Chi Nguyen, Hanke Zheng, Michael Grabner, John Barron, Ruth Wangia Dixon, Mark Cziraky, Brian Sweet, Nathan Hill
{"title":"整合行政索赔和临床数据,推进肿瘤学真实世界的证据生成。","authors":"Chi Nguyen, Hanke Zheng, Michael Grabner, John Barron, Ruth Wangia Dixon, Mark Cziraky, Brian Sweet, Nathan Hill","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2482665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate capabilities of the Generating Evidence Excellence (GEx) research environment using Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) as a use-case.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with incident NSCLC were identified in GEx from 01/01/2015 to 12/31/2019. Two GEx data containers were used: (1) claims from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD) linked to clinical data from a Cancer Care Quality Program (CCQP) (HIRD+CCQP); (2) claims data from the HIRD and a second large commercially insured claims dataset (CD2) linked to electronic medical records from IntrinsiQ Specialty Solutions (IQSS) (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patient demographics and all-cause mortality were contrasted with the American Community Survey and the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) public use database. Descriptive analyses were completed <i>via</i> SAS Enterprise Guide 7.12 and SEER*stat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample comprised of 6,233 (HIRD+CCQP) and 1,176 (HIRD+ CD2 + IQSS) patients with NSCLC. Both GEx data containers had similar patient demographics with a mean age 63 years and 71% White, while 70% of USCS patients were ≥65 years and 85% White. Most patients resided in the South/Midwest regions of the US (74% (HIRD+CCQP) and 86% (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patients in GEx over-represented the working-age group, i.e. 65% were between 18 and 65 years old. Stage IV disease was frequently recorded at diagnosis (59.4% HIRD+CCQP, 44.0% HIRD+CD2 + IQSS, 46.1% USCS). All-cause mortality rate was 38.8 (HIRD+CCQP) and 27.3 (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS) per 100 person-years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis of NSCLC as a use-case demonstrated that GEx is a valuable data ecosystem with a generalizable working-age patient population and comprehensive data to facilitate timely real-world evidence generation in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of administrative claims and clinical data to advance real-world evidence generation in oncology.\",\"authors\":\"Chi Nguyen, Hanke Zheng, Michael Grabner, John Barron, Ruth Wangia Dixon, Mark Cziraky, Brian Sweet, Nathan Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2025.2482665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate capabilities of the Generating Evidence Excellence (GEx) research environment using Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) as a use-case.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with incident NSCLC were identified in GEx from 01/01/2015 to 12/31/2019. Two GEx data containers were used: (1) claims from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD) linked to clinical data from a Cancer Care Quality Program (CCQP) (HIRD+CCQP); (2) claims data from the HIRD and a second large commercially insured claims dataset (CD2) linked to electronic medical records from IntrinsiQ Specialty Solutions (IQSS) (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patient demographics and all-cause mortality were contrasted with the American Community Survey and the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) public use database. Descriptive analyses were completed <i>via</i> SAS Enterprise Guide 7.12 and SEER*stat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample comprised of 6,233 (HIRD+CCQP) and 1,176 (HIRD+ CD2 + IQSS) patients with NSCLC. Both GEx data containers had similar patient demographics with a mean age 63 years and 71% White, while 70% of USCS patients were ≥65 years and 85% White. Most patients resided in the South/Midwest regions of the US (74% (HIRD+CCQP) and 86% (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patients in GEx over-represented the working-age group, i.e. 65% were between 18 and 65 years old. Stage IV disease was frequently recorded at diagnosis (59.4% HIRD+CCQP, 44.0% HIRD+CD2 + IQSS, 46.1% USCS). All-cause mortality rate was 38.8 (HIRD+CCQP) and 27.3 (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS) per 100 person-years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis of NSCLC as a use-case demonstrated that GEx is a valuable data ecosystem with a generalizable working-age patient population and comprehensive data to facilitate timely real-world evidence generation in oncology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2482665\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2482665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integration of administrative claims and clinical data to advance real-world evidence generation in oncology.
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate capabilities of the Generating Evidence Excellence (GEx) research environment using Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) as a use-case.
Methods: Patients with incident NSCLC were identified in GEx from 01/01/2015 to 12/31/2019. Two GEx data containers were used: (1) claims from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD) linked to clinical data from a Cancer Care Quality Program (CCQP) (HIRD+CCQP); (2) claims data from the HIRD and a second large commercially insured claims dataset (CD2) linked to electronic medical records from IntrinsiQ Specialty Solutions (IQSS) (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patient demographics and all-cause mortality were contrasted with the American Community Survey and the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) public use database. Descriptive analyses were completed via SAS Enterprise Guide 7.12 and SEER*stat.
Results: The study sample comprised of 6,233 (HIRD+CCQP) and 1,176 (HIRD+ CD2 + IQSS) patients with NSCLC. Both GEx data containers had similar patient demographics with a mean age 63 years and 71% White, while 70% of USCS patients were ≥65 years and 85% White. Most patients resided in the South/Midwest regions of the US (74% (HIRD+CCQP) and 86% (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS). Patients in GEx over-represented the working-age group, i.e. 65% were between 18 and 65 years old. Stage IV disease was frequently recorded at diagnosis (59.4% HIRD+CCQP, 44.0% HIRD+CD2 + IQSS, 46.1% USCS). All-cause mortality rate was 38.8 (HIRD+CCQP) and 27.3 (HIRD+CD2 + IQSS) per 100 person-years.
Conclusions: The analysis of NSCLC as a use-case demonstrated that GEx is a valuable data ecosystem with a generalizable working-age patient population and comprehensive data to facilitate timely real-world evidence generation in oncology.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance