临床决策支持系统检测的直接口服抗凝剂与涉及cypp酶和P-gp转运体的药物之间的相互作用:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Stephanie C M Wuyts, Sophie Bonte, Naomi Thielemans, Fenne Vandervorst, Berlinde von Kemp, Stephane Steurbaut, Alain G Dupont, Pieter Cornu
{"title":"临床决策支持系统检测的直接口服抗凝剂与涉及cypp酶和P-gp转运体的药物之间的相互作用:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Stephanie C M Wuyts, Sophie Bonte, Naomi Thielemans, Fenne Vandervorst, Berlinde von Kemp, Stephane Steurbaut, Alain G Dupont, Pieter Cornu","doi":"10.1007/s10557-025-07691-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Physicians can be supported by electronic clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for drug-drug interaction (DDI) management of DDIs between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and CYP3 A4/P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors and inducers, to prevent adverse drug events (ADEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed studying DDI alerts for DOAC-CYP3 A4/P-gp influencing drug combination prescriptions in patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Patient-, DDI-, and ADE-related data were analyzed to explore CDSS performance and real-world DDI management. A multidisciplinary panel conducted an ADE analysis using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 15,201 triggered CDS alerts, 166 individual alerts were included. Primary indication for DOAC therapy was atrial fibrillation (86.1%). The most involved DOAC was dabigatran (63%). DDI exposure was median 3 days (IQR = 2-7 days). CYP3 A4/P-gp inhibitor DDIs were most prevalent (n = 121), with amiodarone being most prevalently prescribed (71%). Inducers were mainly antiepileptic drugs (n = 31). Thirty-four CDS alerts (20%) were actively shown to the physician upon prescribing (acceptance rate 50%). Eighteen ADEs were identified (11%, 14 bleeding; 4 thromboembolic events), 15 having a possible and 3 a probable probability of being DDI associated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a low number of observed, potentially associated ADEs, CDSS for DDI management aids physicians to optimize DOAC treatment as the described DDIs can cause significant patient harm. Increased ADE monitoring and larger real-world studies are needed to refine CDS tools and further optimize patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9557,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interactions Between Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Drugs Involving CYP-Enzymes and P-gp Transporters Detected by a Clinical Decision Support System: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie C M Wuyts, Sophie Bonte, Naomi Thielemans, Fenne Vandervorst, Berlinde von Kemp, Stephane Steurbaut, Alain G Dupont, Pieter Cornu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10557-025-07691-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Physicians can be supported by electronic clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for drug-drug interaction (DDI) management of DDIs between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and CYP3 A4/P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors and inducers, to prevent adverse drug events (ADEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed studying DDI alerts for DOAC-CYP3 A4/P-gp influencing drug combination prescriptions in patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Patient-, DDI-, and ADE-related data were analyzed to explore CDSS performance and real-world DDI management. A multidisciplinary panel conducted an ADE analysis using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 15,201 triggered CDS alerts, 166 individual alerts were included. Primary indication for DOAC therapy was atrial fibrillation (86.1%). The most involved DOAC was dabigatran (63%). DDI exposure was median 3 days (IQR = 2-7 days). CYP3 A4/P-gp inhibitor DDIs were most prevalent (n = 121), with amiodarone being most prevalently prescribed (71%). Inducers were mainly antiepileptic drugs (n = 31). Thirty-four CDS alerts (20%) were actively shown to the physician upon prescribing (acceptance rate 50%). Eighteen ADEs were identified (11%, 14 bleeding; 4 thromboembolic events), 15 having a possible and 3 a probable probability of being DDI associated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a low number of observed, potentially associated ADEs, CDSS for DDI management aids physicians to optimize DOAC treatment as the described DDIs can cause significant patient harm. Increased ADE monitoring and larger real-world studies are needed to refine CDS tools and further optimize patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-025-07691-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-025-07691-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:电子临床决策支持系统(CDSS)可支持医生对直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与CYP3 A4/ p -糖蛋白(P-gp)抑制剂和诱导剂之间的DDI进行药物相互作用(DDI)管理,以防止药物不良事件(ADEs)的发生。