemia and subsequent testosterone normalization with cabergoline treatment. Men that discontinued cabergoline after prolonged prolactin suppression (>5 years) achieved sustained remission. These findings assist informed decision-making, between medical and surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11572,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to cabergoline treatment, gonadal axis recovery, and outcomes of drug withdrawal, in men with microprolactinoma: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yaron Rudman, Neta Simon, Rona Shimon, Genady Drozdinsky, Efrat Markus, Hadar Duskin-Bitan, Hiba Masri-Iraqi, Gloria Tsvetov, Amit Akirov, Ilan Shimon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12020-025-04215-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to the low incidence of male microprolactinoma, there is a paucity of data in the literature regarding its management. Our aim was to investigate the long-term outcomes of cabergoline treatment in men with microprolactinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we reviewed patient's records at prolactinoma diagnosis, following cabergoline discontinuation (if occurred), and at the last clinic visit. We collected all available clinical data, laboratory tests, and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. We report response rates, gonadal axis recovery, and outcomes following cabergoline discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 47 men with microprolactinoma [age at diagnosis 45.6 ± 17.6 years; median prolactin 70.0 ng/ml (IQR 51.0-103.4); low testosterone, 34 men (72.3%); adenoma diameter 5.6 ± 2.0 mm; median follow-up 7.1 years (IQR 3.5-10.4)]. Forty-two patients (89.4%) achieved normal prolactin levels within a median treatment time of 4.0 months (IQR 3.0-5.5) and had normal testosterone at last clinic visit. Five men (10.6%) did not achieve prolactin normalization, of whom 3 men remained hypogonadal. Mild side effects occurred in 4.3% of patients and disappeared with dose reduction. Thirteen men that achieved normal prolactin attempted drug discontinuation, but only 5 remained with normoprolactinemia. Men who maintained normal prolactin levels were treated longer with cabergoline [median treatment of 10 years (IQR 4.6-10.3) vs 2.0 years (IQR 1.5-3.2); p < 0.01].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ninety percent of men harboring microprolactinoma achieved normoprolactinemia and subsequent testosterone normalization with cabergoline treatment. Men that discontinued cabergoline after prolonged prolactin suppression (>5 years) achieved sustained remission. These findings assist informed decision-making, between medical and surgical treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-025-04215-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-025-04215-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Response to cabergoline treatment, gonadal axis recovery, and outcomes of drug withdrawal, in men with microprolactinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Purpose: Due to the low incidence of male microprolactinoma, there is a paucity of data in the literature regarding its management. Our aim was to investigate the long-term outcomes of cabergoline treatment in men with microprolactinoma.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we reviewed patient's records at prolactinoma diagnosis, following cabergoline discontinuation (if occurred), and at the last clinic visit. We collected all available clinical data, laboratory tests, and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. We report response rates, gonadal axis recovery, and outcomes following cabergoline discontinuation.
Results: The study cohort included 47 men with microprolactinoma [age at diagnosis 45.6 ± 17.6 years; median prolactin 70.0 ng/ml (IQR 51.0-103.4); low testosterone, 34 men (72.3%); adenoma diameter 5.6 ± 2.0 mm; median follow-up 7.1 years (IQR 3.5-10.4)]. Forty-two patients (89.4%) achieved normal prolactin levels within a median treatment time of 4.0 months (IQR 3.0-5.5) and had normal testosterone at last clinic visit. Five men (10.6%) did not achieve prolactin normalization, of whom 3 men remained hypogonadal. Mild side effects occurred in 4.3% of patients and disappeared with dose reduction. Thirteen men that achieved normal prolactin attempted drug discontinuation, but only 5 remained with normoprolactinemia. Men who maintained normal prolactin levels were treated longer with cabergoline [median treatment of 10 years (IQR 4.6-10.3) vs 2.0 years (IQR 1.5-3.2); p < 0.01].
Conclusions: Ninety percent of men harboring microprolactinoma achieved normoprolactinemia and subsequent testosterone normalization with cabergoline treatment. Men that discontinued cabergoline after prolonged prolactin suppression (>5 years) achieved sustained remission. These findings assist informed decision-making, between medical and surgical treatment.
期刊介绍:
Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology.
Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted.
Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.