Bishoy Lawendy, Tayyaba Bhatti, Ayooluwatomiwa D Adekunle, Muni Rubens, Oyedotun Babajide, Mary Sedarous, Tahniyat Tariq, Philip N Okafor
{"title":"较高的住院患者种族和民族多样性与西班牙裔和美洲原住民胃肠道疾病患者更好的预后相关","authors":"Bishoy Lawendy, Tayyaba Bhatti, Ayooluwatomiwa D Adekunle, Muni Rubens, Oyedotun Babajide, Mary Sedarous, Tahniyat Tariq, Philip N Okafor","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09004-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that outcomes are poorer among patients from historically marginalized racial and ethnic backgrounds. The impact of patient racial and ethnic diversity on gastrointestinal outcomes is understudied.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the impact of patient racial/ethnic diversity on gastrointestinal disease (GI) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS), hospital inpatient racial/ethnic diversity was defined as the percentage of Hispanic or Native American discharges. We included gastrointestinal bleeding, inflammatory bowel diseases, gastrointestinal obstruction, cirrhosis, and alcohol-associated hepatitis. Logistic regression was used to predict outcomes [major complications (MCC), long length of stay, high total charges], controlling for age, gender, location, income quartile, hospital size, and region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 537,830 hospitalizations. In the unadjusted analyses, MCC rates were higher among Hispanic (24.8%) and Native American patients (30.4%), compared to Whites (18.3%). In adjusted analyses, compared to Whites, Hispanic [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.15-1.28] and Native American patients [OR 1.25, (95% CI) 1.09-1.43] had higher MCC rates. As hospital Hispanic diversity increased, MCC for Hispanics improved [OR 0.93, (95% CI) 0.87-1.14] and were even better among Native American patients as their diversity increased [OR 0.83, (95% CI) 0.73-0.94] (Table 1). A similar trend was observed in the 2018 validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing hospital inpatient Hispanic and Native American diversity is associated with better outcomes for these groups. Further research is needed on the impact cultural competence and linguistic concordance on gastrointestinal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher Inpatient Racial and Ethnic Diversity Is Associated with Better Outcomes in Hispanic and Native American Patients for Gastrointestinal Diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Bishoy Lawendy, Tayyaba Bhatti, Ayooluwatomiwa D Adekunle, Muni Rubens, Oyedotun Babajide, Mary Sedarous, Tahniyat Tariq, Philip N Okafor\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-025-09004-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that outcomes are poorer among patients from historically marginalized racial and ethnic backgrounds. The impact of patient racial and ethnic diversity on gastrointestinal outcomes is understudied.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the impact of patient racial/ethnic diversity on gastrointestinal disease (GI) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS), hospital inpatient racial/ethnic diversity was defined as the percentage of Hispanic or Native American discharges. We included gastrointestinal bleeding, inflammatory bowel diseases, gastrointestinal obstruction, cirrhosis, and alcohol-associated hepatitis. Logistic regression was used to predict outcomes [major complications (MCC), long length of stay, high total charges], controlling for age, gender, location, income quartile, hospital size, and region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 537,830 hospitalizations. In the unadjusted analyses, MCC rates were higher among Hispanic (24.8%) and Native American patients (30.4%), compared to Whites (18.3%). In adjusted analyses, compared to Whites, Hispanic [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.15-1.28] and Native American patients [OR 1.25, (95% CI) 1.09-1.43] had higher MCC rates. As hospital Hispanic diversity increased, MCC for Hispanics improved [OR 0.93, (95% CI) 0.87-1.14] and were even better among Native American patients as their diversity increased [OR 0.83, (95% CI) 0.73-0.94] (Table 1). A similar trend was observed in the 2018 validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increasing hospital inpatient Hispanic and Native American diversity is associated with better outcomes for these groups. Further research is needed on the impact cultural competence and linguistic concordance on gastrointestinal outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09004-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09004-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Higher Inpatient Racial and Ethnic Diversity Is Associated with Better Outcomes in Hispanic and Native American Patients for Gastrointestinal Diseases.
Background: Evidence suggests that outcomes are poorer among patients from historically marginalized racial and ethnic backgrounds. The impact of patient racial and ethnic diversity on gastrointestinal outcomes is understudied.
Aims: To investigate the impact of patient racial/ethnic diversity on gastrointestinal disease (GI) outcomes.
Methods: Using the 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS), hospital inpatient racial/ethnic diversity was defined as the percentage of Hispanic or Native American discharges. We included gastrointestinal bleeding, inflammatory bowel diseases, gastrointestinal obstruction, cirrhosis, and alcohol-associated hepatitis. Logistic regression was used to predict outcomes [major complications (MCC), long length of stay, high total charges], controlling for age, gender, location, income quartile, hospital size, and region.
Results: Our cohort included 537,830 hospitalizations. In the unadjusted analyses, MCC rates were higher among Hispanic (24.8%) and Native American patients (30.4%), compared to Whites (18.3%). In adjusted analyses, compared to Whites, Hispanic [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.15-1.28] and Native American patients [OR 1.25, (95% CI) 1.09-1.43] had higher MCC rates. As hospital Hispanic diversity increased, MCC for Hispanics improved [OR 0.93, (95% CI) 0.87-1.14] and were even better among Native American patients as their diversity increased [OR 0.83, (95% CI) 0.73-0.94] (Table 1). A similar trend was observed in the 2018 validation cohort.
Conclusion: Increasing hospital inpatient Hispanic and Native American diversity is associated with better outcomes for these groups. Further research is needed on the impact cultural competence and linguistic concordance on gastrointestinal outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.