欧洲生物分析论坛最近关于挑战三级免疫原性测试策略的讨论和建议。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Kyra J Cowan, Karien Bloem, Annelies Coddens, Laura Creed, Hannah Higgins, Jonathan Jimenez Novoa, Christopher Jones, Yvonne Katterle, Marco Klinge, Ben Leatherdale, Birgit Jaitner, Peter van Bommel, Saskia van der Lee, Michaela Golob, Rob Nelson, Philip Timmerman
{"title":"欧洲生物分析论坛最近关于挑战三级免疫原性测试策略的讨论和建议。","authors":"Kyra J Cowan, Karien Bloem, Annelies Coddens, Laura Creed, Hannah Higgins, Jonathan Jimenez Novoa, Christopher Jones, Yvonne Katterle, Marco Klinge, Ben Leatherdale, Birgit Jaitner, Peter van Bommel, Saskia van der Lee, Michaela Golob, Rob Nelson, Philip Timmerman","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2025.2487377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Bioanalysis Forum, in discussions with cross-industry experts from pharmaceutical, biotech, and contract research organizations, is continuing the challenge of the traditional 3-Tier immunogenicity testing strategy, proposing a simpler, context-driven 1-Tier approach, a recent paradigm shift that emphasizes clinical relevance and the impact of anti-drug antibodies over mere incidence. In a workshop at the 17<sup>th</sup> annual Open Symposium, the meeting highlighted using signal-to-noise ratios to assess low-level ADA responses and addressed challenges such as nonspecific binding and assay reliability. Participants debated the need for continued confirmatory testing, and that it should be performed on a case-by-case basis. The shift aims to improve clinical testing strategies while reducing complexity, promoting data-driven decisions. Case studies, particularly from high-risk molecules, will guide implementation. Overall, there's strong support for the 1-Tier approach, but its success depends on robust data, industry collaboration, and regulatory approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent discussions and proposals on challenging the 3-tier immunogenicity testing strategies from the European bioanalysis forum.\",\"authors\":\"Kyra J Cowan, Karien Bloem, Annelies Coddens, Laura Creed, Hannah Higgins, Jonathan Jimenez Novoa, Christopher Jones, Yvonne Katterle, Marco Klinge, Ben Leatherdale, Birgit Jaitner, Peter van Bommel, Saskia van der Lee, Michaela Golob, Rob Nelson, Philip Timmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17576180.2025.2487377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The European Bioanalysis Forum, in discussions with cross-industry experts from pharmaceutical, biotech, and contract research organizations, is continuing the challenge of the traditional 3-Tier immunogenicity testing strategy, proposing a simpler, context-driven 1-Tier approach, a recent paradigm shift that emphasizes clinical relevance and the impact of anti-drug antibodies over mere incidence. In a workshop at the 17<sup>th</sup> annual Open Symposium, the meeting highlighted using signal-to-noise ratios to assess low-level ADA responses and addressed challenges such as nonspecific binding and assay reliability. Participants debated the need for continued confirmatory testing, and that it should be performed on a case-by-case basis. The shift aims to improve clinical testing strategies while reducing complexity, promoting data-driven decisions. Case studies, particularly from high-risk molecules, will guide implementation. Overall, there's strong support for the 1-Tier approach, but its success depends on robust data, industry collaboration, and regulatory approval.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2487377\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2487377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲生物分析论坛在与来自制药、生物技术和合同研究组织的跨行业专家的讨论中,继续挑战传统的3层免疫原性测试策略,提出了一种更简单、环境驱动的1层方法,这是最近的一种范式转变,强调临床相关性和抗药物抗体的影响,而不仅仅是发病率。在第17届年度开放研讨会的一个研讨会上,会议强调了使用信噪比来评估低水平ADA反应,并解决了非特异性结合和检测可靠性等挑战。与会者就是否需要继续进行确认性测试进行了辩论,并认为应该根据具体情况进行测试。这一转变旨在改善临床测试策略,同时降低复杂性,促进数据驱动决策。案例研究,特别是来自高风险分子的案例研究,将指导实施。总的来说,1-Tier方法得到了强有力的支持,但它的成功取决于可靠的数据、行业协作和监管批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent discussions and proposals on challenging the 3-tier immunogenicity testing strategies from the European bioanalysis forum.

The European Bioanalysis Forum, in discussions with cross-industry experts from pharmaceutical, biotech, and contract research organizations, is continuing the challenge of the traditional 3-Tier immunogenicity testing strategy, proposing a simpler, context-driven 1-Tier approach, a recent paradigm shift that emphasizes clinical relevance and the impact of anti-drug antibodies over mere incidence. In a workshop at the 17th annual Open Symposium, the meeting highlighted using signal-to-noise ratios to assess low-level ADA responses and addressed challenges such as nonspecific binding and assay reliability. Participants debated the need for continued confirmatory testing, and that it should be performed on a case-by-case basis. The shift aims to improve clinical testing strategies while reducing complexity, promoting data-driven decisions. Case studies, particularly from high-risk molecules, will guide implementation. Overall, there's strong support for the 1-Tier approach, but its success depends on robust data, industry collaboration, and regulatory approval.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioanalysis
Bioanalysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing. The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality. Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing. The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques. Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信