方法:采用回顾性队列研究,研究DOAC-CYP3 A4/P-gp DDI警报对三级医院住院患者联合用药处方的影响。分析患者、DDI和ade相关数据,以探讨CDSS的表现和现实世界的DDI管理。一个多学科小组使用药物相互作用概率量表进行ADE分析。结果:在15201个触发的CDS警报中,包括166个单独的警报。DOAC治疗的主要适应症为房颤(86.1%)。最常见的DOAC是达比加群(63%)。DDI暴露中位数为3天(IQR = 2-7天)。CYP3 A4/P-gp抑制剂ddi最为普遍(n = 121),其中胺碘酮最为普遍(71%)。诱导剂主要为抗癫痫药物(n = 31)。34个CDS警报(20%)在开处方时主动显示给医生(接受率50%)。发现ade 18例(11%,出血14例;4例血栓栓塞事件),15例可能与DDI相关,3例可能与DDI相关。结论:尽管观察到的潜在相关不良事件数量较少,但CDSS用于DDI管理有助于医生优化DOAC治疗,因为所描述的DDI会对患者造成重大伤害。需要增加ADE监测和更大规模的现实世界研究来完善CDS工具并进一步优化患者安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interactions Between Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Drugs Involving CYP-Enzymes and P-gp Transporters Detected by a Clinical Decision Support System: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: Physicians can be supported by electronic clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for drug-drug interaction (DDI) management of DDIs between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and CYP3 A4/P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors and inducers, to prevent adverse drug events (ADEs).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed studying DDI alerts for DOAC-CYP3 A4/P-gp influencing drug combination prescriptions in patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Patient-, DDI-, and ADE-related data were analyzed to explore CDSS performance and real-world DDI management. A multidisciplinary panel conducted an ADE analysis using the Drug Interaction Probability Scale.

Results: Out of 15,201 triggered CDS alerts, 166 individual alerts were included. Primary indication for DOAC therapy was atrial fibrillation (86.1%). The most involved DOAC was dabigatran (63%). DDI exposure was median 3 days (IQR = 2-7 days). CYP3 A4/P-gp inhibitor DDIs were most prevalent (n = 121), with amiodarone being most prevalently prescribed (71%). Inducers were mainly antiepileptic drugs (n = 31). Thirty-four CDS alerts (20%) were actively shown to the physician upon prescribing (acceptance rate 50%). Eighteen ADEs were identified (11%, 14 bleeding; 4 thromboembolic events), 15 having a possible and 3 a probable probability of being DDI associated.

Conclusion: Despite a low number of observed, potentially associated ADEs, CDSS for DDI management aids physicians to optimize DOAC treatment as the described DDIs can cause significant patient harm. Increased ADE monitoring and larger real-world studies are needed to refine CDS tools and further optimize patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Designed to objectively cover the process of bench to bedside development of cardiovascular drug, device and cell therapy, and to bring you the information you need most in a timely and useful format, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy takes a fresh and energetic look at advances in this dynamic field. Homing in on the most exciting work being done on new therapeutic agents, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy focusses on developments in atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ischemic syndromes and arrhythmias. The Journal is an authoritative source of current and relevant information that is indispensable for basic and clinical investigators aiming for novel, breakthrough research as well as for cardiologists seeking to best serve their patients. Providing you with a single, concise reference tool acknowledged to be among the finest in the world, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is listed in Web of Science and PubMed/Medline among other abstracting and indexing services. The regular articles and frequent special topical issues equip you with an up-to-date source defined by the need for accurate information on an ever-evolving field. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is a careful and accurate guide through the maze of new products and therapies which furnishes you with the details on cardiovascular pharmacology that you will refer to time and time again.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信